|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
July 25, 2005Karl Rove and Wedding CrashersCrossposted on JBFABA Sen. McCain was a guest on This Week with George Stephanopoulos. I knew there'd be some discussion on John Roberts, but I was also hoping to hear more about the legislation he is co-sponsoring Sen. Graham and Sen. Warner that would (in a quote interpolated from ChargingRINO) "...bar the U.S. military from engaging in 'cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment' of detainees, from hiding prisoners from the Red Cross, and from using interrogation methods not authorized by a new Army field manual." Apparently, because Sen. McCain had a seven second cameo where he shook hands with Christopher Walken outside of a church, there's a controversy brewing because he's a U.S. Senator and the movie is, as Drudge Rreport calls it, "a boob raunch fest." McCain's response is, "In Washington, I work with boobs everyday." That's good enough for me, so instead of wasting any of my own sarcasm on this nonsense, I'd rather just move on to Mr. Rove. I'm still not entirely sure what the story is exactly, but here's what I've pieced together. Karl Rove was accused of something bad. Liberals don't like him, so since he was accused of something bad, he's guilty and should be fired (or at least tarred and feathered). Conservatives like him, so it doesn't matter what he was accused of in the first place. They're taking the stick your fingers in your ears and scream "I'm not listening" defense. Somewhere in the middle Time Magazine got a lot of publicity, Newsweek had fun criticizing them, and a New York Times reporter is jailed for not writing anything. I think Jude may have broken up Brad and Angelina too. My point - and I do have one - is this: There aren't nearly enough facts to know exactly what they knew and when they knew it, so people just make it up as they go along. We've become an overly opinionated society where, instead of forming an opinion once all the facts are in, we form our opinion as all the facts come in. For every five minutes of factual information, we get five days of people giving their opinion on it. Yet if anyone ever changes their mind based on new facts that came in, they're accused of not getting their facts straight. In the case of the morning shows, important issues get glossed over so Senators and other government officials can give an answer without giving an answer, while the bloggers (shut up) look for any excuse to jump in and say, "Gotcha!" Is there a story here somewhere? Duh. Releasing classified information is a serious offense, and I don't mean it to sound like something to be taken lightly. But it's a serious offense - that's why there is an investigation under way (with a special prosecutor who apparently knows how to git r' done). When that investigation has concluded and people in the Bush Administration are being charged with something, then bring the comeuppance and let the media circus begin. I'll even bring the feathers. However until then, let's focus on current issues like a war that still isn't going well (and is fixing to get worse come Aug. 15th), terrorist attacks on London, a war of a different kind brewing in the senate over Stem Cell research funding, rising gas prices, extreme interest groups on both sides in need of a serious smackdown, congress over reacting because a democrat wants to buy a major league baseball team, growing concerns in China and Iran, the next time some white chick goes missing... Posted by Brodigan2016 at July 25, 2005 06:40 PMComments
LOL. Second the motion. Posted by: Tully at July 25, 2005 06:48 PMThis was great I'm still not entirely sure what the story is exactly, but here's what I've pieced together. Karl Rove was accused of something bad. Liberals don't like him, so since he was accused of something bad, he's guilty and should be fired (or at least tarred and feathered). Conservatives like him, so it doesn't matter what he was accused of in the first place. They're taking the stick your fingers in your ears and scream "I'm not listening" defense. Somewhere in the middle Time Magazine got a lot of publicity, Newsweek had fun criticizing them, and a New York Times reporter is jailed for not writing anything. I think Jude may have broken up Brad and Angelina too.That's about as far as my grasp on this story goes. Your way was funnier, though. ;) Posted by: Simon at July 25, 2005 07:27 PM Yes, well said. Much needed. Posted by: JBD at July 25, 2005 07:44 PMThis is Washington. Forget logic. While I'm no conservative, it amazed me how liberals, who supposedly advocate open-mindedness, are completely unwilling to give any conservative the benefit of the "innocent until proven guilty" assumption. To some extent, I think liberals have decided that conservatives are rotten bastards, so we'll be rotten bastards too in response. (Or, maybe it's just more fun to jump to conclusions.) Posted by: MWS at July 26, 2005 09:40 AMI saw the movie and yes it was a times a boobfest (literally). But I bet the conservative are more upset that McCain's cameo involved standing in the reception line with James Carville!! Posted by: c3 at July 26, 2005 04:37 PMMust...resist...straight...line.... Posted by: Tully at July 26, 2005 05:35 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|