A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition. Send story ideas to cf at centristcoalition . com

Explore the Centrist Blogosphere, an aggregator which lists the latest posts by Centrist bloggers

These bloggers are part of the Centrist Coalition:
Ambivablog
Another Opinion
Austin Centrist
Charging RINO
Donklephant
Maverick Views
The Moderate Voice
Moderate Voters
Stubborn Facts

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Independent Nation

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

February 15, 2006

More Cheney

Jeff Greenfield.

(CNN) -- What did you see when you saw the story about Vice-President Cheney's hunting accident?

If you were a comedy writer, you saw definitive proof of the existence of God.

If you hold the Bush Administration in minimum high regard, you saw enough metaphors to power a Ph.D. thesis: a reckless, inept use of force directed at the wrong target, compounded by a cover-up.

If you support the administration, you saw the press in full hysteria, "going nuts" (as a FOX News personality put it), by pounding White House spokesman Scott McClellan on the 20-plus hour delay in making the news public. . .

What's so striking, I think, is how a story like this becomes an instant Rorschach test, with political predispositions substituting for inkblots. We know the meaning of this incident because we know how we feel about the vice president, or the administration, or the war in Iraq, or the press -- and therefore, we know how to judge the event.

The exact same thing happened after Katrina. Among diehards on each side, conclusions come first and as the facts come out they are embraced or discarded based on whether or not they support those conclusions. What I find disheartening is that otherwise very smart people are not immune from this phenomenon.

Posted by Todd Pearson at February 15, 2006 12:23 AM
Comments

That's really true, especially with regards to Katrina. In this Cheney story, Administration critics see a cover-up, failure to take responsibility, anti-press hostility, and missed tragets, along with a bunch of tinfoil conspiracies thrown in for good measure. The pro-Bush crew sees this as the "anti-Bush" press run amok, Bush-bashing, culture war conflict ("blue state types don't know about hunting"), and all that.

With Katrina, Bush critics saw incompetence, cronyism, racism, and all that. Conservatives saw the failure of big government, Bush-bashing, and a anti-Bush press.

Oh yeah, and the conspiracies.

My take: The Cheney story is a seemingly minor story made worse by the way everything was handled, not to mention the fact that Whittington's health has worsened. Katrina was a mass tragedy, with incompetence on all levels, from Bush, all the way down.

Posted by: Rafique Tucker at February 15, 2006 01:59 AM

I guess it's an indication of my personality, that the first thing I did was start writing jokes.
A joke by its very nature tends to exaggerate and parody a situation or person.
So if you're talking about Clinton's cigar collection or Cheney's shoot first attitude, it's going to come off as partisan to a partisan, while the centrist will laugh at both.

Posted by: Bob J Young at February 15, 2006 10:25 AM

Bob, Republicans are mostly laughing at the Cheney jokes, too... at least until the seriousness of Mr. Whittington's medical condition became apparent. It's the part about how seriously the media take the delay in telling them that we Republicans find really bizarre.

Posted by: PatHMV at February 15, 2006 11:54 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Declare Your Independence - Unity08.com

Archives


Recent Entries

August 2010
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661