A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

May 24, 2005

Political Tilt Among The Professoriat

An interesting interview with Stanley Rothman, an expert on political bias in the academy and media. One of Rothman's observations is that there is a natural proclivity for smart conservatives to go into business, and smart liberals to go into teaching. But this split was accentuated more recently:


One piece of evidence is quite clear: during the 1980's and l990's there was a distinct shift to the left in the academy as the rebels of the sixties were tenured. This was not part of a plot of any kind but rather of a natural affinity. However, I am sure that it has discouraged some conservative and centrist intellectuals from seeking an academic career, as have various affirmative action and "diversity" initiatives, to some extent at least.

One thing that tickled me about the interview is that Rothman says that his ideas are not "completely formulated." Rothman started college in 1944, and yet he's still actively thinking and considering ideas in an open-minded fashion. How many young bloggers can say that?

Posted by rickheller at May 24, 2005 09:21 AM
Comments

Glazov:
"Conservatives, on the other hand, tend to believe that love, work, family and culture are the stuff of which life is made. They turn to politics reluctantly and, only as a last resort, to defend themselves. They are also persuaded that civility plays an important role in the preservation of a decent community, and are reluctant to violate the rules of civility."

What blind assertions! What quality of Love exactly? What kind of civility?

Posted by: keebler2012 at May 24, 2005 09:58 AM

Glazov is a conservative, so he's putting his spin down. I do not see greater civility among conservatives. I do think that conservatives are less likely to be career politicians, not because they love their families more but because they put greater value on getting rich in the business world.

Posted by: rickheller at May 24, 2005 10:04 AM

And liberals put greater value on getting rich by being corrupt politicians?

Posted by: ROA at May 24, 2005 10:29 AM

There are different flavors of Conservative. Libertarian style conservatives view generaly view government based solutions to societal problems with a good deal of skepticism so they, most definately would be inclined not to be involved in politics or government unless they fealt themselves under assualt by the same.

Classical Conservatives tend, by definition, to favor the status quo therefore they also would be naturaly less inclined to be involved in politics because they have little desire to change much about society.

Conservatives also tend, by nature, to be more respectfull of traditional society conventions. Therefore they are less likely to violate the same.... thus Glazov's comment about rules of civility. In that sense, I think his comments are supported. Obviously there is alot of room for exceptions.

Posted by: cengel at May 24, 2005 02:10 PM
And liberals put greater value on getting rich by being corrupt politicians?
ROA, c'mon. Is that really necessary? Is that really meant to further a discussion or just pick a fight? Posted by: c3 at May 24, 2005 03:43 PM

It is also sort of generational. Younger conservatives (ie, movement conservatives) are really LESS respectful of convention. They are trying to break up what they see as the liberal status quo.

Posted by: MWS at May 24, 2005 03:53 PM

c3, My comment was in response to Rick’s statement that “conservatives are less likely to be career politicians, not because they love their families more but because they put greater value on getting rich in the business world.” That struck me as being unfair.

Posted by: ROA at May 24, 2005 06:53 PM

ROA;
OK I kinda see your point. I guess I hear that sterotype so often (conservative only interested in making money) I kinda of ignore it. Of course, if a Democrat holds on to that stereotype then they must assume that the poor and working class folks who voted Republican were duped. Didn't we hear that after this past election?

Posted by: c3 at May 24, 2005 07:55 PM

I used to sit in the hall for the hour before one of my Poli Sci classes, reading magazines to kill the time. One day, my professor walks by, sees what I'm reading, and says (in a very snobby tone): "Reader's Digest? That's FAR too conservative for me." It was all I could do not to bust out laughing on the spot.

Fortunately, he was a decent enough guy and didn't work too hard at imposing his views on the class.

Posted by: PatHMV at May 25, 2005 06:25 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661