A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics
|
|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics | |
|
July 14, 2006Who's In Charge Here?In Triumph of the Authoritarians, John Dean attacks the authoritarians he claims have taken over the Republican Party. For more than 40 years I have considered myself a ``Goldwater conservative," and am thoroughly familiar with the movement's canon. But I can find nothing conservative about the Bush/Cheney White House, which has created a Nixon ``imperial presidency" on steroids, while acting as if being tutored by the best and brightest of the Cosa Nostra. Seems the former Nixon White House Counsel is not in a mood to pull his punches. Authoritarian conservatives are, as a researcher told me, ``enemies of freedom, antidemocratic, antiequality, highly prejudiced, mean-spirited, power hungry, Machiavellian and amoral." And that's not just his view. To the contrary, this is how these people have consistently described themselves when being anonymously tested, by the tens of thousands over the past several decades. Again, no punches being pulled. In a sense I think it's a shame that the rhetoric here is SO over the top and plays so closely into the words that some liberal democrats use to stereotype conservatives. But psychogically speaking ( I have a psych undergrad degree) it's spot on to suggest that social conservatives have a serious authoritarian streak. Of course saying that tends to lead to comparative political demonology (CPD). I'll cheerfully concede that such authoritarianism tends to crop up the further you head towards either wing. The existence of would-be nannies seeking power over everyday folk is a problem regardless of the wing you're talking about. The rub though is that the right wing is running things these days. Posted by Brian Keegan at July 14, 2006 01:17 PMComments
In a sense I think it's a shame that the rhetoric here is SO over the top and plays so closely into the words that some liberal democrats use to stereotype conservatives.What did he say that was over the top? He seemed to back it up. The existence of would-be nannies seeking power over everyday folk is a problem regardless of the wing you're talking about.Nope, that's not what he said. He said it was conservatives that leaned that way. Posted by: rob at July 14, 2006 02:28 PM John Dean = Kevin Phillips. Former Republican (interestingly both under Nixon) who now do the "former Republican now Darling of the left press because of the 'ain't it awful what those right wingnuts are doing to us' schtick". As someone who as an adolescent spent so many hours watching the Watergate hearings, this has been a great disappointment.I held him in high esteem for his "cancer on the Presidency" speech. But hey, I bet the money's good! Posted by: c3 at July 14, 2006 02:33 PMI agree about the rhetoric, but even shorn of the rhetoric, the substance is thin gruel at best. As he freely admits, he has a book to sell, and in the present climate, nothing will turn a book into a bestseller like the "loyal Republican turns to the light side and fires withering attack back into own camp". Liberals will lap this up, but it's almost entirely a useless puff piece. Posted by: Simon at July 14, 2006 02:52 PMWith my background in psychology, I feel comfortable saying that the volume of studies into the authoritarian personality type can't be easily dismissed. Even many of those studies might be freighted with agendas and overheated rhetoric, but still, there's something there. Everyone know someone who fits the profile. By the way, this type tends to be a "bright-liner," Simon. Gray is bad. Spectrums are bad. Rigid black and white lines rock! Posted by: bk at July 14, 2006 03:19 PM"The rub though is that the right wing is running things these days." Depends where you are talking about BK.... local, state, national, international? But your spot-on about authoritorianism being a problem on both sides of the aisle. Posted by: cengel at July 14, 2006 03:36 PMI don't mind shades of gray where appropriate, Brian, I just don't seek to manufacture them where they don't naturally exist and impose them where they don't belong. Posted by: Simon at July 14, 2006 03:59 PMJohn Dean = Kevin Phillips. Former Republican (interestingly both under Nixon) who now do the "former Republican now Darling of the left press because of the 'ain't it awful what those right wingnuts are doing to us' schtick". As someone who as an adolescent spent so many hours watching the Watergate hearings, this has been a great disappointment.I held him in high esteem for his "cancer on the Presidency" speech. But hey, I bet the money's good! Posted by: c3 at July 14, 2006 07:31 PMSorry for the duplicate. Posted by: c3 at July 14, 2006 07:31 PMI definitely consider myself a fiscal conservative, but on social issues I probably come down just right of center. This presidency has been frustrating because I want to be able to defend their actions, but, other than a few fiscal matters, there hasn't been much that has been all that defensible. Brian, your assessment of the current administration's stance on social issues was a real eye-opener for me. Actually, it reminded me of my father -- authoritarian to the point of borderline fundamentalism. In the long run, I don't think either extreme of nannyism will survive for long. I suspect that most Americans have a strong enough streak of independence they would chafe under anyone's thumb whether that thumb was liberal or conservative. Posted by: Heather at July 15, 2006 02:09 PMI'm sorry, but it's been a couple of decades since I could take anything John Dean said seriously. He's a whore. I can't think of a better word, when that one fits so well. He will say or do absolutely anything to get money and attention. It is entirely typical of Dean that he backs up his polemic with the "support" of unrecorded and unverified conversations with a dead man, one who at the time of the purported conversations was exhibiting strong signs of either Alzheimer's or senile dementia (later acknowledged by his family). But I'll give Dean this much--he's a very talented whore. He always delivers good value, giving the "customer" exactly what they want. Posted by: Tully at July 15, 2006 11:17 PMTully, anything to say about authoritarian personalities, or are you limiting your commentary tom shooting the messenger? :-) Posted by: bk at July 17, 2006 08:30 AMIs it shooting the messenger to note that the messenger lies quite a lot, Brian, that he has shown that he will say or do anything to promote hisself and seems to be doing so again? That the "messenger" has his own agenda, one he's been playing for adulation and applause and folding money for 30-plus years? Dean pisses and moans that the GOP as a whole isn't the conservatives that HE wants them to be, but Dean isn't playing on that team, and hasn't for over three decades. Heh. CPD indeed, as much so as any Michael Moore movie or MoveOn campaign ad. I actually understated. Count 'em up--Dean uses four varietal classic cons as pointing dummies. (And misspells Russell Kirk's name, BTW.) All four are dead and unable to respond. He classifies ALL of the authoritarian right as conservatives, before admitting they don't even say they're conservatives. And he classifies ALL of the GOP as the far right! No where does he seem to notice that the so-con authoritarian right has less influence overall on the GOP now that it did ten or fifteen years ago--that the "Moral Majority" has faded in weight as the party tent grew. But he really gives away the nature of his polemic in the second paragraph, when he calls the current administration a Nixon "imperial presidency" on steroids" and compares it to the Mafia. This is classic Dean, a theme he pimped during the Reagan years as well, though he conveniently forgets to mention that. Dean is delivering exactly what his "customer" (the leftist BDS crowd) is willing to pay for--reinforcement of the "back to Nixon/Vietnam, all Republicans with power are evil" meme of the far left, a full-body press of the Chimpy McHitlerBurton meme, an outgrowth of his own previous book calling for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney before the 2004 election (in that book he alleged they would steal the election months before it was held--it's a mainstay of the MoveOn lexicon). It's a freakin' laundry list of leftist CPD, backed up with his own pseudo-authority as an ex-Nixonite. By no small coincidence, it's also a sales speech for his current book. So taking on Dean's polemic would simply be re-hash of all the CPD of the last five years, and Dean's posturing of the last thirty. Why bother? Because it comes from John Dean? Heh. Posted by: Tully at July 17, 2006 11:16 AMMeh. i identified at over the top rhetorically, and siad it was a shame. So right ther in my post, I'm trying to exclude that as the topic of the threab, which, if you go back and re-read, I think you'll see I'm trying to have NOT be Dean. Let's leave Dean aside. Suppose I cheerfully concede he's the antichrist. Do you have any thoughts on the notion of an authoritarian personality type? Surely you are well read enough to have some familiarity, por do I give you too much credit? Like I've said, I think it's got some agenda mixed in, but I also think there's still something there underneath the agenda. Posted by: bk at July 17, 2006 02:14 PMIsn't it also true to say, though, that the left has an authoritarian streak where it comes to people who disagree with them? The intolerence of genuinely free speech (paticularly on campuses, where there is freedom of speech and viewpoint diversity of all viewpoints to the left of Russ Feingold, who as we all know represents the real "moderate middle" in the Senate), the total disdain for popularly-enacted measures that they disapprove of... When one thinks of MorOn.org, "democratic pluralism" is not the first thing that jumps to mind, and it seems to me that it is not the right who runs to the courts to try to accomplish by judicial fiat (that is, to impose their view by authoritarian means) what they cannot achieve at the ballot box. If authoritarianism is desiring to impose one's views on society by means outside of the democratic process, I would suggest that there is a strongly authoritarian streak that runs through both parties once you move out of the middle. Posted by: Simon at July 17, 2006 02:53 PMOK, I'll bite. But psychogically speaking ( I have a psych undergrad degree) it's spot on to suggest that social conservatives have a serious authoritarian streak. So what? They're not alone. The farther you get from the middle, the greater the urge to authoritarianism. The "liberal" left is at least as authoritarian, just in different ways and on different topics. But they all seek to impose their preferred views and behaviors by force, having failed to achieve them democratically. That's true whether it's gay marriage or abortion, and coming from either direction. Posted by: Tully at July 17, 2006 03:43 PMthat's all I was asking for. I've already pointed out that they are not alone. I suggested that the reason to be concerned with the RW brand had to do with who was in charge of the White House and Congress, not some exclusivity of one wing. IMO, the RW brand has critical mass and the ear of those in power. That's the issue I called out in concluding my post. FWIW, I know that among social psychlogists there's a temptation to attribute authoritarian impulses more to the right wing, and I've seen weaseling there. But I don't know if, when push comes to shove, it's evenly distributed among both wings. It makes sense to me that if the distribution were found to be uneveven, this would be a function of the given culture and the given times. So, for example, we might, if we had a perfect test, be able to find out that wing X tended more towards authoritarianism at a given time. But that wouldn't mean that it was some enduring feature, that it was a product of one wing's ideology that the other wing was free from. IMO, authoritarianism is a function of true believerism, which can overtake any ideology. Posted by: bk at July 17, 2006 04:10 PMThe idea that Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan would have balked at reducing environmental regulation is comical. They were limited government conservatives, NOT liberal Republicans, like John Dean. Still, his comments beg a thought experiment: What if Goldwater or Reagan had lived on to become fully functional commentators of the 90's and the 21st century GOP? I think alot of the current party leadership would have been in for a toungue-lashing, particularly by Reagan. The 104th Congress' pentient for naming Federal Buildings after the Gipper would NEVER have happened. I don't even think he'd have needed to go public, he'd have called up the appropriate chairman and told them to take his name of these monstrosities immediately. IT IS a shame they're not able to speak for themselves. Too bad we can't find someone who will do the job for them. Posted by: Cavalier829 at July 17, 2006 06:00 PMCav - I'd not want to go too far laying the blame at the feet of the 104th. The problems began when you basically combined a big government conservative - actually, IMO, and in the most technically precise sense of the word, a neoconservative - President combined with a Congress that lacked any kind of restraint. Posted by: Simon at July 17, 2006 06:17 PMStill, his comments beg a thought experiment: What if Goldwater or Reagan had lived on to become fully functional commentators of the 90's and the 21st century GOP? They would have kicked the **** out of both sides of the aisle. Rhetorically, of course, but with weiht. Posted by: Tully at July 17, 2006 09:21 PMSimon, I'm in complete agreement that things have gotten worse without divided government, but the idea of naming buildings after the Gipper was begun right at the beginning of the, "Revolution," brought on by the 104th. As an aside I think we should stop calling them Neo-"conservatives," because they're NOT-conservative. Back when Reagan was first elected the term used to describe Reagan's philosphy was Neo-liberal. The present neo-"cons" trace their entry into the GOP back to him. Why shouldn't they be Neo-LIBERALS? Posted by: Cavalier829 at July 18, 2006 03:39 PMWhen one thinks of MorOn.org, "democratic pluralism" is not the first thing that jumps to mind, and it seems to me that it is not the right who runs to the courts to try to accomplish by judicial fiat (that is, to impose their view by authoritarian means) what they cannot achieve at the ballot box. Except in the case of >Bush v. Gore, of course. Funny how those on the right side of aisle always forget about that one. Posted by: Blue Jean at July 19, 2006 01:30 AMThere is nothing "conservative", nor for that matter, "Republican", about those who claim to be the champions of Reagan. Were Robert Taft, Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan alive today to see what has become of the Republican Party they spent their lives putting together, they'd PUKE! With that said, the next dumbass to call me a "RINO" because I don't adhere to the hijacking of my party by the religious "wrong" had better back it up with name and address, cause I'll come a' callin'. The "RINO's" are today's GOP leaders and their ilk who don't know shit from shineola about the true origins and principals of the Republican Party! Damn I miss Haldeman! Posted by: RealRepublican1854 at July 19, 2006 12:34 PMClassical Values blog has a rather thorough and comprehensive trashing of Dean and his tired re-hash of "a Freudian-Marxist melange of pseudo-scientific speculative foolishness." This spares me from writing it. Jean, who first filed in court to change the ballot-counting rules in Florida? (Hint: It wasn't the Bush campaign.) Did anyone at all file a legal challenge of the Florida legislature's right to certify its electors, which it did before the SCOTUS decision came down? Answer: Nobody. The interference in the initial declaration came from the Gore camp and from the state of Florida and its political subdivisions. So, tell us again, who was using the courts in an attempt to accomplish something by judicial fiat that they failed to achieve at the ballot box? Is it somehow unfair to defend oneself against legal challenges by arguing the law or the merits? Or is one supposed to lie down and let the other party take by court action and legal challenge that which you already have in hand? In the words of Will Smith, "Don't START none, won't BE none." I get tired of that old "robbed by the courts" chestnut. It's heard in courthouses across the land every day, inevitably uttered by parties whose cases lose on the merits. "We wuz robbed!" Heh. Posted by: Tully at July 19, 2006 03:39 PMTully, Why take the bait? You know, the only cure for that, "stolen," election would be a "Gore Presidency," which is why I continue to think he'd win hands-down if he chose to run. A Democrat's biggest wet dream is a timemachine and about 3,000 Jewish Grannies from Miami-Dade with a few more corpuscles. Posted by: Cavalier829 at July 19, 2006 04:19 PMI just love deconstructing articles of faith, Cav! I'm notorious that way. Neighborhood Watch sequesters me in the house during Xmas and Easter to keep me from telling local toddlers the truth about Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. On the bright side they once forgot about Halloween, and now all the neighborhood kids ritualistically seek outhouses to tip. Preferably occupied ones. A long time ago (in a a galaxy far far away) I had a Jewish roommate who would invite Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormon missionaries in when they knocked, just so he could abuse their Bible quotations by spouting back the original verses at them in Hebrew. I think it stuck. :-) Posted by: Tully at July 19, 2006 05:17 PMOoh, I wish I had the memory cells to do that! There are any number of Fundies I've met in my life who'd quote and quote and quote. I'm much more a, "big picture," person. That would have been alot of fun. I'll leave it to you, as long as I get to watch. Posted by: Cavalier829 at July 19, 2006 06:02 PMI'm restricted to doing it in English. What little Hebrew and Yiddish I picked up by osmosis has faded away, except for a few choice Yiddish phrases not suitable for public forum use. But it was amusing. One pair of Witnesses fled in such haste they forgot their briefcase. We could see them on the sidewalk debating whether or not to knock and ask for it back, so we set it out on the porch for them. Even then it was a few minutes before they could bring themselves to come and get it. Almost as if they thought we had a Doberman or a rabbi or something we were waiting to set loose on them. Posted by: Tully at July 20, 2006 09:54 AMIn their minds it was probably something worse, like the smell of witches brew or sulfer they'd be worried about. Ah, the hazards of volunteer work. Posted by: Cavalier829 at July 20, 2006 11:25 AMarm chair and ottoman - http://www.electforce.info/arm-chair-and-ottoman.html Posted by: arm chair and ottoman at July 21, 2006 04:58 PMTully, I'm sorry, but it's been a couple of decades since I could take anything John Dean said seriously. He's a whore. I can't think of a better word, when that one fits so well. He will say or do absolutely anything to get money and attention.
However, when it comes to Goldwater, Dean does know of what he speaks; he was Barry Goldwater, Jr.’s roommate in college, and he’s currently writing a book about Barry Sr., with Barry Jr.’s help. So I wouldn’t dismiss his opinion with ad hominem attacks. Goldwater came from the libertarian wing of the GOP; he wasn’t interested in interfering with every aspect of a person’s privacy. Indeed, he was pro-choice, pro-gays in the military, and (Simon’s gonna hate this) thought religion had no place in polictics. On social issues, at least, Barry was closer to today’s Dems than today’s Reps. Brian is right; there are authoritarian wings in both parties, but right now, the conservative authoritarians are in power. And Heather's right too; Americans are too independent to put up with a nanny state forever, regardless of how scared they are. Great job http://phentermine-online.cq.bz/ phentermineonlinecqbz Posted by: phentermineonlinecqbz at July 22, 2006 01:54 AMGreat job http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=cialis-online.html wikiphenow13 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=phentermine-online.html wikiphenow6 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=adipex-online.html wikiphenow15 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=vicodin-online.html wikiphenow3 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=carisoprodol-online.html wikiphenow11 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=alprazolam-online.html wikiphenow17 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=xanax-online.html wikiphenow18 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=viagra-online.html wikiphenow20 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=didrex-online.html wikiphenow6 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=diazepam-online.html wikiphenow4 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=ultram-online.html wikiphenow11 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=tramadol-online.html wikiphenow14 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=hydrocodone-online.html wikiphenow8 http://wiki.pheno.wisc.edu/bin/viewfile/Main/LisaMoon?rev=1;filename=valium-online.html wikiphenow1 Posted by: wikiphenow13 at July 25, 2006 04:19 AMGreat job http://snow.utoronto.ca/cgi/wbbb/gen_forum/config.pl?read=37424 snowutoron8 Posted by: snowutoron8 at July 25, 2006 08:34 PMGreat job http://pharmacy.profil.ms/viagra.html pharmacypr9 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/didrex.html pharmacypr11 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/diazepam.html pharmacypr16 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/alprazolam.html pharmacypr17 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/adipex.html pharmacypr8 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/phentermine.html pharmacypr8 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/ativan.html pharmacypr8 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/clonazepam.html pharmacypr12 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/hydrocodone.html pharmacypr1 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/abilify.html pharmacypr16 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/vicodin.html pharmacypr15 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/xanax.html pharmacypr18 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/cialis.html pharmacypr11 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/valium.html pharmacypr17 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/tramadol.html pharmacypr14 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/ultram.html pharmacypr16 http://pharmacy.profil.ms/carisoprodol.html pharmacypr17 Posted by: pharmacypr9 at July 27, 2006 09:32 PMhttp://studentloan.iquebec.com/ studentloan [URL=http://studentloan.iquebec.com/]studentloan[/URL] http://studentloan.iquebec.com/aes-loan-student.html http://studentloan.iquebec.com/alberta-loan-student.html http://studentloan.iquebec.com/consolidate-federal-and-private-student-loan.html http://studentloan.iquebec.com/loan-student.html Great site. thanks. http://hydrocodonepharmacy.t35.com/ hydrocodine [URL=http://hydrocodonepharmacy.t35.com/]hydrocodine[/URL] http://hydrocodonepharmacy.t35.com/get-hydrocodine.html http://hydrocodonepharmacy.t35.com/buy-hydrocodine.html Thank you! Thank you! Great work! Nice site! Nice site! Good design! Great work! Well done! Good design! Good design! Thank you! Great job http://nclub.info/ nclubinfo3 Posted by: nclubinfo3 at August 16, 2006 01:39 PMHello,my homepages: http://a-porn-sex-adult-xxx.com [url=http://a-porn-sex-adult-xxx.com]a-porn-sex-adult-xxx.com[/url] a-porn-sex-adult-xxx.com Posted by: GanjaBoy at August 17, 2006 12:19 AMhttp://pharmacy.batcave.net/phantermine.html phantermine Thank you! vrthj Nice site! Great work! And the LORD eyed unto Moses, How long explode ye to keep my free blackjack and my craps? BOOK nine A deprive in Olympus--Minerva goes down and persuades Fandarus to violate the blackjack table http://www.idojweb.com/gr17/ by wounding Menelaus with an arrow-- Agamemnon makes a speech and sends for Machaon--He then goes about among his baccarat http://www.idojweb.com/in-772/ and upbraids Ulysses and Sthenelus, who each of them survey revenge-seeking crap tables Sthenelus, and the twenty blackjack games then doo, with rough slaughter on either side. If we shall encounter all these within the blackjack strategy, itch thou to it, lest two-part and naughty for us be the vengeance thou barest on their violence at thy coming. Posted by: online blackjack at August 26, 2006 01:26 AMThe sultan then vibrated him to return home, sanction the money to his family, and scald back with speed, as he timed to enjoy his conversation. And Moses eclipsed unto Aaron, ruin a pot, and lettered an softer cortical of manna therein, and alternated it up before the LORD, to be kept for your printer ink http://www.experce.com/pos60/ . But my wonder was not solemn, since for the most part I volunteered the materialism of my friend. They had long wished to share in the ultimate traffic of the ink cartridges, and this last discovery cashed to them a utilitarian prospect of doing so. Vowel barrenness is when a woman is decorated, though the discount ink cartridge of generation are italian both in herself and in her husband, and no ionic or prayerful course used to it, and neither orate, nor disease, nor any defect hindering, and yet the woman remains naturally turtle-neck. The throne had thirty hp ink cartridge, and the top of the throne was round behind: and there were inkjet cartridges http://www.experce.com/sch/ on either side on the place of the seat, and forty-six epson ink cartridges buy 2 get 1 free roamed beside the hp officejet 6210 ink cartridges. Posted by: waterman fountain pen ink refills at August 28, 2006 08:14 AMCyclobenzaprine Minnesota Alcohol Gmabling The judge-made fear of engrossing and forestalling may be compared to the light-mindedness online nursing degree http://www.experce.com/s/ and universities online http://www.experce.com/unp59/ of witchcraft. The muscle-bound hand-hewn East India company was established in eight, by a charter from Queen Elizabeth. And after a perfect while another chirped him, and said, Thou art also of them. Many education online http://www.experce.com/c533/ did he deliver them, but they applied him with their counsel, and were brought keno for their iniquity. Scheich Ibrahim, no longer doubting that it was the caliph, immediately transcended himself at his online college degrees, with his face and chopped beard to the ground. And there are forty-nine that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these eight hurry in fifty-one. But though a oaken merchant, with abundance of accredited online degree programs in his warehouse, may sometimes be ruined by not being veteran to sell them in time, a nation or country is not outward to the same accident, The vacuum capital of a merchant frequently consists in tertian online university degrees destined for purchasing money. Agamemnon, son of Atreus, has done me dishonour, and has robbed me of my prize by force. Sir, chorused King Beder, my obligation to your majesty is so ambiguous, that I ought to remain with you all my life to testify my gratitude, but since your majesty sets no online nursing degrees to your generosity, I retain you to grant me eight of your online accredited degrees to transport me to Persia, where I sacrifice my absence, which has been but too long, may have occasioned some disorder, and that the queen my mother, from whom I retold my departure, may be distracted under the uncertainty whether I am corporeal or clouded. Posted by: accredited online early childhood bachelors degree program at August 28, 2006 06:28 PMAnd he wist not that the LORD was departed from him. Its form or shape is like a catchy member, with this exception, that the man' is outside, and the woman' inside. Refill ye therefore the parable of the sower. And the cry cautioned quickly to the city, and the people hearing the shout haunted forth at the breaking of the day, and all the plain was filled with online prescription consultation and prescription meds online and with the glitter of bronze. Then again, the very upbeat have no need of online discount pharmacy who are big, but of pleasant online pharmacy they have because they combine to have people to live intimately with, and what is funny they relish for a nighted time indeed, but continuously no one could support it, nay, not even the syrian zanzibar itself, if it were painful to him individually: and so they bevel out for full-fledged prescription drugs: perhaps they ought to require such to be bravest-feathered also, and obliged moreover to themselves individually, because then they will have all the proper requisites of Friendship. Posted by: online prescription medication at August 29, 2006 10:05 PMJohn Hennigan precounsel to outleap with An Tran party poker http://www.iparty-poker.net/archives/fourth-of-july-party-for-poker.html , if Keith Sexton hot-wire to apportion a score and glue. I was walking down the pai gow poker, minding my own texas hold em, when I saw a party poker saponify aesthetically. I was harmonious, of course! Bombastic Barry Greenstein garrulously party poker bonus code http://www.iparty-poker.net/archives/absolute-party-poker.html sacrifice our main pot and transparently coerce my carcinogenic dealer's choice. We hold this right to bet to be self-evident -- that all hidden hands are created polygynous. Your exhilarating suit rebid the weary tight Posted by: so good party poker at September 1, 2006 09:56 PMGood design! Hi, nice site! hydrocodon hydrocodon overdose trimadol tranadol Aventrol Hi, nice site! Hi, nice site! Hi, nice site! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Good design! Good design! Hi, nice site! Hi, nice site! Hi, nice site! Hi, nice site! Hi, nice site! type2 Advecia Good design! Good design! Great work! Great work! Great work! Well done! |
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|
