A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition. Send story ideas to cf at centristcoalition . com

Explore the Centrist Blogosphere, an aggregator which lists the latest posts by Centrist bloggers

These bloggers are part of the Centrist Coalition:
Ambivablog
Another Opinion
Austin Centrist
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Maverick Views
The Moderate Voice
Moderate Voters
Stubborn Facts

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Independent Nation

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

February 08, 2007

Edward's Universal Health Plan

John Edward's has a plan to cover all of us. According to his website:

Under the Edwards Plan:

-Families without insurance will get coverage at an affordable price.
-Families with insurance will pay less and get more security and choices.
-Businesses and other employers will find it cheaper and easier to insure their workers.

The Edwards Plan achieves universal coverage by:

-Requiring businesses and other employers to either cover their employees or help finance their health insurance.
-Making insurance affordable by creating new tax credits, expanding Medicaid and SCHIP, reforming insurance laws, and taking innovative steps to contain health care costs.
-Creating regional "Health Markets" to let every American share the bargaining power to purchase an affordable, high-quality health plan, increase choices among insurance plans, and cut costs for businesses offering insurance.
-Once these steps have been taken, requiring all American residents to get insurance.

Some thoughts:

If I were Hillary Clinton I would be gagging, and then I would say: "Hey John, that sounds like a good idea. I am glad I had it over ten years ago." This looks, smells, and feels a lot like Hillary-care. An idea that was brushed aside way too quickly IMHO.

I give Edwards credit for brining up the issue. I simply cannot accept the fact that the greatest country in the world has 50 million people not covered by health insurance. It doesn't say a lot about our moral fiber. To not have universal healthcare, in my view, is completely assinine. Furthermore, I think if we are going to achieve it we will do so with something similiar to what Hillary and now Edwards has proposed, rather than a single payer system.

I especially like the idea of "Health Markets." They work for big business and big labor, why shouldn't the rest of us benefit from them?

Posted by Starbucks Republican at February 8, 2007 03:14 PM
Comments

The first comment at Marginal Revolution is worth quoting in full:

    Private insurance would be available through a mechanism Edwards calls "Health Markets."
    Did anyone else crack up at reading this? Let me guess:
    "Patients and insurers will reward health care providers with what Edwards calls 'Money.' Americans will monitor their health through what Edwards calls 'Doctor Visits.' They will secure access to this money through a mechanism Edwards calls 'Having a Job.' Decision to provide or purchase various medical service will be determined by what Edwards calls 'Supply and Demand.' People will arrive at health care providers in what Edwards calls 'Vehicles.'"
I'm certainly no expert on the looming health insurance crisis (or lack thereof) but it seems to me any policy that both raises taxes and forces people to spend more of their money on insurance through lawful compulsion may not be the best plan. That's just my off-the-cuff thought though.

Posted by: Scotch Drinker at February 8, 2007 03:36 PM

Finding ways to give all individuals a share in some form of collective bargaining power makes sense to me. It has always seemed fundamentally unfair, even perverse that some people must pay a higher price for insurance simpl becuase they haven't managned to happen upon membership in one club or another.

The rest of it leaves me with more questions than answers. And I don't like the answers that I can imagine for the questions. Where's the money for the extra care going to come from? From businesses? From those who already have insurance? From the empty pockets of those without? From mandated lower costs?

IOW, sounds like BS to me.

Posted by: bk at February 8, 2007 03:49 PM

Just remember, don't call those mandatory premiums a "tax."

Posted by: Tully at February 8, 2007 04:10 PM

Universal health care sounds great. It is an idea that is easy to support. The devil is in the details though. What would this cover? Is universal coverage for "erectile disfunction", required? What about organ transplants for the elderly? Motorized artifical limbs? The cost difference between minimal coverage and coverage for anything and everything would be significant.

Posted by: Bernie at February 8, 2007 06:21 PM

didn't Ted Kennedy mount a filibuster a few months ago over wether trade organizations could form partnerships across state lines so businesses coulf form together to get better rates fir their employees..personally I like Edwards idea, but Hillary did think of it a few years ago!

Posted by: mac at February 10, 2007 11:30 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Declare Your Independence - Unity08.com

Archives


Recent Entries

February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661