|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
March 24, 2006I think they're turning PortugueseEarlier in the week, Jon posted this summary of a bill before Parliament in England. I grew up in England, and I still have friends and relatives there, which makes me anything but a disinterested observer. For those reasons, and a few others, I read the bill with great concern, concerns I have put together in I think they’re turning Portuguese: The stealthy emasculation of the royal prerogative and the expansion of executive power in Britain. This essay examines the scope of the bill, its internal protections, and its effect, concluding that this represents a major (and unwise) change in the British Constitution, undertaken either by stealth or without consideration of the consequences, depending on whether its consequences are intentional or accidental. I also examine the Constitutions of Britain's twelve Maasctricht co-signatories and find that such a commingling of the legislative and executive functions is so far beyond the mainstream of European constitutional norms that it would be unconstitional in every other Maastricht signatory but Portugal (hence the title) This is still very much a draft, and I would welcome feedback and comments. We are so used to the idea that human progress is an "excelsior ratchet," a constant process of moving onwards and upwards, that we are loath to contemplate the idea that a major western country in this day and age could become more authoritarian, but however well-intentioned its genesis, I think that is exactly what this bill opens the door to. Posted by Simon at March 24, 2006 05:56 PMComments
The more I read about this, the more I think of a return to allowing dictatorial powers that was prevalent in many pre-WWII European systems. Of course, you see what that got. This is an incredibally bad idea. While Blair may not abuse such power (just as likely that he will), some other PM could wreck all kinds of havoc before Parliament could reign them in. I think history has shown that supreme executive power is not a good idea in most cases. Posted by: Jim M at March 24, 2006 07:16 PMI would really like to hear a clear statement about this from the Blair administration, to hear from them just what the hell they were thinking. Posted by: PatHMV at March 24, 2006 09:36 PM |
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
July 4: Gasbag Edition
Independent Open Thread: Whatcha Doing This Weekend? Long Tail Controversy and Explanations Canadian Human Rights Commission No, Slavery Wasn't Competive With Free Labor Back online Irish Blogger Charged For Blogging Friday open thread Headline: Obama and Clinton Together in Unity There Is No EPA Document, There Is No EPA Document
|