A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition. Send story ideas to cf at centristcoalition . com

Explore the Centrist Blogosphere, an aggregator which lists the latest posts by Centrist bloggers

These bloggers are part of the Centrist Coalition:
Ambivablog
Another Opinion
Austin Centrist
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Maverick Views
The Moderate Voice
Moderate Voters
Stubborn Facts

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Independent Nation

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

February 02, 2009

Reality collides with Republican ideology. Ideology loses. Tax cuts are inefficient.

A year ago, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's published this little remarked upon bombshell regarding the effectiveness of certain strategies surrounding the2008 stimulus package. Obviously the not so liberal corporately biased media made little hay of this. Yet in terms of policy this should have a profound effect on how we handle the current stimulus package.

In Washington Throws the Economy a Rope(1/22/08)
he details how effective aid to state and local governments, increasing UI benefits or even increasing food stamp benefits are and how ineffective are the tax cuts for corporations(not many of them pay taxes anyway so a corporate tax cut is a rather obscene redundancy) and the reduction in capital gains tax. The upshot. We don't gain much at all from the latter two.
In his latest analysis of the current plan (in pdf) he notes that the temporary tax cuts:
do not provide a particularly large economic benefit. Accelerated depreciation by large businesses and expensing of investment by small businesses lowers the cost of capital only modestly and is not a critical factor in businesses' investment decisions, particularly when sales and pricing are so weak. The carry-back of business losses helps cash-strapped businesses, perhaps forestalling some cuts in investment and jobs, but it is unlikely to prompt much additional business expansion as it does not improve businesses' prospects. However, including business tax cuts in the stimulus plan is not very expensive, and they distribute the benefits of the stimulus more widely. This is useful if it expands political support for the stimulus plan and thus accelerates its adoption. Moreover, the depreciation benefits included in last year's fiscal stimulus have expired, and extending them through 2010 would forestall a badly timed additional factor (however small) depressing business investment.

Egads, for the last 30 years the GOP has been shooting blanks!!!

Well, sort of. It was more effective as political strategy, buying votes by being Mega Santa Claus, giving away tax cuts and giving away money with trillions in deficit spending. Creating boom and bust economies with deregulation and"free" money thrown into, oh, pushing oil prices up $120/bbl above what it was REALLY worth, as well as the illusion of wealth as speculators created a phantom economy that we borrowed on to make up for 30 years of labor compensation being decoupled from productivity.

For those GOP partisan skeptics, eat these words: Clinton's tax plan will fail and we will be in a fiscal hole and there won't be any surpluses. We ended up with a growing economy, 4-5 times more jobs than Bush created, and SURPLUSES!!! We hear that song again about Obama. But then he was left with the trillions of tons of crap in the stables of King Augeas to clean up, and it will take years, while lots more people will lose their jobs, their homes, their retirement and no doubt, as we've seen already in the news, their lives.

Thanks for nothing Republicans (and the spineless Democrats that enabled them).

Like Jon I am rather burnt out but moreso as one of the casulties of the war on the middle class as I am part of the 12-15 Trillion dollar drop in middle class wealth.
I'm several months away from losing my house unless I can get more work and even then its iffy. No one makes money on boom and bust more than the wealthy as the wealth stays privatized while the costs get socialized on everyone elses' back. I have too much on my plate to make more than one or two snarky remarks about how GOP supporters jumped their ideological ship by changing their investment strategies well before the November election and brag about how smart they were. Except for the years they wasted on voting for Republican that is....

Shall we say the Laffer and his moronic cronies are now fully discredited?..
and that Republicans whining about spending have no leg to stand on at all.

And can we put a stake in to the evil hearts of the Triple Santas of the GOP, Tax cuts, deregulation and MASSIVE deficit spending, the hallmarks of the Reagan(he doubled the national debt) and Bush and Bush2(who outdid Reagan) eras?

My hour is up, back to the long hard slog. Back to the High Castle......

Posted by Marcus at February 2, 2009 03:06 AM
Comments

...the hallmarks of the Reagan(he doubled the national debt) and Bush and Bush2(who outdid Reagan) eras?

...you're forgetting about Nixon. And, not only did he spend money as fast as possible, but he also killed the 70s economy by buying EVERYTHING in '72 to make sure everybody was happy and voted for him, and doing at least as much as OPEC by capping gas prices and setting a precedent for Ford. The last Republican President in office whose actions and deficit numbers in office showed interest in balancing the budget was Eisenhower, who left office almost half a century ago. So, remember, if you care about the economy, vote Dem.

We DO, I think *share* some blame in failure to reform Social Security and especially Medicare onto sane fiscal bearing in reasonable time to prevent them from running truly big red ink.

I've been wondering for decades at the motives of GOP voters. How many really believed GOP Presidents were balancing budgets, and how many liked the idea of passing things along to me and my kid? How many were simply content to let it roll while ignoring those annoying news stories about deficits?

Posted by: Jon Kay at February 2, 2009 11:30 PM

Very interesting post, Marcus. I wrote about it at PK and linked back to your post.

Posted by: Kevin at February 3, 2009 12:58 AM

The general problem with deficits is the spending, not the taxing. I do agree that deficit spending is bad bad bad, but in principle, how can letting people keep more of the money they earn be a bad thing? Cutting taxes should *always* be desired, even if it isn't always possible. Right?

Posted by: Justin at February 5, 2009 11:46 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Declare Your Independence - Unity08.com

Archives


Recent Entries

December 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661