|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
March 10, 2008the blunderbuss denialMickey Kaus has noticed the same embarrassing and weak debate technique that John McCain repeatedly uses when he's been pinned down on facts that are not to his liking: It doesn't look to me like John McCain was "unhinged" or "irate" or losing his "cool" in his recent videotaped airplane confrontation with the NYT's Elisabeth Bumiller. He was simply employing the debating tactic he often uses when confronted with a question he can't answer safely--which is to bully and intimidate and interrupt the questioner, using up all the available conversational space until the "questioning" moves on. (To get a word in edgwise, whoever is confronting him would have to be ready to engage in an undignified shouting match, which most are unwilling to do.) McCain used the same technique in the Republican debates when confronted with questions he didn't want to answer on immigration. The blunderbuss denial, ROTFL That's perfect. He did the blunderbuss when he got caught misleading folks about Romney's Iraq policy during one of the debates. He needs to come up with a better way to handle these moments. Because he's only weeks away from a "let's do the blunderbuss" clip on youtube, showing McCain's greatest hits where he bullies his way through legitimate questions he is unwilling to answer.
Comments
Yeah, except that wasn't what McCain was actually doing in this instance, as anyone with half a brain can see from watching the video. In fact, he was resisting being bullied by Bumiller, whereupon she fell back on the old 'why are you hitting yourself' technique. So your larger point may be valid--but you weaken the argument by piling onto Kaus' feeble hack-job here. Posted by: Hope Muntz at March 10, 2008 12:26 PMI've assumed this refers to the instance where McCain refused to answer questions about Kerry asking him to be his VP in 2004. If I'm wrong, my bad. But if that's the one, we'll have to agree to utterly disagree. I saw it. McCain was caught red-handed in a lie on that one. He denied the story in 2004, and now he says everyone knew it happened. Now, folks have argued that it doesn't matter because it's ancient history. And I agree on that point. I could care less about what went on between McCain and Kerry in 2004. But the way McCain handled reflects quite poorly on him. Especially because there seems to be a pattern. And I say this as a fan of the guy who wrote him in in 2004 rather than vote for either Bush or Kerry. (and I live in MA, so my vote didn't actually matter anyway, Kerry was a lock.) Posted by: kritter at March 10, 2008 12:35 PM |
Archives
March 2008
February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Maybe Privacy Rights Matter After All?
Current Market Trouble Bad, And About DEBT RISK, Not Subprimes More Evidence McCain Isn't Paying Attention In Iraq Arthur C. Clarke Is Dead NCAA Pools - Open Thread Tully's Circular Firing Squad Up And Going Pretending Rev. Wright's On The Ballot Knowing Yer Enemy: Iran And Communist States Are Politically Oligarchies Discounting Petulance Fratricide
|