A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

February 28, 2005

Chat With Chris Whitman... Well, Sort Of

The online chat with Chris Whitman at "mypartytoo.com" was anything but. Basically, it consisted of her, or her advisers, picking seven softball questions from those that where submitted this last week, and posting answers on the website. If you are interested than go here.

This is a little disheartening. Chris Whitman is a brave woman, and this is about as canned a version of an online chat as you can get. In case they didn't notice, the moderates aren't exactly in power within the GOP. What we need is vibrant and diverse communication about what we can do to take our party back, not a politician answering the questions she wants and passing it off as a discussion.

This makes me think even more that Whitman is preparing to run, and I don't mean for the New Jersey senate seat. The trouble is I don't think moderates can win either party's nomination with the Karl Rove canned version of political strategy… Conservatives or Liberals can get away with it because they have less to prove to the base. In short, I expected better.

Posted by Mathew at February 28, 2005 04:28 PM
Comments

Further, Whitman just reinforces the view that conservatives in my party hold pertaining to "moderates," that they're soft and mushy and weak and can't be trusted to stand up for themselves. The most successful moderates in recent years have been pols like Ross Perot, Jesse Ventura, Rudy, and Arnold. The reason is that all these mods come across as tough, strong, and principled.

I think Christie is probably running for Senate. I know many disagree, but I just don't see her as a nat'l player. Her book showed her political savviness, and that savviness would certainly inform her that the path to the GOP nod does not come through writing books critical of the base. She's probably trying to lay a foundation for Corzine's Senate seat.

Posted by: Dave at February 28, 2005 05:00 PM

She was very forthright in her talk at Harvard, which I blogged a few weeks ago. She took unscripted questions from the audience--though she asked that they be written down in advance and read by the moderator, rather than having a give and take with the questioner. Still, there were some sharp questions, which she did not evade.

At that time, she said she wasn't planning on running for anything, so she could speak freely. Perhaps she may run for Corzine's seat, and has become more circumspect.

Posted by: rickheller at February 28, 2005 05:37 PM

Not good to hear...

Posted by: Daniel at February 28, 2005 07:26 PM

A couple of weeks ago, she was a guest on a local NPR talk show, the Diane Rehm Show. She took caller questions. I recall her being asked about her EPA tenure and she was quite proud of it. The callers asked her questions about her. I don't recall any questions like the ones on the web site.

I took the questions as to explain the PAC, its creation and purpose and not about her politically. I couldn't find a date/time for the online chat so I frankly forgot about it.

Posted by: EG at February 28, 2005 07:32 PM

I lived through two terms of Christie as governor. Admittedly, I have blocked most of the experience as unpleasant but I can say that I am not surprised by the descriptions of her as soft, etc. She cut taxes by thirty percent (in order to prove her conservative creds) during her term and, like all good pols, did almost nothing to control the expense side and had to borrow a lot of money to balance the budget.

Please do not mistake my comments as supportive of the Dems ~ they have been equally irresponsible. However, the mess she left will require a massive amount of effort to clean-up. Whatever pain that requires will undoubtedly land squarely on the Dems since they now control the state government.

BTW, I will resist saying never but I don't think she has a chance at a Senate seat ~ she is simply not that popular in NJ.

Posted by: Jack (CommonSenseDesk) at February 28, 2005 07:56 PM

I think if Whitman wanted to be a Seanator she would have run against Torricelli... You don't write a book about national politics without thinking nationally. I also disagree that writing a book bashing the base is a bad way to go. I think if Whitman or any other moderate gets a nomination it will be because they have created a new base.

Posted by: Mathew at March 1, 2005 08:24 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661