|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
March 15, 2005Could the House Implode?E. J. Dionne Jr has an interesting editorial in today's Washington Post that explores the delicate tight rope that the GOP walks in keeping its evangelical and business factions working in harmony. Much of the article centers on the ethics problems of Tom DeLay, but DeLay isn't really the story, he's merely the front. Without getting into the possibillity of an indictment against DeLay (after all, this is the same prosecuter that tried Kay Bailey Hutchinson for assault), the GOP's uniformity in the House has the potential of imploding. DeLay has deep connections to Jack Abramoff, a lobbyist tied to Indiam gambling interests. Dionne talks about a recent article by Post reporter Susan Schmidt that discusses some of the tricks Abramoff used to push his agenda. When a Lousiana tribe found it's exclusive gambling rights challenged by another tribe, they hired Abramoff. Abramoff paid $4 million to Ralph Reed, who worked in co-horts with James Dobson to preach against the evils of gambling. Certainly Reed must have realized that gambling money was paying him to fight gambling. While Dobson may not have known, he certainly has to feel used as this story has come to light. Dionne appears to feel that there is a potential for some social conservatives within the GOP to turn on DeLay as some of these type of deals come to light. Frank Wolf (R-VA) is specifically pointed out as a strident opponent of gambling who has clashed with Abramoff in the past. Will he feel compelled to stand up for Tom DeLay if it becomes increasingly obvious that DeLay simply played factions against each other for personal gain? IMO, the House GOP faces a crisis in keeping DeLay around. He could very well bring down Republican control of the House if more damaging material comes to light. Republicans may well be forced to choose between him and the possibility of Speaker Pelosi. Posted by Abel Rabinowitz at March 15, 2005 10:21 AMComments
Wishful thinking at best. We have been hearing about this sort of stuff for years. The Democratic Party is by definition more divided than the GOP. Not that it matters. There is little danger of a revolt in either party absent a huge scandal. This won't amount to much. The bottom line is that a political party that has to hope for a scandal on the other side is pretty much rat-fucked. (See, e.g., the GOP circa 1996) Removing Delay won’t change anything because there are 200+ wannabe Delays waiting for a chance to take his place. |
Archives
January 2006
December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
A Pattern to Break...
Friday Open Thread 50 State Centrist Strategy Republican Division, Even in Texas Opposites Attract? The End of Insight? Is the Party Over? Hugo Goes to Economics Camp Obligatory Rose Bowl Thread White Washing History
|