|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 13, 2007Giuliani and Gingrich on Iraq InfrastructureThe former Mayor and Speaker of the House team up in the Wall Street Journal to co-author an op-ed on Iraq: The American mission in Iraq must succeed. Our goal--promoting a stable, accountable democracy in the heart of the Middle East--cannot be achieved by purely military means. Interesting points, but what they don't discuss is what we are going to take troops away from in order for them to take part in buidling infrastructure such as a jobs program. Also interesting that two potential 2008 opponents are writing an op-ed together. Hmmm... What if a Giuliani-Gingrich ticket were to be formed before the Republican primary process took place? What if Giuliani sees Gingrich as a way to garner Conservative grass roots support and avoid questions about his stance on social issues? I'm just saying, nobody is as popular with the true red Republican primary voters as the former Speaker of the House, although a vote for him to be the Republican nominee would be a waste. Deep down Newt is smart enough to know that he doesn't have a chance on his own. What if they had the opportunity to vote for him and not waste their vote? Posted by Starbucks Republican at January 13, 2007 08:34 PMComments
I feel Newt is untrustworthy enough that I'd never consider voting for Newt to be that close to being President. You know, there's a reason why the Iraqi economy isn't taking off - security. They'd have to use still more troops to guard it, or it'd be hopeless. Posted by: Jon Kay at January 13, 2007 11:44 PMUntrustworthy? Hmmm... I have heard him called a lot of things, but not that. Posted by: Mathew at January 14, 2007 12:18 AMUntrustworthy? Hmmm... I have heard him called a lot of things, but not that. Posted by: Mathew at January 14, 2007 12:19 AMI have relatives in his district. They (including one excellent judge of character) feel he's utterly untrustworthy. Watching him, I'm reminded of Nixon. He has his great moments, to be sure, but also his bad and paranoid moments. Like Nixon, alot of his rise to power involved investigating Democrats rather than constructive work. I see no reason to trust him more than Nixon, and Nixon ruined '70s politics, screwed up the Vietnam War by lying to the public, appointed a bunch of evil people to high office. committed plenty of evil, and ruined the economy until the early 80s, when it finally recovered from the gas price caps. P.S.: if he's campaigning, you'll have plenty of opportunity to watch for his bad side yourself. You know, there's a reason why the Iraqi economy isn't taking off Actually, it IS taking off. Despite a hostile climate for business in Baghdad, business is booming overall across the nation. Don't confuse structural and infrastructural deficits with overall economic activity. Gingrich and Guiliani's bigger point is that the current high unemployment has ramifications that can be somewhat addressed through boosting employment, especially if done in such a way that addresses the other structural/infrastructural deficits. Posted by: Tully at January 14, 2007 06:02 PMUnemployment can be addressed by boosting employment? These guys are real wizards, I'd never have thought of that! Posted by: bk at January 16, 2007 01:52 PM |
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
July 4: Gasbag Edition
Independent Open Thread: Whatcha Doing This Weekend? Long Tail Controversy and Explanations Canadian Human Rights Commission No, Slavery Wasn't Competive With Free Labor Back online Irish Blogger Charged For Blogging Friday open thread Headline: Obama and Clinton Together in Unity There Is No EPA Document, There Is No EPA Document
|