|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 27, 2005SCOTUS, Act IIDon't throw away your popcorn, folks! With Miers down, we get to begin the pointless speculation and tea-leaf reading all over again! So dust off those oldies-but-goodies, bring out the lists, shake the tea around the cup once more, and welcome the next act..... For a quick example of how Bush could now come clear out of left (right?) field with the next nomination by way of saying "Screw you!" to absolutely everyone, I say let's give this guy a look. Posted by Tully at October 27, 2005 06:27 PMComments
I love it! Why not Fred Thompson? Hey, he was the prosecutor on Law and Order for a while... That qualifies him, right? I am betting on a John Roberts like nominee... Posssibly Michael McConnell who would probably win bi-partisan support, but none the less edge the court to the right. How can the Democrats vote down someone that agreed with them on Bush v. Gore, or the Clinton impeachment? Posted by: Mathew at October 27, 2005 06:49 PMTully, I see your Fred Thompson and raise you a Lindsay Graham. (I mean, if we're going for GOP-Senate-friendly white guys, pick the one with the gender-ambiguous name.) Plus the GOP governor gets to appoint the replacement. But for those looking for a female John Roberts, there are rumors now about Maureen Mahoney, a partner at Latham & Watkins. The comparisons in CV are noteworthy. Posted by: The Jaded JD at October 27, 2005 07:42 PMThompson has a lot more real-life legal experience than Graham, though I like Graham too. Just not for the USSC.... Of course almost all of Thompson's experience has been in government, which is a minus when tea-leaf reading time comes around. He actually had to promote the opinions and interpretations he was tasked to promote. But I suspect that Thompson is going to run for governor himself. And if he does, he'll win. Posted by: Tully at October 27, 2005 08:20 PMThat's an amusing idea. Almost as funny as John Stewart's attack ad on Geena Davis for wanting to be the TV President. I agree that Thompson has the right demeanor to win a goverorship. Which state? Like it or not, he polished his image substantially with the role he played on Law and Order... Posted by: bk at October 28, 2005 09:16 AMTennessee, of course. He'd win in a walk, and speculation is rife that he plans exactly that. There is no one on the GOP side that incumbent Phil Bredesen fears more as an opponent. I'm just throwing his name out as a SCOTUS nomination for giggles, of course, but he's a good example of someone that would be very tough to effectively demonize, and who could handle the hearings very well indeed. He began his public service career as a US attorney, then helped bring down a president as Watergate co-chief counsel, brought down a governor in the Tennessee pardon scandals, etc. He has no time on the bench, but he has plenty of visible and trackable time in the public sector. Posted by: Tully at October 28, 2005 09:58 AMNot to mention he (Thompson) is a very imposing and Presidential figure. There are many who were disappointed when he left the Senate to return to acting, it was widely assumed that he would have made a great Presidential candidate. He'd win the TN governorship without even campaigning. Posted by: AR at October 28, 2005 10:45 AMDammit! I don't know why hyperlinks don't work when I post them here the first time. I swear I know HTML. The link to Ms. Mahoney's bio is here. Incidentally, Tom Goldstein, who predicted the Roberts nomination on November 7, 2004, now predicts Samuel Alito of the Third Circuit gets this one. Tully, You'll just have to take my word for it that an AUSA isn't the same thing as a full-fledged United States Attorney. (Among other things, we have to file stuff in the United States Attorney's name. And he gets the cool office with the riverscape view. And his pay is better.) Posted by: The Jaded JD at October 28, 2005 03:02 PMQuite an impressive resume, but does that really matter to conservatives? They jumped on Miers over a perceived lack of constitutional skills (quite cruelly I might add), something they would obviously be unable to do in this case. However, they only reason they attacked Miers was because they were not convinced she had pledged her allegiance to their cause. What would be different with Ms. Mahoney? (I'm asking...not aware of any of her views.) Posted by: AR at October 28, 2005 04:15 PMToo bad Steven Hill is dead. He'd be an awesome choice! Posted by: Mitch Cumstein at October 28, 2005 07:38 PMPick me! PIck me! I'll save the U.S. from slouching toward Gomorrah! Posted by: Robert Bork at October 29, 2005 10:14 AMAlas, poor Harriet, we knew her not at all... Well, at least she performed one last service for the "most brilliant man" she knows. By throwing herself on that grenade on Thursday, she made her withdrawal a one day story and distracted attention from Libbygate. Quite an accomplishment. If only the WH had done the rest of her confirmation so well... Posted by: Blue Jean at October 29, 2005 10:19 AMJD, I'll absolutely take your word for it. I said I was just throwing it out for giggles...Thompson has palpable personal gravitas, even if it was developed for the Big Screen! I don't want Graham on SCOTUS because he's much more useful where he is, especially if he advances in the party heirarchy. Posted by: Tully at October 29, 2005 12:27 PMI'll support him for the seat, naturally, but only if he promises every opinion he writes will include: "This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it." The AUSA/USA thing was in jest, because he was only an Assistant US Attorney not a US Attorney. Posted by: The Jaded JD at October 29, 2005 01:47 PMThe most memorable quote from Thompson that I can recall offhand is: "After two years in Washington, I often long for the realism and sincerity of Hollywood."Posted by: Tully at October 29, 2005 08:21 PM Me, I want to see Thompson do that "They all give milk." speech from Roseanne. Girls! Girls! You'll never believe what he wanted me to do! Posted by: Blue Jean at October 30, 2005 09:10 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|