|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
April 07, 2005Not Fake!Despite an attempt by Powerline to repeat its Rathergate glory, it turns out the Schiavo memo was not a fake
Writes Michelle Malkin
I don't believe Centerfield has ever posted on this side issue. But it's a good lesson about not jumping to conclusions, and how the word "allegedly" is a useful term to keep distance from charges which may not be accurate. Update: Joe Gandelman has a roundup on this, and some advice from a veteran journalist. Posted by rickheller at April 7, 2005 11:01 AMComments
Good post! Posted by: Daniel at April 7, 2005 11:23 AMOkay, it's confession time...lol. I will confess to e-mailing Raw Story (who has kept this story going) about two weeks ago after following their links that compared the memo with a Martinez press release. Call it gut instinct, but I knew Mel Martinez's office had written this memo. His staff has a history of doing particularly under-handed nasty things, and he later claiming complete ignorance. During the primary, his staff sent out a last-minute mailing that called his (extremely) conservative primary opponent a tool of the "radical homosexual agenda." They held conference calls and ripped the man (Bill McCollum) to shreds. Martinez, in keeping with his innocent demeanor, claimed no knowlege. Because that staff stayed on, I knew it was a matter of time before they struck again. Now Martinez's staff is exposed for targeting a man (Bill Nelson) who has been a good friend of Martinez's for years--in fact, they live in the same Orlando neighborhood and have campaigned for each other in the past. What does this say about Martinez? He's not the brightest tool in the shed if he's passing off memos like this. I have a friend who refers to him as the "male Paula Hawkins." (For those not from Florida, she was a one-term Senator swept in during the Reagan Revolution. She was somewhat of a ditz--something the voters figured out pretty quickly.) Martinez could very well be a one-termer. For one thing, they certainly won't be sharing secret strategy with someone who can't even hold onto a memo...lol! Posted by: AH at April 7, 2005 11:38 AMThe Washington Times, a conservative Bush mouthpiece here, had a headline the other day suggesting the memo was a fake. I wonder if it will be issuing a retraction. Posted by: MWS at April 7, 2005 12:13 PMRead the article in the paper today. Got to hand it to Mr Martinez, he was asked for "talking points" by Tom Harkin and he got "talking points". Clearly there's been a lot of "talking" since then. Posted by: c3 at April 7, 2005 12:19 PMThere was a reason I didn't blog this earlier...mainly, that judging from the text, it was obviously written by an idiot. To boot, it had to have been passed on by an idiot. There was NO evidence as to origin, so deciding which particular idiots were involved was a fool's game without some evidence. Now we know which idiots. Martinez is claiming ignorance, that he passed it on not knowing what it was, thinking it was something else. I guess he figures being caught at being ignorant is marginally better than being caught at being stupid. Posted by: Tully at April 7, 2005 01:58 PMI guess he figures being caught at being ignorant is marginally better than being caught at being stupid.Which one is the "thoughful" conservative? Posted by: c3 at April 7, 2005 07:55 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|