A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition. Send story ideas to cf at centristcoalition . com

Explore the Centrist Blogosphere, an aggregator which lists the latest posts by Centrist bloggers

These bloggers are part of the Centrist Coalition:
Ambivablog
Another Opinion
Austin Centrist
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Maverick Views
The Moderate Voice
Moderate Voters
Stubborn Facts

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Independent Nation

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

May 23, 2006

Laws are like sausages

Laws made like sausage turn out to be baloney

''Laws are like sausages,'' said Otto von Bismarck famously. ''It's better not to see them being made.'' That's probably true even for good laws and good sausages. But there are times when the law or the sausage seems to represent the dubious process of its manufacture all too faithfully. In a word: It smells. And the last week of lawmaking in the Senate, which is expected to produce ''comprehensive immigration reform'' by the end of today or tomorrow, has been especially odiferous.

The Senate makes immigration sausage. Yes, this really is how it usually works.

Posted by Tully at May 23, 2006 10:37 PM
Comments

There was a case while Scalia was on the D.C. Circuit that involved a Federal regulation of the processed meat industry, giving rise to the quip in Our Hero's opinion that "the case before us allows us to simultaneously test both parts of Bismark's aphorism that those fond of laws and sausages should not look too closely at how either are made" (or words to that effect).

Posted by: Simon at May 23, 2006 10:55 PM

Well, at least the Senate sausage won't kill you.
That really is an interesting analogy.

Posted by: Rafique Tucker at May 24, 2006 02:15 AM

Yet another example in learning how to interpret polspeak. If you have to say that it's a comprehensive bill, then...

Heard this am on the radio "opponents say that a fence is not the answer." Left me wondering, how come opponents get to say stuff that that? Especially since #1, to my knowledge no one has said that a fence is "THE" answer, and #2, repeating the "not the answer" mantra lets opponents off the hook for explaining why it would be ineffective.

Quickly and effectively obscured then, is the most important point that people need to grasp about the issue...which is that people disagree about what "the answer" is because they don't agree about which components of illegal immigration should be considered problems.

Posted by: bk at May 24, 2006 09:05 AM

to complete the analogy:

then to deal with stench of sausage turned baloney, lawmakers inject it with perfumes that only leads it to become toxic and further steer the goodness from its original intent.

this goes for many laws, regulations, deregualtions, re-regulations, amendments and so on.

Posted by: John at May 24, 2006 10:55 AM

I agree that over staying your visa should be less of an infraction than deliberately and illegally entering the US.

English should be required and time residing here only counted towards citizenship when one's status was legal.

Serious felonies should count more than lesser ones. Fool proof tracking of citizenship candidates is necessary.

Most of the bickering is inconsequential. I think the best we can do is to let most in now, shut the door and set a date when illegals will be treated more harshly. ID cards will probably have to be required for all Americans especially should terrorism strike again.

Posted by: maxtrue at May 24, 2006 06:01 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Declare Your Independence - Unity08.com

Archives


Recent Entries

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661