|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
May 24, 2005Political Tilt Among The ProfessoriatAn interesting interview with Stanley Rothman, an expert on political bias in the academy and media. One of Rothman's observations is that there is a natural proclivity for smart conservatives to go into business, and smart liberals to go into teaching. But this split was accentuated more recently:
One thing that tickled me about the interview is that Rothman says that his ideas are not "completely formulated." Rothman started college in 1944, and yet he's still actively thinking and considering ideas in an open-minded fashion. How many young bloggers can say that? Posted by rickheller at May 24, 2005 09:21 AM Comments
Glazov: What blind assertions! What quality of Love exactly? What kind of civility? Posted by: keebler2012 at May 24, 2005 09:58 AMGlazov is a conservative, so he's putting his spin down. I do not see greater civility among conservatives. I do think that conservatives are less likely to be career politicians, not because they love their families more but because they put greater value on getting rich in the business world. Posted by: rickheller at May 24, 2005 10:04 AMAnd liberals put greater value on getting rich by being corrupt politicians? Posted by: ROA at May 24, 2005 10:29 AMThere are different flavors of Conservative. Libertarian style conservatives view generaly view government based solutions to societal problems with a good deal of skepticism so they, most definately would be inclined not to be involved in politics or government unless they fealt themselves under assualt by the same. Classical Conservatives tend, by definition, to favor the status quo therefore they also would be naturaly less inclined to be involved in politics because they have little desire to change much about society. Conservatives also tend, by nature, to be more respectfull of traditional society conventions. Therefore they are less likely to violate the same.... thus Glazov's comment about rules of civility. In that sense, I think his comments are supported. Obviously there is alot of room for exceptions. Posted by: cengel at May 24, 2005 02:10 PMAnd liberals put greater value on getting rich by being corrupt politicians?ROA, c'mon. Is that really necessary? Is that really meant to further a discussion or just pick a fight? Posted by: c3 at May 24, 2005 03:43 PM It is also sort of generational. Younger conservatives (ie, movement conservatives) are really LESS respectful of convention. They are trying to break up what they see as the liberal status quo. c3, My comment was in response to Rick’s statement that “conservatives are less likely to be career politicians, not because they love their families more but because they put greater value on getting rich in the business world.” That struck me as being unfair. Posted by: ROA at May 24, 2005 06:53 PMROA; I used to sit in the hall for the hour before one of my Poli Sci classes, reading magazines to kill the time. One day, my professor walks by, sees what I'm reading, and says (in a very snobby tone): "Reader's Digest? That's FAR too conservative for me." It was all I could do not to bust out laughing on the spot. Fortunately, he was a decent enough guy and didn't work too hard at imposing his views on the class. Posted by: PatHMV at May 25, 2005 06:25 PMMortgage Quotes | |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|