|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 13, 2006A Controversial ProposalPutting a tax on oil imports seems like a good idea. In order to generate a better comment-thread, perhaps I should propose that we tax oil imports and use the revenue to fund coercive military interrogations at Guantanamo. And abortions for teen-agers. Posted by Oberon at October 13, 2006 07:08 AMComments
Getting a little dull in the old blogosphere, huh? Posted by: Chesty at October 13, 2006 09:39 AMI LIKE dead puppies! Frankly, I'm totally in favor of using federally supported municipal bonds to pay for forced busing of Soviet Communists to come into your homes to kill your puppies! Posted by: Frank Noland at October 13, 2006 11:08 AMPerhaps you could give us a clue as to what your goal is. Pot-stirring. He said so. Posted by: Tully at October 13, 2006 02:16 PMI say we use the money to fund a GWAR concert on the campus of Liberty University. On second thought, that's not controversial enough. Too many people would like it. Posted by: WHQ at October 13, 2006 02:35 PMPerhaps you could give us a clue as to what your goal is. My goal: world peace; not go bald; proscastinate at the office. Oh, you mean with the foreign oil tax thing. Thoughts: 1. Encourage energy efficiency, but not put the tax directly on the public cuz a gas tax on the pump is pretty much political suicide. 2. Lessen dependence on foreign oil, send less American dollars to middle east, Venezuela, etc. 3. Raise revenue. 4. Proscratinate at work. Posted by: Oberon at October 13, 2006 03:03 PMALL gas taxes are paid at the pump. Now, procrastination on the clock--THERE'S a worthy goal! Posted by: Tully at October 13, 2006 03:25 PMWell, it would have to be a hefty enough tax to make other sources (e.g coal or solar) economic by comparison. And, as Tully says, it all ends up being paid at the pump. Although . . . this might be a way to get it in without political suicide -- count on voters' lack of economic understanding to fool them on why gas prices are up. ;-) Procrastination -- definitely a worthy goal, given it's close relationship to sloth. There's much to be said for the idea that sloth is the most under-appreciated human virtue. It is, after all, responsible for all human progress. Why was the wheel invented? Somebody was tired of dragging stuff around. Why was the automobile invented? Someone didn't want to have to muck out the stable any more. You get the idea. So you can not only procrastinate, you can feel virtuous at the same time! Posted by: wj at October 13, 2006 07:07 PMDon't mistake lazy with efficienct. I'm all for a very high gas tax. Whatever the national economy will bear. One dollar per gallon added tax would bring an extra $150B (not weighted for adverse economic factors) into the government coffers. Do I hear two? We have to cover those SS bills coming due. I have some control over my gasoline consumption at any rate. Posted by: Dennis at October 14, 2006 02:09 AMThank you, Dennis, for an honest reason to raise the gas tax. FOR THE MONEY! I've been a wee bit annoyed of late with gas-taxers who claimed their motive for $1/gallon tax on gasoline was to slow consumption and spur research into alt energy, and then proceed to scream and yell when gas goes up on its own. Posted by: Tully at October 14, 2006 10:56 AMOh, yeah, I almost forgot. Oberon, this post of yours that you placed up while comments were dead? Calculated Risk notes that the public debt rose a just a tad last year: about $574.3 billion (after subtracting surpluses in social security and other trust funds). You're lying. Calculated Risk did not make any such misstatement of fact, you did that on your own. The figure you cite includes ALL government "trust fund" surpluses including SS surpluses, as anyone who can read the linked Treasury figures could figure out in about 3 seconds. I don't accuse you of the following, but it always amuses me when the debt doomsayers scream and yell about the national debt, yet at the same time insist that nothing at all is wrong with Social Security. Future post upcoming on the public debt and how it gets misrepresented over at Stubborn Facts. Posted by: Tully at October 14, 2006 01:30 PMTully, If anyone is bored, there is always this to get a great laugh over what our adversaries are spewing. I suggest not combining the first subject with the last. As for the record: how about using the oil tax to create a hybrid between birds and humans. Then our off-spring can fly instead of drive. P.S. Tully, my imagined Clinton response to Chris Wallace's "North Korea accusation" was meant to be a bit humorous... Posted by: Maxtrue at October 14, 2006 04:34 PMAnymore I consider Clinton's real words to be a bit humorous! Posted by: Tully at October 14, 2006 07:05 PM |
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|