|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 31, 2008Another Economic BoogeymanBad enough for us all that the economy isn't going so great, and that scary stories fan the flames of our worries, which make us spend less, which makes the economy go less great which leads to more scary stories which... That's bad enough. So imagine my further dismay to read an extensive article suggesting that there are portions of our inter-related global economy so complex and arcane that we're at their utter mercy. From The Black Box Economy, here's the main thesis as stated: The drumbeat of bad news over the past year, they say, is only a symptom of something new and unsettling - a deeper change in the financial system that may leave regulators, and even Congress, powerless when they try to wield their usual tools. Pretty scary, huh? Ready to crap your pants yet? I was buying in, even though I was wondering what the author, an assistant history professor, knew about economics. Then I got to this bit: ...when the mortgage crisis broke last summer, it opened a window on something else: The existence of a huge wilderness of investments in the financial sector that are nearly impossible to track or measure, and which operate out of the view of both investors and regulators. It emerged that investment banks, hedge funds, and other financial players had issued, bought, and sold hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of esoteric securities backed in part by other securities, which in turn were backed by payments on high-risk mortgages. Well, I'm no economist, but I know a bit, and this sounds like age-old garden-variety greed and speculation to me. Sure, lots of folks got killed on bad loans. But a big part of the story there, despite what some have heard, is that the folks who got killed borrowing were credit idiots who didn't deserve their loans in the first place, many of whom were foolishly using their home equity as an ATM. My sympathy for these folks is somewhat constrained. But I'll join those of us unhappy that the economy is now ailing due in large part to rampant real-estate speculation which led to the eager granting of tons of loans to people who couldn't afford them. Let's think about those eager granters, because now we're talking about the folks near or inside this alleged black box. Are we REALLY supposed to believe that high-powered worldwide investors were unaware of what was driving high investment returns? I don't buy it. You don 't have to be a financial savant to know that the high return on investment bone is ALWAYS connected to the high risk bone. IOW, I got your black box "right here," as they say. The vast majority of people managing or controlling large sums of money had to have made these investments with their eyes wide open. The returns have to come from somewhere, and anyone with minimal smarts knows enough to ask the basic questions. if it's high return, it's high risk, and there's usually a pretty simple explanation that goes like If A happens, we make a killing, and if B happens. we get slaughtered. And sure, I suppose it's possible that some investors really didn't ask or didn't understand the dynamics. Cry me a river for them. Bottom line, I'm just some guy, but I knew back a year or more ago when I heard about people taking loans where they were only paying back interest and not principal, and loans where the payments quickly escalated, that it was going to all end badly. Black Box? Doubt it. My guess is that it just seems like one when a bunch of folks get blinded by greed and all the tide riders go along for the trip without asking too many questions. Posted by Kranky Kritter at January 31, 2008 09:33 PMComments
You're right to wonder about his understanding of econ, I think. Not many economists, I think, are under the impression that they understand the economy. It's more like understanding the weather than, say, predicting gunshot tracks. The crisis is 90% worries about a real estate asset bubble burst. Alot of the money that left stocks in 2000-2001 went into real estate instead, causing many markets to overinflate, as economists have been warning for a long time. The subprime crisis in itself was small beer, contrary to the article. A small amount of money was involved, and it was widely distributed, making losses easy to absorb globally. It's true that there's been a real trust mistake. Capitalists believe in specialization, and so most outsourced decisions about issue trustworthiness to a handful of rating companies that got well and truly bamboozled. But only a small portion of the economy was in these issues. When the trust broke, capitalists suddenly didn't know how much to value entities to whom they were issuing loans to, from, and about, because ratings were wrong. So, for a little while there was it was too hard to get loans, even though only a fraction of book values were affected for most companies. It took extra perspective to operate in that environment. People have become (probably overly) scared to dip their toes into real estate. And that means real estate prices and valuations and construction all heading south at least somewhat. Every time the economic cycle turns, and a bubble bursts, we see essentially the same thing. A lot of people who got in on the bubble early, and were lucky/clever enough to get out just before the peak, get rich. A lot of people who got in late get burned. Remember the tech bubble? Same thing as the real estate bubble. Or, for the historically aware, the Dutch tulip bubble. At that point the economic pundits start talking about "value investing" -- i.e. buying something (like stocks) because they are actually worth something. If it wasn't for the fact that they act like it was a new idea, it would be much more impressive. Just one thing is sure, in another few years, the "next big thing" will come along. And we will go back to hearing about "momentum investing" -- whatever name gets applied to it next time. There really are a lot of people with short memories out there. Posted by: wj at February 1, 2008 11:06 AMPlease post a comment
|
Archives
February 2008
January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Three Quotes
The Choice, Based on Iraq Policy Even More Of A Surprise Castro Bows Out Kosovo Declares Independence Will Obama Take McCain's Funding Dare? Global Poverty Act Preservation Friday Band Taking on Obama Electoral Results Came Out As Expected?!?
|