|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 31, 2008McCain's GadflyWe all know that there's a core of GOP folks who think they ARE the base, and who think that John McCain is a sad excuse for a true republican. No surprise there. These critics seem to have been tuned out to some extent, as McCain is collecting endorsements and acting like the campaign has become a victory tour. But there's another critic out there. Matt Welch is something of a self-styled small-L libertarian and internationalist who seems committed to gadflying from a different angle, in How Johnny Got His Groove Back If John McCain bounces from his victory in Florida this week to a nomination-clinching Super-Duper Tuesday in California and the 23 Dwarves, there are three main categories of humans he'll have to thank for the biggest worst-to-first primary performance since George McGovern's in 1972. They are: his pratfalling competitors, his gullible independent supporters and his always-willing enablers in the media. Welch is so convinced and irritated that McCain is not what he sells himself as that he has gone to the trouble to write a book on it: McCain: The Myth of a Maverick, And as editor of Reason, he wrote An Open Letter to Editorial Page Editors suggesting they all need to review his record more closely for the gap between fact and well-honed myth: I bring you all here on this Michigan primary day to make one last plea on behalf of the dwindling number of us who read or care about newspaper editorials. Before passing on your McEnthusiasms to the Copy Desk, please remember your canonical journalistic responsibility not to make shit up or pass along easily debunkable falsehoods. Particularly when the subject of your affection has provided copious evidence to the contrary of your claims. And so on. Anyway, we've heard the conservative McCain critics ad nauseum. Welch's criticism is different, that maybe McCain is not so much the maverick and straight-shooter he sells himself as. Check it out. Posted by Kranky Kritter at January 31, 2008 09:04 PMComments
I'm probably one of those independents that like John McCain more than they should. (But my mind is always open - stay in there, brain.) Anyway, I was thinking some time ago that McCain would make a big comeback after the shiny new guys lost their showroom luster. McCain is like comfort food - tried and true, familiar and somehow just a bit nostalgic - good, old John. He's meatloaf and mashed pototoes for independents and self-described centrists and moderates. I guess the sushi sat out too long. This is all, of course, non-substantive talk, which accords well with the post, I think. Posted by: WHQ at February 1, 2008 10:25 AMI wonder how many of McCain's supporters ran thru this chain of reasoning: I can see where someone who disagreed with McCain about lots and lots of other issues (from pre-emptive war to abortion) could decide that the torture issue was important enough to overcome everything else. Not to mention someone who actually agreed with McCain on some other issues. Anybody seen any poll results which might confirm or refute that idea? Posted by: wj at February 1, 2008 10:56 AMWhat's of most curious interest to me regarding McCain at this point in time is Welch's emphasis on McCain as an uber-hawk. Not because I was unaware, but because its liable to come under much more heightened scrutiny if indeed McCain gets the GOP nod. Let's face it, a substantial part of McCain's appeal to independents and some on the left comes from our glee whenever his iconclasm makes the GOP faithful red-faced mad. So far, many of his independent fans have had the luxury of a limited and haphazard understanding of the man. Undoubtedly, many folks who are either anti-war or anti-Bush or just anti-torture vastly appreciate his let's call it enlightened perspective on torture, as a former POW. Does that appreciation extend to understanding that even so, he's demonstrably more hawkish than Romney or Bush or almost anyone else? Or that he takes a very black and white historical view of foreign policy? I don't think it's common knowledge. I think some folks have been pointing it out, but that many of his independent fans are prone to dismiss it because they are so swayed by his image as a forthright, honorable, truth-telling guy. When a public figure has such an image, we tend to fill in the blanks with our own needs and desires instead of digging for clues that could tarnish the hero. Ultimately, each one of us has to decide for his or her self what the answer is to "who is John McCain, really? And my purpose here isn't to tell anyone per se. Right now, I am curious to see whether McCain's support from the middle and left will get dented when a brighter spotlight is shone on his very aggressive foreign policy views. My guess is that it siphons off most of whatever left support he has, but that many independents may hang in there, because a lot of independents are hawks. Posted by: kritter at February 1, 2008 12:34 PMPlease post a comment
|
Archives
February 2008
January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Three Quotes
The Choice, Based on Iraq Policy Even More Of A Surprise Castro Bows Out Kosovo Declares Independence Will Obama Take McCain's Funding Dare? Global Poverty Act Preservation Friday Band Taking on Obama Electoral Results Came Out As Expected?!?
|