A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition. Send story ideas to cf at centristcoalition . com

Explore the Centrist Blogosphere, an aggregator which lists the latest posts by Centrist bloggers

These bloggers are part of the Centrist Coalition:
Ambivablog
Another Opinion
Austin Centrist
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Maverick Views
The Moderate Voice
Moderate Voters
Stubborn Facts

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Independent Nation

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

October 13, 2006

A Controversial Proposal

Putting a tax on oil imports seems like a good idea.

In order to generate a better comment-thread, perhaps I should propose that we tax oil imports and use the revenue to fund coercive military interrogations at Guantanamo. And abortions for teen-agers.

Posted by Oberon at October 13, 2006 07:08 AM
Comments

Getting a little dull in the old blogosphere, huh?

Posted by: Chesty at October 13, 2006 09:39 AM

I LIKE dead puppies! Frankly, I'm totally in favor of using federally supported municipal bonds to pay for forced busing of Soviet Communists to come into your homes to kill your puppies!

Posted by: Frank Noland at October 13, 2006 11:08 AM

Perhaps you could give us a clue as to what your goal is.

Pot-stirring. He said so.

Posted by: Tully at October 13, 2006 02:16 PM

I say we use the money to fund a GWAR concert on the campus of Liberty University. On second thought, that's not controversial enough. Too many people would like it.

Posted by: WHQ at October 13, 2006 02:35 PM

Perhaps you could give us a clue as to what your goal is.

My goal: world peace; not go bald; proscastinate at the office.

Oh, you mean with the foreign oil tax thing. Thoughts:

1. Encourage energy efficiency, but not put the tax directly on the public cuz a gas tax on the pump is pretty much political suicide.

2. Lessen dependence on foreign oil, send less American dollars to middle east, Venezuela, etc.

3. Raise revenue.

4. Proscratinate at work.

Posted by: Oberon at October 13, 2006 03:03 PM

ALL gas taxes are paid at the pump.

Now, procrastination on the clock--THERE'S a worthy goal!

Posted by: Tully at October 13, 2006 03:25 PM

Well, it would have to be a hefty enough tax to make other sources (e.g coal or solar) economic by comparison. And, as Tully says, it all ends up being paid at the pump. Although . . . this might be a way to get it in without political suicide -- count on voters' lack of economic understanding to fool them on why gas prices are up. ;-)

Procrastination -- definitely a worthy goal, given it's close relationship to sloth. There's much to be said for the idea that sloth is the most under-appreciated human virtue. It is, after all, responsible for all human progress. Why was the wheel invented? Somebody was tired of dragging stuff around. Why was the automobile invented? Someone didn't want to have to muck out the stable any more. You get the idea. So you can not only procrastinate, you can feel virtuous at the same time!

Posted by: wj at October 13, 2006 07:07 PM

Don't mistake lazy with efficienct.

I'm all for a very high gas tax. Whatever the national economy will bear. One dollar per gallon added tax would bring an extra $150B (not weighted for adverse economic factors) into the government coffers. Do I hear two? We have to cover those SS bills coming due. I have some control over my gasoline consumption at any rate.

Posted by: Dennis at October 14, 2006 02:09 AM

Thank you, Dennis, for an honest reason to raise the gas tax. FOR THE MONEY!

I've been a wee bit annoyed of late with gas-taxers who claimed their motive for $1/gallon tax on gasoline was to slow consumption and spur research into alt energy, and then proceed to scream and yell when gas goes up on its own.

Posted by: Tully at October 14, 2006 10:56 AM

Oh, yeah, I almost forgot. Oberon, this post of yours that you placed up while comments were dead?

Calculated Risk notes that the public debt rose a just a tad last year: about $574.3 billion (after subtracting surpluses in social security and other trust funds).

You're lying. Calculated Risk did not make any such misstatement of fact, you did that on your own. The figure you cite includes ALL government "trust fund" surpluses including SS surpluses, as anyone who can read the linked Treasury figures could figure out in about 3 seconds.

I don't accuse you of the following, but it always amuses me when the debt doomsayers scream and yell about the national debt, yet at the same time insist that nothing at all is wrong with Social Security.

Future post upcoming on the public debt and how it gets misrepresented over at Stubborn Facts.

Posted by: Tully at October 14, 2006 01:30 PM

Tully,
Did you mention pot? Here's a new twist to an old plant

If anyone is bored, there is always this to get a great laugh over what our adversaries are spewing.

I suggest not combining the first subject with the last.

As for the record: how about using the oil tax to create a hybrid between birds and humans. Then our off-spring can fly instead of drive.

P.S. Tully, my imagined Clinton response to Chris Wallace's "North Korea accusation" was meant to be a bit humorous...

Posted by: Maxtrue at October 14, 2006 04:34 PM

Anymore I consider Clinton's real words to be a bit humorous!

Posted by: Tully at October 14, 2006 07:05 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Declare Your Independence - Unity08.com

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661