|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
July 08, 2005Rehnquist Retires?Drudge, Redstate, and Novak are reporting that Chief Justice William Rehnquist has resigned from the Supreme Court, and that a White House press statement is forthcoming. None of the major networks are reporting as far as I know. Erick from Redstate says: As the sun sets over Macon, Georgia, reliable sources are telling me that the Chief Justice of the United States will retire this evening, ending a career on the Supreme Court bench that began in 1972, with an appointment by President Richard Nixon. It is going to be a hot summer! UPDATE: Jeremy (Charging RINO), is doing a bang up job of keeping track of all the speculation... Some of which disputes the above claims. Posted by Mathew at July 8, 2005 05:23 PMComments
I'm not convinced. As a general rule, I assume that anything I read on the blogosphere requires legitimizing confirmation, and anything which Drudge reports is per se false. I mean, it could happen, but with speculation so rampant, it's easy to see that speculation could cross the line into false facts. Let's hold our horses until we have it from a reputable source. Posted by: Simon at July 8, 2005 05:30 PMLike Rehnquist. ;-) Posted by: Tully at July 8, 2005 05:32 PMMore feeding frenzy: Redstaters are beginning to pass the "word" from their own sources that Stevens is also ready to turn in his robe. My sources say "so far, just a rumor." I think we need to start a new Pointless Speculation thread! Posted by: Tully at July 8, 2005 05:48 PMI think there's a very good point made over on CNN's coverage: Meantime, the chief justice continued his public silence. Rehnquist, a widower who lives alone, didn't pause Friday when asked if the retirement speculation was true. "I would bet Rehnquist is thinking it would be demeaning to the office of chief justice to put out a press release saying `I'm not retiring this summer,"' [Supreme Court historian at Emory University David] Garrow said. Posted by: Simon at July 8, 2005 05:57 PMI think Redstate deserves more credit than that, Tully... They scooped the O'Conner retirement and have been pretty close if not completely accurate on other news items. Furthermore, I don't see the harm, nor understand why it is pointless to speculate. Redstate, to my knowledge, did not say that Stevens was retiring, but rather, that he made certain moves in his personal life that could lead one to that conclusion, and furthermore, that his retirement would make political sense because it would more than likely put pressure on the President to appoint at least some moderates. Let's not get confused hear, my defense of Redstate's reporting is in no way a defense of much of the substance on that site which, IMO, amounts to un-original right wing banter. Posted by: Mathew at July 8, 2005 06:02 PMCorrection: Justice O'Connor's retirement was scooped by the Volokh Conspiracy's Orin Kerr. Posted by: Simon at July 8, 2005 06:10 PMSimon, Oh please... I am not sure it can be proven, but if not, they were a close second. Posted by: Mathew at July 8, 2005 06:13 PMWouldn't it be hilarious--even if completely unrealistic--for the Chief to announce tonight that he will have an announcement Monday afternoon, only to announce then that he's not retiring? Oh, the delicious agony of the pundits this weekend. Posted by: The Jaded JD at July 8, 2005 06:30 PMSCOTUSblog notes that the White House has told the press corps to go home. It was just a rumour. I love JJD's idea, though. ;) I stand by my comments of June 28: It seems to me that this term would not be the note on which the Chief would want to leave; as I think Tom mentioned the other day, any number of cases have not gone the way I suspect he'd prefer or would have expected. Tom also noted on the SCOTUS nomination blog that Rehnquist certainly has the facility to carry on for as long as he's physically able, so it becomes a question of will. So I wonder if, even had Rehnquist nursed a desire to leave back in January, it evaporated as cases were decided. ...[Thus] I would be far from surprised - and far from displeased - if he did stay.(Also mentioned here). Posted by: Simon at July 8, 2005 08:09 PM Tom also noted on the SCOTUS nomination blog that Rehnquist certainly has the facility to carry on for as long as he's physically able, so it becomes a question of will. Reading that sentence reminded me of the fictional justice hanging on in his death bed in "The Pelican Brief." It was that one, right? That guy's books are all the same. Posted by: WHQ at July 8, 2005 08:32 PMI've chatted today with my right leaning DC source and my left leaning DC source...neither know a thing about Rhenquist retiring. Both of them are pretty well connected. If he's really retiring..no one knows about it, LOL Posted by: carla at July 8, 2005 09:52 PMSometimes the rumors are more fun than the real thing--and we certainly need some humor this week. Two dumbest WELL, DUH! headlines on DRUDGE tonight: "Supreme Court Speculation Fuels Rumors" "Reid won't rule out filibuster over Supreme Court nominee" Posted by: Tully at July 8, 2005 10:38 PMIt's those bloody obvious DUH! headlines that really crack me up, Carla. Like SKY DARKER AT NIGHT! or RAIN IS WET! I mean, "Speculation Fuels Rumors"?!?! Well, DUH!!!! Posted by: Tully at July 9, 2005 03:38 PMFor what it's worth...my personal opinion...I feel sorry for the man. I do think the endless speculation is way over the top. What's next? "Excuse me sir, our sources tell us that you are likely to pass in the next 24 hours. Do you care to comment?" But then again, some have just about gotten that personal. He'll announce if and when he's damn ready to do it. Until then, just let the guy do his job in peace. Posted by: AR at July 9, 2005 07:52 PMradical democrat centrists like myself will |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|