|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 30, 2005Those Uber-Civilized Germans'If you don't take a job as a prostitute, we can stop your benefits' A 25-year-old waitress who turned down a job providing "sexual services'' at a brothel in Berlin faces possible cuts to her unemployment benefit under laws introduced this year. Euro-socialism, anyone? Posted by Tully at January 30, 2005 10:57 PMComments
I don't think many people forsaw this result. Read the article. They foresaw it. They couldn't come up with any legal reason to stop it. So they didn't try. The government had considered making brothels an exception on moral grounds, but decided that it would be too difficult to distinguish them from bars. As a result, job centres must treat employers looking for a prostitute in the same way as those looking for a dental nurse. Some job centers are trying to dodge around it. And the brothels are getting ready to sue them. Ulrich Kueperkoch wanted to open a brothel in Goerlitz, in former East Germany, but his local job centre withdrew his advertisement for 12 prostitutes, saying it would be impossible to find them. Mr Kueperkoch said that he was confident of demand for a brothel in the area and planned to take a claim for compensation to the highest court. Prostitution was legalised in Germany in 2002 because the government believed that this would help to combat trafficking in women and cut links to organised crime. So now instead of combatting trafficking in women, the German government is assisting it, and financially coercing the reluctant. Institutionally forcing women into prostitution is just one more step in in the EU Limbo: how low can you go? Posted by: Dave Schuler at January 31, 2005 11:01 AMIs this real? It seems beyond belief? Posted by: Chris at January 31, 2005 01:34 PMI'd love to see it debunked, Chris. I'm hoping it's exaggerated or outright false. But I fear it is not. And if it's true, I hope the Germans come to their senses right quick. Posted by: Tully at January 31, 2005 02:00 PMIn this case "the government" means a particular federal agency right? The result in question is due to a "regulation", which means it wasn't explicitly detailed by law, but instead extrapolated by some bureaucrats in a federal agency. It's possible that the legislature might not like this result at all, and pass a new law which overrides the regulation. Until the legislature has a few months to react, I don't think it's fair to condemn the entire government for the result, let alone the whole society. Posted by: Susan at January 31, 2005 02:15 PMAll too true, Susan. Details that I'd really like to see are sadly lacking. Which particular bureaucrats dodged the hard questions (and decisions) on this one? What do the German people think about this? And how long will it take them to do something about it--if they do? Who (if anyone) in government is trying to get it changed? Or will it become standard policy? Posted by: Tully at January 31, 2005 02:37 PMI expect this gets fixed, and sooner rather than later. Some sort of out for moral consciencious objection which will become a loophole fit for big trucks. Susan's right that we shouldn't leap to condemn the entire German system based on this. But it sure is a disgrace that it even got this far, aint it? Posted by: bk at January 31, 2005 03:16 PMLet's hear it for legalized prostitution. Posted by: Oberon at January 31, 2005 09:48 PMWe already have Congress! Who needs more? Posted by: Tully at January 31, 2005 10:14 PMSnopes is indicating this may be an urban legend. Posted by: David Fleck at February 1, 2005 03:12 PMThe only part of it not sourced is the subject of the article, who is unnamed. Which means it could be a "reaction" piece as SNOPES implies. But the rest of the sourcing is there, idnicating (a) that is indeed the legal situation, and (b) some brothel owners mean to sue to enforce it. I'd be happy if they lost. Posted by: Tully at February 1, 2005 05:28 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|