|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 27, 2006Iran and the bomb (version 2.0)
There is are two more posts up at the armscontrolwonk.com on Iran's missile capabilities and destroying their reactors. But I thought I'd talk a bit more about making the bomb. I've been thinking about the possibility that Iran might acquire nuclear weapons by means other than a home grow enrichment effort. There are several possibilities, acquire spent fuel rods, acquire refined material (U-235 or plutonium) or acquire a finished warhead. I use the word “acquire” because there are several possible ways of getting what they need. A gift could be presented to them, they could steal what they need, or they could purchase it. During a convention I attended last year, a lecturer talked about efforts to stop black market trade in nuclear material. (The convention was about industrial health and safety, but homeland security is all the rage.) He had maps and graphs and databases (can't seem to remember what agency he was from). He also had a confession. There are so many sting operations going on in Eurasia that they keep bumping into each other. I left pretty confident that a successful criminal sale of fissile material was really unlikely. But lets assume that you acquired a warhead. If it was a soviet era nuke, then its been lying around for a couple of decades. If you parked your car twenty years ago would you expect it to work today? At the very least the battery would be dead. I know that if I was designing a nuclear weapon I would use a special proprietary battery. One with characteristics not easily duplicated. I would then design the electronics to disable the device if any other battery was used. For that matter, if a criminal sold you a bomb how do you test if the arming codes are correct? Also what's the shelf life of the special version of plastic explosives used for A-bombs. If this is a soviet era nuke (an empire never know for quality) its been bounced from country to country in all sorts of conditions for a long time. Are you going to risk war with the USA on a device of questionable quality and reliability? On the other hand that still leaves buying material or a gift from a friendly power. Either solution would work, since Libya revealed the existence of Chinese A-bomb plans floating round the black market. Such plans make creating a bomb easier, but not easy. After all I can buy plans on how to build a car, but that doesn't mean I can get it to run. And in this case “starting the car” means detonating plastic explosives. However, this shouldn't be beyond the capabilities of a nation. Still leaves a big question about whether your prototype will work. A screwup means you only caused as much damage as dirty bomb (which ain't a heck of a lot of damage). You also loose all that hard to acquire fissile material. Another problem is finding a seller. Would you want to sell your crazy neighbor a gun? Thats quite a liability to incur. I can't see a nuclear powers letting someone else just buy their way into the club. Now as a political ploy we know its already been done. China gave Pakistan the bomb, but I bet they regret it about know. And either Pakistan or North Korea sold Uranium hexafluoride to Libya. Pakistan also was/is supposedly talking to Saudi Arabia about letting the Saudis under their nuclear umbrella. But neither Pakistani or North Korean regimes are just going to sell/give Iran bomb grade material or a warhead. The North Koreans are monsters, but so far, not suicidal monsters. They've spit in our eye, called us names and sold missiles, but they haven't reached for their gun. While the Pakistani's are our reluctant “allies” in the WOT. If I had to put money on the best short term chance for Iran to joint the nuclear club it would be political upheaval in North Korea or Pakistan. When vicious regimes, staffed by greedy evil people collapse, every thing in the country is for sale. The soviet union and Iraq pretty much showed that.
Comments
Totally off subject, or maybe not, but since I can't start, and don't want to start, my own thread, here goes; I read recently, wish I could recall where, that the greater threat Iran represents to the US is economic. As I understand it, currently both Oil exchanges, New York and London, deal exclusively in US dollars, which has prompted much of the world to keep their money reserves likewise in dollars. Apparently, Iran is attempting to form their own Oil Exchange, and deal exclusively in Euros, which could potentially destabalize the dollar, if other nations follow suit, or if the rest of the middle east signs on to Iran's exchange. As evidence, the writer pointed to Saddam's switching from dollars to euros in 2000 for all oil purchases. Did that switch have some effect on the recession the country started? Needless to say, after the invasion, all purchases of Iraqi oil went back to dollars. Now a legitimate argument could be made that the region of the world that has the most petroleum should dictate the exchange. However, the Middle east is anything but stable, and it isn't in America's, or the West's best interest to have Iran possibly destabilize our economy. That would be quite the domino effect. But it does make me wonder if the greater, and more subtler, threat of Iran is economic. Posted by: StantheMan at January 27, 2006 07:09 PMStan: check out this thread But I've been looking at the export data from Iraq, Iran, Venezuela and Saudi. |
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|