A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

April 21, 2005

Unfunded Mandate

Listened to the NPR story on the lawsuit by several school districts against the Department of Education regarding "No Child Left Behind". I heard that magical phrase "Unfunded Mandate". So what qualifies as an unfunded mandate? Wikipedia defines it as

statute that requires government or private parties to carry out specific actions, but does not appropriate any funds for that purpose.
As examples it cites "No Child Left Behind", "ADA" and my personal (and professional) favorite the "Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA)".

So if the feds feel access to public spaces regardless of physical ability or access to emergency care regardless of ability to pay or access to measurably high quality education regardless of where you live is a good thing, what's the obligation of the feds to fund that conviction. Interesting that Wikipedia also cites the provisions in the United States Constitution that provide for direct election of Representatives, Senators, and the President as another example of an "unfunded mandate".

Posted by c3 at April 21, 2005 12:08 AM
Comments

I have a hard time regarding Wikipedia content as authoritative. I suppose a comparison between, for example, print media and blogs can be applied to real encyclopaedias and Wikipedia. But, while I value blogs as a medium for broader discussion, I don't consider blogs a source for authoritative information. Just because one person who edited the Wikipedia entry you cite had the ironic sense of humor to refer to direct elections of federal officials as an unfunded mandate doesn't necessarily mean that such a reference is ideologically accurate. When one makes one's own definition of a phrase, it's easy to include or exclude whatever one chooses, and for whatever purpose. Perhaps the advantage of Wikipedia is that if someone doesn't like the definition, one can change it. I remain unpersuaded.

Posted by: The Jaded JD at April 21, 2005 09:06 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661