A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition. Send story ideas to cf at centristcoalition . com

Explore the Centrist Blogosphere, an aggregator which lists the latest posts by Centrist bloggers

These bloggers are part of the Centrist Coalition:
Ambivablog
Another Opinion
Austin Centrist
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Maverick Views
The Moderate Voice
Moderate Voters
Stubborn Facts

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Independent Nation

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

December 08, 2006

McCain slams Baker-Hamilton

John McCain is the latest to join in the criticism that Baker-Hamilton is little more than vacuous tautology. McCain adds "dangerous" to that list:

"There's only one thing worse than an overstressed Army and Marine Corps, and that's a defeated Army and Marine Corps," said Mr. McCain, the Arizona Republican who sits on the Armed Services Committee. "We saw that in 1973. And I believe that this [Baker-Hamilton] is a recipe that will lead to, sooner or later, our defeat in Iraq" ... Observed Mr. McCain [about Iran]: "I don't believe that a peace conference with people who are dedicated to your extinction has much short-term gain."
Lieberman agrees:
Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Democrat and a staunch supporter of the war, commended the group for some of the choices it made, but said most of its recommendations are no different from "the policies that we have been following." And some recommendations, he said, seemed unrealistic. "I'm skeptical that it's realistic to think that Iran wants to help the United States succeed in Iraq," Mr. Lieberman told the group's co-chairmen, former Secretary of State James A. Baker III and former Rep. Lee H. Hamilton, yesterday. "They are, after all, supporting Hezbollah, which gathers people in the square in Beirut to shout, 'Death to America.' "

Posted by Simon at December 8, 2006 01:21 PM
Comments

These two are destroying their credibility. The Study Group's recommendations are common sense approaches to prevent a regional crisis. The time has long passed to add more troops. The time has long passed to reverse the course and succeed. What is success at this point? There are refugees pouring out of Iraq, but Iran and Syria don't have interests that we can shake out. No one is saying we need to appease or kiss Iran's ass. The Study Group isn't suggesting we give up anything to these two rogue countries.

In my judgement McCain is throwing his chances for the Presidency out the window.

Posted by: brianr at December 8, 2006 01:58 PM

Brian, have you got any reliable sources to back up your contention that refugees are pouring out of Iraq? I have not heard anything about this.

Posted by: bk at December 8, 2006 02:32 PM

Actually I read something similar that Turkey, in particular has seen hundreds of thousands of refugees, primarily Kurds. Unfortunately I cannot recall the source...

Posted by: TN at December 8, 2006 03:42 PM

I haven't heard a single thing about unrest in the Kurdish regions of Iraq, never mind masses of refugees. I would love to see some reliable sources to confirm them.I sure hope no one is spreading bad rumors.

Posted by: bk at December 8, 2006 03:52 PM

OK, here's what I was able to find from the 10/22/06 Washington Post:

The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees reported this month that at least 914,000 Iraqis have left their homes since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, with more than third fleeing since an increase in sectarian bloodshed at the start of this year.

Syria and Jordan have received a majority of the displaced who left Iraq, with at least 40,000 Iraqis arriving in Syria every month for the last four months, the agency said. More than 500,000 Iraqis live in Syria, many of them refugees like al-Mawla who fled after 2003.

According to a report released this month by the UNHCR, the U.N. Children's Fund and the World Food Program, 48 percent of the Iraqi refugees in Syria are children, 90 percent fled because of security fears, 58 percent are Shiite and a majority are from Baghdad.

It doesn't say how big a majority. FWIW, Iraq is a nation of about 26 million people.

CBS says 100k per month, according to AP

Now I wish they WERE bad rumors. Yikes!

Posted by: bk at December 8, 2006 04:10 PM

McCain/Lieberman 2008...

I'm just saying.

Posted by: Mathew at December 8, 2006 05:18 PM

Politics notwithstanding, I think McCain and Lieberman are simply trying to point out that a lot of what's coming out of the ISG is empty, smooth-sounding rhetoric.

Posted by: Rafique Tucker at December 8, 2006 10:29 PM

The 100K/month numbers are seriously exaggerated ("AP" is a clue there) but the outflow is real. They include the tens of thousands of regime Baathists who fled to Syria with the fall of Saddam.

Posted by: Tully at December 8, 2006 11:06 PM

Brian, as my post suggests, I don't see how any ISG recommendation will contain the militias.

Posted by: Jon Kay at December 9, 2006 03:07 PM

There's also an estimated 300k to 500k "internally displaced persons" (refugees who stay in the country) in our province, Karbala, alone. We don't know exactly how many, of course, but the population swung from about 780k to 1.4M, and we suspect that the vast majority came from IDPs. Luckily, the Iraqi Director-General for IDPs in Karbala is a first-rate fellow, and we have a plan to mitigate the effect this is having on the security situation.

Posted by: Bobby at December 10, 2006 07:47 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Declare Your Independence - Unity08.com

Archives


Recent Entries

February 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661