|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 15, 2006Hypocrites and hypocrites who write about themFrank Rich in the New York Times today (warning: subscribers only) decries the Republican "pathology" of demonizing gays despite a number of openly and not-so-openly gay members of the Republican elite. I note this paragraph: The moment Mr. Foley’s e-mails became known, we saw that brand of fearmongering and bigotry at full tilt: Bush administration allies exploited the former Congressman’s predatory history to spread the grotesque canard that homosexuality is a direct path to pedophilia. It’s the kind of blood libel that in another era was spread about Jews. Okay, now this later passage: The only way that comic setup could be topped was by the news that Mr. Foley was chairman of the Missing and Exploited Children’s Caucus. It beggars the imagination that he wasn’t also entrusted with No Child Left Behind. So Mr. Comments
I'd like to see a single quote from a Bush administration official in which any member of it "spread the grotesque canard that homos*xuality is a direct path to pedophilia". In fact, I've seen at least one Democratic candidate criticizing the Repulican House leadership for not being more responsive to the initial complaints about Foley being overly-friendly, simply because Foley was gay. In fact, President Bush, while opposing "gay marriage" has supported civil unions and generally done a great deal to at least preserve, and sometimes expand, Clinton-era protections against discrimination based on s*xual orientation. Remember those tapes of Bush's chats with a friend of his which came out last year? Signs of Concern Typical media slander-in-passing-without-citation story. But you're quite right about Rep. Frank's hypocrisy. Posted by: PatHMV at October 16, 2006 12:59 AMUm, that wasn't Barney Frank, but Frank Rich. Though some of the testimonials to Gerry Studds can be taken hilariously out of context, even Barney Frank's. Gerry was a forceful advocate for causes that were not always popular and that were consequently shunned by many politicians. --Barney Frank on Gerry Studds Just not by Mark Foley! Studd's widower's remarks are even better. Gerry often said that it was the fight for gay and lesbi@n equality that was the last great civil rights chapter in modern American history. He did not live to see its final sentences written... --Dean Hara, Studd's spouse But we hear he did do a few pages! Sorry, just one of those days when I can't resist a straight line. (Oh no, I did it again.) Posted by: Tully at October 16, 2006 12:27 PMthat was....bland Posted by: Marcus at October 16, 2006 11:23 PMYeah, it's not nearly as entertaining as Santorum comparing the gay lifestyle to "man on dog" stuff or--my personal favorite--Sen. Lott saying gays are akin to kleptomanics. But let's bear with Tully. I have those moods where everything is a straight line with me, too. Cheer up, they eventually fade; ususally when somebody hits you for being irritating beyond bearing. ;-) Posted by: Blue Jean at October 16, 2006 11:32 PMPS: you can usually find NYT columnists (on the left side of the aisle anyway) without paying subscription fees here. You can find more fun quotes from Tony Perkins (not the Pschyo one), Pat Buchanan, etc. here. (Though not the best one, where Falwell blames 9/11 on the gays.)
Jean, it's nice that you don't consider the ex-Louisianian Tony Perkins as Psycho... Having known the man down here, I'm not sure I can agree with you, though. ;-) Posted by: PatHMV at October 17, 2006 09:53 AMBut I wanted the psycho Tony Perkins action figure! Sniff. It was gonna go next to my Howard Dean action figure! (Put it in front of a microphone and it sticks its foot in its mouth...) Jean, why do I suspect that Truthout and HRC will be quoting people out of context a lot, and trying to blame centrists and mainstreamers for the mutterings of nutjobs? Following their tactics, can I blame Lynn Stewart on Ben Nelson, and you-know-who on Harry Ried? (Don't forget, you-know-who is a dedicated Democrat!) Yep, that's all CPD sarcasm. Except the bit about the action figures. Posted by: Tully at October 17, 2006 11:31 AMI will note the point of Frank Rich's article, despite that horrendous Foley comment, which is that whenever the GOP is in trouble they go to god, guns and gays. Inre to gays it gets pretty nasty, especially from the proxies oon the religious right, including the implication that all gays are pedophiles etc. A simple search of google or yahoo brings up a number of interesting aspersions from that part of the GOP base. Nevermind that more than 90% of the pedophiles are hetros\..xual. Speaking of action dolls, I recall a few people put out an Anita Bryant doll way back when- in various stages of pervy dress and undress. She had a problem with the "threat" of militant homo(Blankblank)xuality. That filter - I can't use the full spelling of hetero**** cause it don't like s at the end of "ero".
|
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|