|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
May 23, 2006Laws are like sausagesLaws made like sausage turn out to be baloney ''Laws are like sausages,'' said Otto von Bismarck famously. ''It's better not to see them being made.'' That's probably true even for good laws and good sausages. But there are times when the law or the sausage seems to represent the dubious process of its manufacture all too faithfully. In a word: It smells. And the last week of lawmaking in the Senate, which is expected to produce ''comprehensive immigration reform'' by the end of today or tomorrow, has been especially odiferous. The Senate makes immigration sausage. Yes, this really is how it usually works. Posted by Tully at May 23, 2006 10:37 PMComments
There was a case while Scalia was on the D.C. Circuit that involved a Federal regulation of the processed meat industry, giving rise to the quip in Our Hero's opinion that "the case before us allows us to simultaneously test both parts of Bismark's aphorism that those fond of laws and sausages should not look too closely at how either are made" (or words to that effect). Posted by: Simon at May 23, 2006 10:55 PMWell, at least the Senate sausage won't kill you. Yet another example in learning how to interpret polspeak. If you have to say that it's a comprehensive bill, then... Heard this am on the radio "opponents say that a fence is not the answer." Left me wondering, how come opponents get to say stuff that that? Especially since #1, to my knowledge no one has said that a fence is "THE" answer, and #2, repeating the "not the answer" mantra lets opponents off the hook for explaining why it would be ineffective. Quickly and effectively obscured then, is the most important point that people need to grasp about the issue...which is that people disagree about what "the answer" is because they don't agree about which components of illegal immigration should be considered problems. Posted by: bk at May 24, 2006 09:05 AMto complete the analogy: then to deal with stench of sausage turned baloney, lawmakers inject it with perfumes that only leads it to become toxic and further steer the goodness from its original intent. this goes for many laws, regulations, deregualtions, re-regulations, amendments and so on. Posted by: John at May 24, 2006 10:55 AMI agree that over staying your visa should be less of an infraction than deliberately and illegally entering the US. English should be required and time residing here only counted towards citizenship when one's status was legal. Serious felonies should count more than lesser ones. Fool proof tracking of citizenship candidates is necessary. Most of the bickering is inconsequential. I think the best we can do is to let most in now, shut the door and set a date when illegals will be treated more harshly. ID cards will probably have to be required for all Americans especially should terrorism strike again. Posted by: maxtrue at May 24, 2006 06:01 PM |
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
July 4: Gasbag Edition
Independent Open Thread: Whatcha Doing This Weekend? Long Tail Controversy and Explanations Canadian Human Rights Commission No, Slavery Wasn't Competive With Free Labor Back online Irish Blogger Charged For Blogging Friday open thread Headline: Obama and Clinton Together in Unity There Is No EPA Document, There Is No EPA Document
|