|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
April 24, 2006If This Is Kansas, You Must Be a Methodist!Well, not really, but this Religious Demographics Map Set is cool. Hat tip to Tyler Cowen at Marginal Revolution for poining out this site, hosted by Valparaiso. It's sortable by a variety of faiths and classess of faith. Baptist dominate the south, but are surrounded on their borders by the Catholics, while the Lutherans have a northern midwest hegemony, and the Mormons own Utah. The Jews have a foothold in NE, NY, Pa, NJ, and South Florida. The Methodists have a good hold on the very middlest west, and all the other faiths look to be relative also-rans, at a glance. Check it out. Posted by Kranky Kritter at April 24, 2006 12:44 PMComments
Wow. Actually, in Kansas we seem to have every denomination, although Catholics are the "leader," edging out the Methodists in all the population centers. My home county shows up on every single map except "reformed" and "Amish." (And the Amish are in the county next door.) Posted by: Tully at April 24, 2006 01:09 PMThis is a good find. I will bookmark it for future reference. Thanks for posting this. Posted by: LASunsett at April 24, 2006 02:11 PMWhat's with all the Eastern Orthodox churches in southern Alaska? Did they come over the Bering Strait or something? Posted by: WHQ at April 24, 2006 05:07 PMBrian, this is way too cool! I've bookmarked for future use. One of the more amusing things...click on "Unitarian"...I don't think anyone would be surprised to see where they dominate, but what's funny is the one purple spot in the South--it's Gainesville, Florida--home to the University of Florida. Very large Unitarian population... This is just too cool. Thanks! Posted by: AR at April 24, 2006 05:33 PMWhat's up w/ all of the Presbyterians in Northern Alaska? Posted by: AR at April 24, 2006 05:35 PMAnd the Quakers in Alaska? I need to study AK a little more closely...it almost looks like it was settled based on religious adherence. Kind of like the Quakers picked up and went to Central Alaska, Presyterians to the North, and Orthodox in the South. Of course, I guess it is a percentage of the population and these could be very remote areas where it's "belong to this church or you don't have anywhere to go." Posted by: AR at April 24, 2006 05:38 PMOne very imprtant thing to notice densitywise is that different religions/viewpoints are graphed at different density rates. Dark color blips for unitarians means something very different quantitatively for unitarians than it does for catholics or baptists. The rates are chosen based on the range of density of each faith. This is necessary to display the relevant regional variation within the group being graphed. So the "domination" of unitarians in, say Fla, is only relative to unitarian population in other areas. Unitarians top out at 1.5% of population in their "dominant" areas. Compared to other faiths they are, as I said before, also-rans. Within the also-ran faiths, since the percent ranges that are graphed are so low, you can see darker blips that are probably attributable to a single strong community/temple/mosque/church of that faith. Posted by: bk at April 25, 2006 09:55 AMAbel, many farming communities at the turn of the century sent "colonies" to Alaska to grab free land, as cheap land was scarce in their areas and their younger generations had no other real options. Farming communities were pretty religiously homogenous at the time. Similarly, we have large Amish and Mennonite communities in my area, who came out after the Civil War when Pennsylvania and Ohio got too crowded. Check the "Church Bodies" map and "Religious Adherents" maps, and the overall picture gets a bit more clear. Posted by: Tully at April 25, 2006 10:19 AMVery interesting. From a Baptist perspective the "buckle" of the bible belt isn't Tulsa but Abilene. It would be interesting to look at oddest religious matches (politician/electorate) in recent memory. Posted by: c3 at April 25, 2006 05:17 PMFrom a Baptist perspective the "buckle" of the bible belt isn't Tulsa but Abilene. Yeah, but Six Flags Over Jesus is still in Tulsa. :-P Or is that too much of an inside joke? |
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
July 4: Gasbag Edition
Independent Open Thread: Whatcha Doing This Weekend? Long Tail Controversy and Explanations Canadian Human Rights Commission No, Slavery Wasn't Competive With Free Labor Back online Irish Blogger Charged For Blogging Friday open thread Headline: Obama and Clinton Together in Unity There Is No EPA Document, There Is No EPA Document
|