|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
April 22, 2005Open ThreadWhat's on your mind? Nothing is off topic Posted by rickheller at April 22, 2005 02:13 PMComments
To start off. I just finished Left Behind, the first book of the Tim LaHaye/Jerry Jenkins series about Earth after the Rapture. It's pretty entertaining, if you treat it as science fiction/fantasy, and don't worry about theological reality. Today's column in the Washington Post by Robert Samuelson. He takes to task the Brookings "nonreport" on what to do about the future effects of entitlement programs on the federal budget. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7921-2005Apr21.html?referrer=email Posted by: tim at April 22, 2005 02:21 PMAfter watching Bolton on C-Span I don't like him. We have a big job to do at the U.N. and I wouldn't pick him for the job. But if President Bush assured me that he really wanted him and that his nomination was not made for some other reason (such as smoking out those who are not with him) then I would vote to send his name out to the full Senate over much stronger objections than Biden, et al have brought up. Therefore, I think Bolton is a stalking horse. Statements by Powell, Chafee, Voinovich et al will, from this point on, be considered in a different context than before these hearings. Bush may just prolong this to see who else abandons ship. Before a battle it is a good idea to find out who is going to buckle when the going gets tough. Yes, yes, I know: Courage to speak up. How about the courage to declare and run for office as an independent, if that, indeed, is what one is? Posted by: Notherbob2 at April 22, 2005 04:15 PMRick, I agree, but read book two... It falls apart after LaHaye and Jenkins started pumping out books as fast as they could in order to make a profit. Posted by: Mathew at April 22, 2005 04:22 PM"How about the courage to declare and run for office as an independent, if that, indeed, is what one is?" Well, that is the problem. The two parties have done a pretty good job of writing the laws at the state and federal level to insure against the rise of a viable 3rd party or a bunch of independents capable of winning election without party support. So what's a poor senator to do? Sometimes one has to take a stand. I think the republic will survive. Posted by: tim at April 22, 2005 05:04 PMThe Profesora got tenure on Wednesday. We're pretty happy.... Jon Congrats to the Profesora, Jon! Posted by: Tully at April 23, 2005 01:16 PMThird parties can indeed make a difference--just ask Bush the First and Al Gore. Winning elections isn't the same thing as affecting elections. Posted by: Tully at April 23, 2005 01:17 PMI'm not sure if anybody else saw this, but Ezra Klein had a series of posts last week on the health care system in 5 countries (France, England, Canada, Germany and Japan). Nice overview, but I'd be interested in seeing a more thorough discussion from both sides of the aisle. Something I may go into depth later if more time. The premise of the new bankruptcy law versus what the Bush admin just did to screw United Airline employees out of big chunks of their pensions. The double standard for those that have money and power marches on.
Yes, third parties make a difference, but my reference was to actually getting elected. That doesn't happen much. Posted by: tim at April 25, 2005 03:35 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|