|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
November 29, 2004Mass. Supreme Judicial Court is RepublicanBy way of updating this post, the Supreme Court of the United States today denied certiorari in--declined to review--the Goodridge decision (establishing a right to same-sex marriage in Massachusetts based on the state constitution) on Guarantee Clause grounds. The order for Largess v. Supreme Judicial Court, No. 04-420, can be found here under Certiorari Denied, in case number order. Posted by The Jaded JD at November 29, 2004 12:20 PMComments
The US Supreme Court consistently declines to hear more than 95% of the cases presented to it for review. News stories often neglect to mention this fact when making a big deal about the Supreme Court declining to hear a particular case. I wouldn't read too much into it. Posted by: Susan at November 29, 2004 05:59 PMSCOTUS in the modern era tends to hear roughly 1% of the cases filed--84 arguments out of 8,255 cases in OT2002 and 88 out of 7,924 in OT2001. Chief Justice's 2003 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary. The OT2003 data aren't available yet. All I read into the denial of cert in Largess is that the nonjusticiability of the Guarantee Clause remains, in most cases, settled law. Posted by: The Jaded JD at November 29, 2004 08:43 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|