|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
June 13, 2006President goes to BaghdadYou know, when you're the #1 Al Qaeda target, it takes some stones to fly, by helicopter, into a country with a lot of angry insurgents and terrorists who want you dead, no matter how many soldiers you've got to protect you. Who was the last president to visit anything resembling a forward theater of operations? Call me a toady, call me a partisan, call me whatever you want, but it's times like this that I'm proud to have voted for President Bush, twice. How better to demonstrate his commitment to what he started in Iraq then by going there as soon as the new, democratically elected prime minister had completed the installation of his cabinet, to again voice America's resolve to stay the course. In the President's own words: I have come to not only look you in the eye; I've also come to tell you that when America gives its word, it will keep its word.Posted by PatHMV at June 13, 2006 11:53 AM Comments
I'm still quite proud NOT to have voted for him. But I think this visit was a very smart calculated risk, especially coming so close on the heels of slaying Zarquawi. It looks very bad for al quaeda, making their post-zarquawi-slaying comments seem like hollow posturing, at least for the time being. Perception IS only perception, but it matters quite a bit to the type of battle AQ is trying to conduct. Of course, Bush can't win with his opponents on this matter. If he doesn't visit, it's "If Iraq isn't in such bad shape, why won't Bush go there" and if he does go, it can be spun variously as foolhardy, unnecessarily provocative, to no good end, etc. I've got a little premonition that tells me public opinion on the war is going to start to tick up over the next few months absent a signature catastrophe. But I don't think my premonitions have a better track record than my guesses. I should probably listen to my cynical side, which says that public opinion will continue to inversely correlate with gas prices. Posted by: bk at June 13, 2006 12:19 PMI share your premonition, Brian, mostly because I think the President's approval ratings have historically gone up when he is seen in public, actively defending and promoting his actions. His ratings go down when he bunkers down in the White House on the defensive. He's decided it's time to start fighting back again (witness the hiring of Tony Snow), so approval ratings will go up. Just in time for mid-terms? Boy, that would be some coincidence, huh? Posted by: PatHMV at June 13, 2006 12:24 PMAnd politics aside, it really does take some stones to fly into Baghdad on a helicopter. I have tremendous admiration for all of those who do it, most especially the guys and gals who do it every single day. Posted by: PatHMV at June 13, 2006 12:25 PMI bet that's one flight the boys at Baghdad Int'l security searched quite throughly indeed before anyone was allowed to re-board the aircraft. Zarqawi's destruction (and the largely unreported but considerable damage to the jihadi and insurgent networks that has followed it) gives the new Iraqi government a window for some very positive movement. Perception may be only perception, but the insurgents depend on the media for all their real victories. They can't win on the battlefield, only in public perception. Posted by: Tully at June 13, 2006 01:01 PMI still have buyer's remorse, but it's a good move and an appropriate one, IMO. Posted by: Mathew at June 13, 2006 01:05 PMDamn you, bk! You stole my opening line. For all my misgivings about the guy, this is kind of thing that reminds me of why I used to say, "I wouldn't vote for him, but I wouldn't mind hanging out with him." (If he weren't a former alcoholic, it would be "have a beer with him.") Re: the search, I'm picturing a tightly guarded room containing every object allowed back onto the helicopter, including articles of clothing. Everyone going on the flight enters naked, not even a wristwatch, to dress and get all their gear before boarding. After that, they walk single file to the chopper down the middle of a 40 foot aisle formed by two lines of tighly spaced, heavily armed guards on either side. No one gets within 20 feet of any of them. Posted by: WHQ at June 13, 2006 01:37 PMI do agree that it's a great move, for reasons of both personal PR and public morale, but it doesn't exactly make me regret not voting for him. Posted by: Rafique Tucker at June 13, 2006 05:22 PMOh, and although I didn't vote for him, and I have major policy disagreements with him, I've never had any animus against him. So I have no problem saying "Not bad, sir. Not bad at all." Posted by: Rafique Tucker at June 13, 2006 05:26 PMSo did he land on an aircraft carrier with a "Mission Accomplished" banner already hanging? Posted by: JP at June 13, 2006 07:19 PMTo a partisan, it's a brave morale booster for the toops. To a critic, it's a cynical photo op for domestic consumption that drew security forces away from actual work. Ho hum. Bush is irrelevant. The future is what happens after him, and it's already begun. Posted by: Greg63 at June 14, 2006 12:08 PMIm not a partisan or a critic, but an objective. This is a brave morale booster for the troops and a photo-op, it is also a sign that the USA is behind the Iraqi people 100% and that we support the government. Even though they are instituting Sharia law in the way Afganistan and Saudi Arabia have. Posted by: Dan at June 14, 2006 12:50 PMIn my humble opinion (and mind you, it's only MY OPINION and should not be ridiculed if you don't agree with it, as some are prone to do on this site) is that the President went to Iraq not for political gain (what gain would he have? he can't run again and the underlings who are running this Fall need to make their own cases if they're true to themselves) but rather because I think he is a person who truely cares about the boys and girls out there fighting for democracy. I really think the man is sincere and does care about these kids. For this, I say, "good job sir". Posted by: RealRepublican1854 at June 15, 2006 04:42 AM |
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|