|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
September 03, 2005Certain TrumpetsThis Pew Survey on religion and partisan politics shows some concerned about the religiousness of the Republican Party and the secularness of the Democratic Party. There is no apparent advantage to either side; just a cleavage. There's also new data on beliefs in evolution, with 42% of repondents creationist, 48% supporting evolution, including 18% who believe evolution is divinely guided. What I find particularly interesting is that creationists were twice as likely as evolutionists to report being "very certain" of their views. Certainty can be comforting. We like our leaders to be certain. Certainly breeds confidence. Why trust a leader who isn't even sure he or she is right?For if the trumpet gave an uncertain sound, who would prepare himself for war? And yet, certainty may actually be a marker for poor data evaluation skills. Certainty may indicate that a person leaps to conclusions, and avoids alternative explanations. And still, there is a role for certainty in leadership. Before a decision is made, multiple options need to be evaluated. But while a decision is being implemented, a steady course must be pursued. Indeed, in many cases, more than one option can succeed, but each option can succeed only if pursued to its conclusion. With regard to the Iraq War, I feel that a surfeit of certainty--e.g. that WMD's were a "slam dunk"--was a major part in the decision, which now seems erroneous in hindsight, to go to war in Iraq. But on the other hand, I feel we must now "stay the course," more or less, to avoid the defeat brought on by an uncertain trumpet. Posted by rickheller at September 3, 2005 10:24 AMComments
Rick; As an aside, interesting that the Pew article put some focus on Intelligent Design. I found this article regarding Richard Sternberg, the guy who got the whole Smithsonian Intelligent Design conference fuss started. Interestinig that he's not a "bible thumper" (as the article points out). No doubt the Religious Right has latched onto Intelligent Design as a back door to creationism (in spite of the "non-Christian" aspects of Intelligent Design). Little doubt that positive discussions of Intelligent Design by non Christians have more to do with the philosphy of science than science itself. From that viewpoint, Intelligent Design should not taught "in constrast" to Evolution but could be a part of a discussion on the philosophical underpinnings of science. Posted by: c3 at September 7, 2005 05:31 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|