A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

March 24, 2005

Bankruptcy - What About Medical Relief?

If Congress can pass a private relief bill for the family of Terri Schiavo, why can't they pass a bill that would provide funding for medical relief to families or individuals who have been forced into bankruptcy? Instead of forcing hospitals and care providers to write-off unpaid bills, or struggling families to labor to repay them, why can't we have a limited form of national health insurance that would rescue families from financial catastrophe due to medical emergencies? This might alleviate the more egregious isses with the bankruptcy bill.

Posted by rickheller at March 24, 2005 11:11 AM
Comments

why can't we have a limited form of national health insurance that would rescue families from financial catastrophe due to medical emergencies?

This might give the people doing the billing even more incentive to pile on the costs.

I sympathize with the notion that "everyone" ends up paying those unpaid bills. But part of the underlying problem of runaway healthcare costs is middleman costs, bureaucracy costs, marketing costs, and so on.

In the current fiscal climate of a big current deficit and looming cost growth in both SS and medicaid/care, I can't see another new program to have the government step into the breech and foot the bill.

I think it makes sense to deal with credit issuing policies along with bankruptcy rules. If it isn't dealth with as part of the overall discussion of credit-driven problems, it won't be addressed at all, becuase the constituency is small enough and powerless enough to be ignored.

I think the medically-criven bankruptcy issue should be dealth with as part of healthcare reform, which is probably going to be a big issue post 2008.

Posted by: bk at March 24, 2005 11:29 AM

The Kerry campaign floated the "catastrophic cost" pick-up during the campaign. Sounds good in theory, but as Brian points out there's a major agency factor. Once the ceiling is reached and everything is covered, providers have an incentive to provide unlimited care. And once the patient hits the out-of-pocket ceiling and all is covered, they DEMAND unlimited care.

The dilemma--the way to restrain costs is either through provider-driven rationing or patient-driven self-rationing. The patient has no incentive to self-ration if they don't pay the bill. The provider has no incentive to ration if the bill is always paid. With our third-party payor system, we've laid off much of the rationing function to the 3rd party payors.

If the provider rations, call in the lawyers. If the patient self-rations, call in the undertakers. If a 3rd party rations, call in the politicians....and the lawyers and the undertakers.

Who said life was easy?

Posted by: Tully at March 24, 2005 12:45 PM

I understand the sentiment. The implementation would be complex and in short A DISASTER. Lets keep bankuptcy reform separate form Healthcare reform. Lets not give anyone an "easy way out" of healthcare reform. You have to eat your spinach!

Posted by: c3 at March 24, 2005 01:56 PM

Hell, about a some student debt relief for my broke ass?

Posted by: S at March 27, 2005 03:22 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661