A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

April 07, 2005

Not Fake!

Despite an attempt by Powerline to repeat its Rathergate glory, it turns out the Schiavo memo was not a fake


The legal counsel to Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) admitted yesterday that he was the author of a memo citing the political advantage to Republicans of intervening in the case of Terri Schiavo, the senator said in an interview last night.

Brian H. Darling, 39, a former lobbyist for the Alexander Strategy Group on gun rights and other issues, offered his resignation and it was immediately accepted, Martinez said.


Writes Michelle Malkin

After John Hinderaker at Power Line first started asking necessary questions about the reporting on the memo, many on the Right jumped to conclusions that the memo was "fake" or a "dirty trick." I concur that those who made such claims should issue clear retractions and corrections. And I urge those bloggers and pundits to do so.

I don't believe Centerfield has ever posted on this side issue. But it's a good lesson about not jumping to conclusions, and how the word "allegedly" is a useful term to keep distance from charges which may not be accurate.

Update: Joe Gandelman has a roundup on this, and some advice from a veteran journalist.

Posted by rickheller at April 7, 2005 11:01 AM
Comments

Good post!

Posted by: Daniel at April 7, 2005 11:23 AM

Okay, it's confession time...lol. I will confess to e-mailing Raw Story (who has kept this story going) about two weeks ago after following their links that compared the memo with a Martinez press release. Call it gut instinct, but I knew Mel Martinez's office had written this memo. His staff has a history of doing particularly under-handed nasty things, and he later claiming complete ignorance.

During the primary, his staff sent out a last-minute mailing that called his (extremely) conservative primary opponent a tool of the "radical homosexual agenda." They held conference calls and ripped the man (Bill McCollum) to shreds. Martinez, in keeping with his innocent demeanor, claimed no knowlege.

Because that staff stayed on, I knew it was a matter of time before they struck again. Now Martinez's staff is exposed for targeting a man (Bill Nelson) who has been a good friend of Martinez's for years--in fact, they live in the same Orlando neighborhood and have campaigned for each other in the past.

What does this say about Martinez? He's not the brightest tool in the shed if he's passing off memos like this. I have a friend who refers to him as the "male Paula Hawkins." (For those not from Florida, she was a one-term Senator swept in during the Reagan Revolution. She was somewhat of a ditz--something the voters figured out pretty quickly.) Martinez could very well be a one-termer. For one thing, they certainly won't be sharing secret strategy with someone who can't even hold onto a memo...lol!

Posted by: AH at April 7, 2005 11:38 AM

The Washington Times, a conservative Bush mouthpiece here, had a headline the other day suggesting the memo was a fake. I wonder if it will be issuing a retraction.

Posted by: MWS at April 7, 2005 12:13 PM

Read the article in the paper today. Got to hand it to Mr Martinez, he was asked for "talking points" by Tom Harkin and he got "talking points". Clearly there's been a lot of "talking" since then.

Posted by: c3 at April 7, 2005 12:19 PM

There was a reason I didn't blog this earlier...mainly, that judging from the text, it was obviously written by an idiot. To boot, it had to have been passed on by an idiot. There was NO evidence as to origin, so deciding which particular idiots were involved was a fool's game without some evidence.

Now we know which idiots. Martinez is claiming ignorance, that he passed it on not knowing what it was, thinking it was something else. I guess he figures being caught at being ignorant is marginally better than being caught at being stupid.

Posted by: Tully at April 7, 2005 01:58 PM
I guess he figures being caught at being ignorant is marginally better than being caught at being stupid.
Which one is the "thoughful" conservative? Posted by: c3 at April 7, 2005 07:55 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661