|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 22, 2006Post-Game Open ThreadTo those who said that the MVP can't run in the playoffs, to those who said Matt Hasselbeck will choke, to those who said that John Fox is a better coach than Mike Holmgren, to those who said Steve Smith cannot be defended, to those who said Nick Goings was going to run all over the Seahawks defense, to those who said the schedule was inflated and the Hawks were the luckiest team in football, to Skip Bayless, to ESPN and SI who didn't recognize that we play football west of the Cascades until they were forced to.... You are all just, well, freaking super! A team that loves to run against a defense that has been stellar at stopping it, two young quarterbacks who were supposed to amount to nothing, one of the best offenses in the NFL versus one of the best defenses, a team with a deep history and one with no history at all, west coast versus east coast... For a Superbowl? Not bad, not bad at all. The steel curtain I FEAR NOT! See you in Detroit, baby! Posted by Starbucks Republican at January 22, 2006 10:06 PMComments
Congratulation, Mathew! I'm cheering for the Seahawks. Should be a good one. Steelers looked great against the Broncos, forcing all the errors, and Seattle walked over the Panthers. Posted by: Tully at January 22, 2006 11:07 PMBoy, after yesterday, I'm simply in awe of the Steeler D. They stopped two pretty amazing Os. Posted by: Jon Kay at January 23, 2006 09:29 AMThis looks like a great match-up and a really tough game to call. If we're going with the east-coast-versus-west-coast thing, then GO STEELERS! I was going to root for the Steelers anyway, and I don't really consider western PA to be the east coast. They have more in common with the midwest out there. Whatever. Go Steelers. Posted by: WHQ at January 23, 2006 09:39 AMThe steel wall shall come crashing down. Posted by: AR at January 23, 2006 11:05 AMThe best teams won. It's going to be hard to have a preference for the Super Bowl, but it should be a real good game. And the officiating was lots better than last weekend. But one question: when did 7 men on the line of scrimmage become the _maximum_ as well as the minimum? (Or was that foul because the tight end did not report as INeligible?) Well, at least it didn't matter for the outcome of the game. Posted by: wj at January 23, 2006 12:53 PMAre you talking about the penalty on Pittsburgh on what what have been Bettis' second TD run? I don't know why it's illegal, but if the TE is not on the line of scrimage, the WR can't "cover" him by being on the line outside the TE. I don't have a good understanding of the reasons for most illegal formation penalties, but I do know that's what the penalty was for. Posted by: WHQ at January 23, 2006 01:19 PMYeah, I've never taken the time to understand illegal formations on offense either. It's all greek to me. I'm glad that the penalty didn't affect the outcome though, since it's hard to argue that the illegal formation affected the outcome of that play in any meaningful way. Anyone else wondering now whether the "Cowher as a stubborn cementheaded run first guy" theme deserves revisiting in the wake of how the Steelers beat the Colts and Broncos? Maybe he just never had the qb whose hands he was comfortable putting the game's outcome in...or maybe the Steelers offensive coordinator successful made the case that attacking offensively was the way to go. But Bravo to them for making it happen, whoever deserves the credit besides Big Ben. Posted by: bk at January 23, 2006 03:10 PM |
Archives
March 2007
February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Some Smart Surging
Democratic Disgrace Obama: Tastes Great or Less Filling Should United States Attorneys be Professionalized? Don't you dare change your mind! Erin Go Open Thread NCAA tournament thread Blog that Brouhaha to death, AMIIGAF! Why Communism Grew Big: WWI Mythology Part 1 of 3 (LONG) The Right Immigration Questions
|