|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
December 08, 2006McCain slams Baker-HamiltonJohn McCain is the latest to join in the criticism that Baker-Hamilton is little more than vacuous tautology. McCain adds "dangerous" to that list: "There's only one thing worse than an overstressed Army and Marine Corps, and that's a defeated Army and Marine Corps," said Mr. McCain, the Arizona Republican who sits on the Armed Services Committee. "We saw that in 1973. And I believe that this [Baker-Hamilton] is a recipe that will lead to, sooner or later, our defeat in Iraq" ... Observed Mr. McCain [about Iran]: "I don't believe that a peace conference with people who are dedicated to your extinction has much short-term gain."Lieberman agrees: Sen. Joe Lieberman, Connecticut Democrat and a staunch supporter of the war, commended the group for some of the choices it made, but said most of its recommendations are no different from "the policies that we have been following." And some recommendations, he said, seemed unrealistic. "I'm skeptical that it's realistic to think that Iran wants to help the United States succeed in Iraq," Mr. Lieberman told the group's co-chairmen, former Secretary of State James A. Baker III and former Rep. Lee H. Hamilton, yesterday. "They are, after all, supporting Hezbollah, which gathers people in the square in Beirut to shout, 'Death to America.' "Posted by Simon at December 8, 2006 01:21 PM Comments
These two are destroying their credibility. The Study Group's recommendations are common sense approaches to prevent a regional crisis. The time has long passed to add more troops. The time has long passed to reverse the course and succeed. What is success at this point? There are refugees pouring out of Iraq, but Iran and Syria don't have interests that we can shake out. No one is saying we need to appease or kiss Iran's ass. The Study Group isn't suggesting we give up anything to these two rogue countries. In my judgement McCain is throwing his chances for the Presidency out the window. Posted by: brianr at December 8, 2006 01:58 PMBrian, have you got any reliable sources to back up your contention that refugees are pouring out of Iraq? I have not heard anything about this. Posted by: bk at December 8, 2006 02:32 PMActually I read something similar that Turkey, in particular has seen hundreds of thousands of refugees, primarily Kurds. Unfortunately I cannot recall the source... Posted by: TN at December 8, 2006 03:42 PMI haven't heard a single thing about unrest in the Kurdish regions of Iraq, never mind masses of refugees. I would love to see some reliable sources to confirm them.I sure hope no one is spreading bad rumors. Posted by: bk at December 8, 2006 03:52 PMOK, here's what I was able to find from the 10/22/06 Washington Post: The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees reported this month that at least 914,000 Iraqis have left their homes since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, with more than third fleeing since an increase in sectarian bloodshed at the start of this year. It doesn't say how big a majority. FWIW, Iraq is a nation of about 26 million people. CBS says 100k per month, according to AP Now I wish they WERE bad rumors. Yikes! Posted by: bk at December 8, 2006 04:10 PMPolitics notwithstanding, I think McCain and Lieberman are simply trying to point out that a lot of what's coming out of the ISG is empty, smooth-sounding rhetoric. Posted by: Rafique Tucker at December 8, 2006 10:29 PMThe 100K/month numbers are seriously exaggerated ("AP" is a clue there) but the outflow is real. They include the tens of thousands of regime Baathists who fled to Syria with the fall of Saddam. Posted by: Tully at December 8, 2006 11:06 PMBrian, as my post suggests, I don't see how any ISG recommendation will contain the militias. There's also an estimated 300k to 500k "internally displaced persons" (refugees who stay in the country) in our province, Karbala, alone. We don't know exactly how many, of course, but the population swung from about 780k to 1.4M, and we suspect that the vast majority came from IDPs. Luckily, the Iraqi Director-General for IDPs in Karbala is a first-rate fellow, and we have a plan to mitigate the effect this is having on the security situation. Posted by: Bobby at December 10, 2006 07:47 AM |
Archives
February 2008
January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Three Quotes
The Choice, Based on Iraq Policy Even More Of A Surprise Castro Bows Out Kosovo Declares Independence Will Obama Take McCain's Funding Dare? Global Poverty Act Preservation Friday Band Taking on Obama Electoral Results Came Out As Expected?!?
|