|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
September 10, 2007After 10,000 Years, Farming No Longer DominatesPeter Magnusson has pointed out that farming has stopped being the biggest category of job people on the planet do ( slashdot thread). It's because people have been slowly getting more and more efficient at growing things. Fewer and fewer people or acres are needed to make more and more food. Yes, acres are being retired every year from farming, considerably raising the amount of unused land in the US. I haven't checked global stats to see if farming retirement exceeds greater usage from population growth worldwide. This certainly doesn't mean there's danger of not having enough farmers to grow things. No, efficiency will continue to rise. If a crisis of some sort arises, we'll see prices rise enough to tempt people and ex-farmland back to work. As recently as 200 years ago, a smart man, one Jefferson, couldn't imagine the United States ever going mostly industrial, much less beyond that. Progress has been decidedly uneven - the US employs 1/20th (OK, that's probably wrong because of illegal immigration, but even with that it's a small %age) of its workforce to make a huge and pretty varied food surplus, while the world as a whole needs 36% of its labor force to make decidedly less good meals for most of itself. One reason for this is that there are more and more jobs, especially in the advanced democracies, that make farming look bad-paying and with terribly hard labor conditions - long hours and terrible uncertainty. They pay better because they make higher-value things like computers, software, and movies. There's more overall money/person in services (software and movies are counted as servies) than in industry, and more per person in industry than in farming. Of course, it's not quite that simple - there are plenty of people making more money in farming than in cold-calling services, for example. And, alas, World Hunger is still very much with us. There is no sign of distribution becoming COMPLETELY global, nor of grinding poverty vanishing (though both problems are diminishing). Posted by Jon Kay at September 10, 2007 12:19 AMComments
While mechanization and various types of genetic manipulation had increased farm productivity a large part is due to cheap petrol. It will be interesting to see what happens to this trend in a couple of decades as cheap petroleum is replaced by high priced petroleum products such as fertilizers and pesticides. Posted by: Marcus at September 10, 2007 01:32 AMCheap petroleum factors into farm productivity two ways: But the former may not be quite so large a problem as you suspect. Compare the prices for organic vs. regular produce at your local grocery. That's the effective difference in non-fuel costs -- including both inputs and labor. Granted there are different techniques to learn and put into practice. But farmers have been doing that already, so there is even a cadre of knowledgable farms to spread the knowledge when the demand picks up. Posted by: wj at September 10, 2007 11:29 AM |
Archives
February 2008
January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Three Quotes
The Choice, Based on Iraq Policy Even More Of A Surprise Castro Bows Out Kosovo Declares Independence Will Obama Take McCain's Funding Dare? Global Poverty Act Preservation Friday Band Taking on Obama Electoral Results Came Out As Expected?!?
|