|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
November 15, 2005Good news from the Middle EastIn the column of good news from the Middle East comes this report from Isreal and Palestine. For the first time, the Palestinian government has been given authority over an international border, with Egypt in the Gaza Strip. The deal was brokered by Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, who delayed a trip to South Korea to use her personal influence to push both sides into agreement. The key to the agreement was Isreal's acceptance of E.U. monitors in the area to make sure both sides live up to the agreement. The monitors will not have weapons or enforcement authority, but will generally only be allowed to report on what they observe. However, they do have the authority to require Palestinian customs officials to reexamine or reassess individual border crossers. This is an extraordinary development. Isreal never cedes any control over its own security needs to outside parties. If Prime Minister Abbas is able to use this success to gain more power at the expense of Hamas, and if the Palestinians take their new responsibilities seriously, this will bode very well for the future. Perhaps the anti-terrorism backlash growing in Jordan will spread to the Palestinians and a real peace process can begin. Posted by PatHMV at November 15, 2005 05:00 PMComments
Good news? This is yet another dangerous capitulation by Israel and no doubt Gaza will be a terrorist haven. Obviously Israel is the sacrificial lamb to boost the sagging fortunes of the Bush administration. No doubt Condi came down hard to force Israel into this absurd agreement. Posted by: Laura at November 16, 2005 12:31 PMBut Laura, if Gaza becomes a terrorist haven, or even shows signs, we all know that Israel has both the power and the will to go right back in and re-assert authority. I have ZERO doubt about that. To me, the notion that anyone in the Bush administration would or even could With this development, the onus is currently on Abbas et al to show that they can autonomously conduct their affairs responsibly. Might they fail this test? Absolutely. If so, it'll be their bad. Posted by: bk at November 16, 2005 01:30 PMIt may very well be a dangerous capitulation, but if Israel doesn't take some risks, there will never be peace (maybe there won't anyway). I know it's easy for me to say living in the US, but I can't see the point of going on this way for generations. Israel's current policy is doing nothing to reduce terrorism and waiting for the Palestinean Authority to become the European Union is pointless. I am waiting for people that oppose any Israeli concessions to come up with some alternative. All I can see of continuing the way they are is generations of more violence. It's got nothing to do with who is to blame; it's a question of whether you try to change things or simply continue along a path that shows no sign of improving. Posted by: Marc at November 16, 2005 05:16 PMGotta walk before they can run. If they want autonomy, the Palestinians have to show they're not going to use it to continue the intifada. And yes, Israel has to give some if they expect to make progress. Tit-for-tat just leads to more of same. They've had decades of that. Posted by: Tully at November 16, 2005 06:48 PMIsrael has already given some, they have relinquished Gaza. In my view there should be no more Israeli concessions until the palestinians renounce and fight terror and renounce and end the incitement going on in their schools, mosques, media etc. I still hold to the view that this agreement regarding Gaza is a very dangerous capitulation on the part of Israel. They will have no way of knowing how many arms or terrorists will flow into Gaza until it is too late. Will a missile strike on a passenger plane going to or from Ben Gurion airport convince the fools in Europe or the U.S. government the folly of this absurd arrangement? Posted by: Laura at November 17, 2005 02:04 PMWill a missile strike on a passenger plane going to or from Ben Gurion airport convince the fools in Europe or the U.S. government the folly of this absurd arrangement? One might just as well ask how long of an absence of such events would convince critics of the policy's wisdom. Posted by: bk at November 17, 2005 03:22 PMWaiting for the Palestineans to renounce violence is like waiting for Godot. It's never going to happen any more than the IRA was going to renounce violence before there was an agreement. Abbas is in no position to disarm the militants. He is simply too weak. That's simply a fact of life. But if Israel makes no movement, Abbas's position is only going to get worse and so will Israel's. There's already increasing talk on the left about a so-called bi-national state that would eliminate Israel entirely. It seems to me that it's in Israel's interest to get a Palestinean state running. I don't mean to minimize the danger involved. It's almost a certainty that Hamas will never accept anything less than all of "Palestine." And I'm skeptical about the idea that Abbas can coopt Hamas. But the current situation promises nothing but more violence. And, frankly, at some point American support for Israel is going to wane if it is seen as being recalcitrant. Posted by: Marc at November 17, 2005 04:26 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|