A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

November 15, 2005

Act ll, Scene 2

In the opening act of Justice and Politics, American Style, the President approaches a close friend of known loyalty, somewhat questionable legal esteem, and ideology undocumented beyond a strong Christian faith. He tosses this friend to the Lions. Unsurprisingly, they devour her.

In the first scene of Act ll, he presents for approval the begged-for hero, Alito. In Act ll, scene 2, the plot thickens:


The scene opens with revelations of the overt ideology of Alito.


In the memo, he writes, "I am and always have been a conservative and an adherent to the same philosophical views that I believe are central to this administration." (Read an excerpt from the document)

Later he writes about his accomplishments, "I am particularly proud of my contributions in recent cases in which the government has argued in the Supreme Court that racial and ethnic quotas should not be allowed and that the Constitution does not protect a right to abortion."

He notes that as a federal employee, "I have been unable to take a role in partisan politics. However, I am a lifelong registered Republican."

I dunno about you, but I'm glued to my seat. Glued, I say!

Posted by Brian Keegan at November 15, 2005 09:52 AM
Comments

"I dunno about you, but I'm glued to my seat. Glued, I say!"

Why? Are you delusional enough to say that Ginsberg wasn't a 'life long Democrat'? That she isn't Liberal? That a conservative president would elect a conservative judge?

What exactly has you surprised?

Posted by: debsay at November 15, 2005 10:30 AM

I didn't say I was surprised. It's a comment about the increased likelihood of a battle royale. I wonder if tradesports has been giving odds on Alito's confirmation. If so, I'm guessing they just went down.

And I'm pretty sure that the chances of Alito's confirmation won't rest on anything related to Ginsburg's confirmation (although I'm certain others will join you in implying that it should.)

IMO, the chances of Alito's confirmation may well rest on the general public's comfort with how Alito is likely to effect abortion jurisprudence. Many have argued that Alito has the same right as other nominees to simply demur when asked pointed questions such as "if roe v. wade is challenged in a scotus case, will you uphold it or overturn it?"

Traditionally, judges have demurred upon the rationale that the possibility that they might be called upon to rule in such a case is precisely the reason why they MUST demur. And I'd say that's reasonably debatable.

However, I know that on the basis of stable public opinion polls over time that #1, about 60-65 percent of the people DON'T want Roe overturned, and #2 that a similar majority thinks that direct questions such as the one I mentioned above SHOULD be answered forthrightly, because the people have a right to know.

So my comment that I'm glued to my seats simply points out that this memo makes things very, very interesting, because it's positive proof that Alito indeed ascribes to the views that his opponents claimed he had, and which some of his supporters have said we couldn't be sure about and didn't matter. This memo, coupled with repeated demurrals from Alito on the matter, may well provide ample cover for moderate Republicans who support abortion rights to vote not to confirm Alito.

And you can argue the shoulds all you want. I'm talking about the real political battle, and how this info may affect how the battle unfolds.

Posted by: bk at November 15, 2005 10:56 AM

BK,

Simple question, how many moderate republicans do you expect WANT to vote against Alito? My guess is few to none.

Even if protecting Roe vs Wade is a paramount issue for them (and I'm not sure it is), despite the fact they are elected officials they can still do basic math. Alito + Scalia + Thomas + Roberts (big ASSUMPTION there) still add upto only 4, which is still less then half of 9.

Do you really think Kennedy is going to be the one to go on record as overturning Roe vs Wade? Or that there is any doubt as to the votes of the other 4?

Congresscritters will avoid doing something that has personal consequences to them if at all possible. Voting against Alito, will have those consequences within thier own party.... it also won't change the vote total for upholding Roe vs Wade..... what it IS likely to do is change the outcome for some cases that involve SOME restrictions but not an outright ban (i.e. parental notification, partial birth abortions). Know what the poll numbers are on those?

Posted by: cengel at November 15, 2005 11:31 AM

Isn't there some football team or hockey team or basketball team that we can root for instead.

Posted by: c3 at November 15, 2005 03:19 PM

I just don't think abortion stirs up the soldiers as it has in years past. Yes, there are still rabid bands on each side of the issue, but does the greater public even really pay much attention to this?

The overwhelming majority of Americans will never have to personally deal with abortion-related decisions, so it will be quite difficult to convince them that one man is going to strip them of a right that really has no direct impact on them.

Do I think the special interest groups on both sides will go nuts? Absolutely. But, I doubt we'll see million woman marches to stop this nomination.

Posted by: AR at November 15, 2005 03:56 PM

Cengel, I'm not claiming the die is cast here, just saying that this particular additional data point changes the prognostications.

I really have no clue how eager the mass of moderate republicans is either way. My guess, and that's all it is, is that there have to be a handful of them who'd love to deny bringing home the bacon for the socially conservative right if they can find political cover. But I don't have a headcount.

Posted by: bk at November 15, 2005 03:56 PM

Indeed. I've been predicting/cautiously anticipating this battle for a while now. If this drama proceeds as it appears to be now, the final act will filled with scenes of political warfare the like of which we've never seen before.

Posted by: Rafique Tucker at November 17, 2005 04:34 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661