|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
February 25, 2006H2O: It's not just for drinkingBelieve it or not, the USA has one of the largest reserves on the planet of a highly prized liquid resource. Fresh Water! (I'm talking about the Great Lakes by the way.) Interesting enough, water is also a major part of energy production. I was over on theoildrum.com , and on one of their threads a commenter said: “...My company is currently suspending drilling operations in Oklahoma due to lack of available water. State, municipal and private water owners have all told us that they will no longer sell water to us. We are experiencing similar problems in Colorado, Wyoming and New Mexico, but not to the degree we have encountered in Oklahoma. I knew they used water in oil and gas drilling, but evidently they use substantial quantities. On the other hand, I have to wonder if the reason water was withheld from the drilling company was because it was a scarce resource, or because their operations caused problems for locals. I have previously read about problems with natural gas drilling operations bad habits. Evidently they pressurize the bore holes to fracture the rock and let the gas seep out. If you have a nearby water well, the water can become undrinkable, or your equipment could be violently expelled from the ground. Here is a graph of natural gas production in the USA Water is also a problem when it comes to alternative fuel production. Large quantities of water are used during the creation of ethanol and during the Fischer-Tropsch coal to gasoline process. Large amounts are also used in the extracting of oil from oil shale and tar sand. The quality of effluent from these processes is also a problem. If you're in an area where water is scarce, dumping polluted water is not going to make you popular. Then there was the little problem France had with its nuclear power plants. Seems that a recent drought endangered their ability to produce power. Everyone calls it “nuclear” power but it's steam that makes the turbines spin. No water means no steam. No steam means no power. I was raised in the northeast, and spent the second half of my life in the south. To little water was never really a problem for me. In both cases I always lived the proverbial stones throw from a major lake or river. Every decade or so there were some dry years, but I never went thirsty. In fact, rainfall rates in Alabama are occasionally measured in inches per hour. There is a reason the TVA built so many dams around here, and the road side ditches are 5 foot deep. That's not the story in a lot of other places, water rights are the stuff of hot debate. An that debate is probably going to get hotter. The Colorado River, for instance, no longer runs to the sea. Heavy use of the river as an irrigation source has desiccated the lower course of the river. The Rio Grande is also in danger of becoming extinct. While climate change predictions say evaporation of soil moisture should increase in already dry areas. That's not a good thing. Population growth is already putting pressure on existing water resources in some Western and Midwestern states, as home owners, agriculture and industry compete for water. As population grows, more people means more water requirements. Posted by BobJYoung at February 25, 2006 12:53 PMComments
Los Angeles swallowed the Colorado River long ago. (Ask Jack Nicholson. Hee hee!) Steamboats used to come up the Rio Grande into New Mexico until the drought of 1874, when the vegetation died and the sandbars shifted. States suing other states for violating water rights and taking more than their share have been going on since before most of them were states. Water may be a renewable resource, but it is not an infinite resource. The rich desert nations have the sense to build their power plants and desalinization plants next door to each other. Posted by: Tully at February 25, 2006 07:09 PMLocally there are plans to build a desalination plant that would use the cooling water of the conventional powerplant next door. But this has been on the drawing board since 1998. The main problem right now is that they need buyers for the plant's entire output, since it's most efficient at full output. These are definately problems to solve. But since such a concentration lives on the coasts, nukes combined with desal plants might work. Posted by: JonBuck at February 25, 2006 11:16 PMOne problem with using water in the extraction of oil is that it becomes lost water. It won't be able to be used again. If we pump billions of gallons of usable water underground to help extract oil, that is billions of gallons of water that can not be used in the natural recycling supply of water. There is plenty of water on the planet. Problem is that most of it is not fresh. The water is just not where we need it. Posted by: Jim M at February 26, 2006 02:10 PMI thought oil and water don't mix. Posted by: bk at February 26, 2006 02:23 PMI think that's why it's so important, Brian. The water doesn't mix with the oil, and so the water pressure forces the oil out from the porus rocks and into the well. Or something like that. Posted by: PatHMV at February 26, 2006 04:36 PMRight, but what I'm wondering is how such practices take water out of supply if the substances don't mix. Presumedly if they have a natural aversion to combining, you've got a head start on re-using the water later on, say when it makes its way back into the acquifer or if you collect it and filter it. So I'm wondering why using water to collect oil ruins the water. Maybe there is something in the oil that's toxic or bad tasting that tends to stay with the water instead of the oil when they are mixed at high pressure, I dunno. Just a layman's guess, but it seems it'd have to attach itself pretty vociferously to make distillation impossible. Posted by: bk at February 27, 2006 09:20 AMOil and water do not mix, for the most part. The problem is, you can't just pump the water back out and skim it and get the oil out. You end up with contamination measured in parts per billion. While not visible, there is mixing on a smaller scale. Plus, there are other chemical reactions that occur. Plus, your bigger problem is the actual extraction. The reason the water is used at all is because there is not enough natural pressure to pump the oil to the surface. So, in order to get the water out, you will have to find something that is denser then water; but not toxic, just to force the water back out. Posted by: Jim M at February 27, 2006 10:39 AMI forgot to add, this water does not make it back to the standard aquifer. Water is pulled by a gravity sitation into the aquifer from the surface. The majority of the oil source are well below the aquifer level. The water would not migrate to the aquifer from these locations. Posted by: Jim M at February 27, 2006 10:43 AM |
Archives
July 2008
June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
July 4: Gasbag Edition
Independent Open Thread: Whatcha Doing This Weekend? Long Tail Controversy and Explanations Canadian Human Rights Commission No, Slavery Wasn't Competive With Free Labor Back online Irish Blogger Charged For Blogging Friday open thread Headline: Obama and Clinton Together in Unity There Is No EPA Document, There Is No EPA Document
|