|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 30, 200610 Days of Substance"Ten days of substance. That's all we ask." So writes Jamison Foser in his Open Letter to the "Gang of 500". Ignore for a moment the left-wing nature of the source, because it's a damn good read for anyone who cares. No, the American people know what is important. Iraq is important. Capturing or killing Osama bin Laden is important. Keeping America safe, securing our ports, and preventing future attacks are important. The growing gap between rich and poor is important; the fact that millions of Americans lack health care is important.Posted by Oberon at October 30, 2006 09:45 AM Comments
I'd love to see an empirical study of campaign content that weighs policy vs non-policy issues in a campaign and see how the trend line changes as the election approaches. To me, ten days to go means it is time to get the waders on because it is going to get shoveled higher and faster. Ten days of sound bite city and image spin. Even debates are pretty useless this close. Everyone has been coached to say as little as possible in as many words as possible. At local level, you will get some decent policy discussions, but the higher up the political food chain you go, the silliness increases. Its not a left or right wing issue either. Youtube may explode this week. I am sure there will be a ton of 'anonymous' items popping up over the next week. If you want to blow a hole in the campaign finance laws, youtube will be the place to do it. Posted by: Jim M at October 30, 2006 01:59 PMI can't say that I disagree with the observation. Kinda of like what I've been posting for years. There has been a irresponsible neglect by media to even focus public attention on defining the terms used in the terrorism debate, such as "terrorist", "pre-emptive", self-defense", "human rights" or even "freedom of speech", or the "right to privacy". I would love Fox to devote some time defining Fundamentalism, or the BBC in defining “terrorism” The bottom line is that only economic crisis and/or serious national threats really drive elections. The media has focused on neither in its reporting of the world or our economy. Still, in the calm before the storm, policy makers ought to consider the political consequences of near term intelligence failures and any successful attacks against us or our allies. Despite this, Democrats often base their estimations on strange assumptions about the world. I mentioned Ted Koppel's "Don Corleone" approach to Iran, which I think far more inhuman than our present bungling. It would be a horrible failure. No matter what the world thinks, tens of thousands of capable Muslim extremists along with a vast network of other antagonists and criminals are expanding their operational capabilities. Convincing a larger number of people worldwide will not change that. Several regimes are engaged in the production and development of wmd whose leaders are linked directly to the terrorist/intelligence network. Democrats this election cycle are amazed Foley and North Korea moved Iran and Lebanon off center. Instead, of focusing on the terrorist issue, their campaign talks of change. Hmmmm..... I wonder why the media during these last months simply ignored the refutation of the Lebanon cease fire by the UN, the lack of global intervention on African genocide perpetrated by Muslim extremists, the inability to quarantine NK, or even sanction Iran. There is no frank media discussion about what a strong American policy should be like while myths are hoisted in place of facts.
How can media debate "the war on terror" without defining the terms, antagonists and reasonable options? As long as media ignores who is responsible for the Congo and Sudan, how can they speak about the carnage in Iraq? As long as they do not fear Mullahs with nukes, why do they tremble before Big Brother? Until media frets less about religious cartoons and more about broadcasting terrorist propaganda, media will remain an amplifier for boardrooms and special interests groups who seek to stir opinion rather than educate it. 10 Days would be impossible, unless you make reality a Reality Show. 10 reporters seeking to survive assignments in the worst places. Seems an awful lofty goal to ty to break the record by 10. Posted by: bk at October 31, 2006 09:11 AM |
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|