A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

November 22, 2004

MoveOn's Next Move

You got to hand it to MoveOn.org. Despite a record of electoral losses, they run an efficient ship. They've already held a round of post-election house parties to identify new priorities.


In the preliminary results of the instant polling, some 200 house parties voted for election reform, with the war in Iraq coming in a close second at 170 votes. This pleased the organizers, since they're already circulating a petition calling on Congress to "investigate the integrity of the voting process in the 2004 election." I can't help wondering if "election reform" qualifies as one of those "few issues we can easily sell to voters in the Midwest" that one participant called for earlier. The house parties voted, with an overwhelming 428 votes, for "crafting a clear progressive message," as the best strategy for achieving MoveOn's goal. (Apparently, almost no one thinks a "move to the center" would be a good idea.)

Electoral reform sounds like a good idea to me, but even if it does succeed, it's not clear to me it would result in Democrats getting elected. It also smacks of denial--we can't really be in the minority, it must be electoral fraud.

Posted by rickheller at November 22, 2004 11:04 PM
Comments

As a Republican, albeit one who supported Kerry, I'm a firm believer in electoral reform. What I don't want to see is the credibility of bipartisan efforts to improve election processes and procedures undermined by discredited organizations. We have real challenges facing us, and it will be difficult enough to sell the idea of investigating and reforming those who won in 2004.

I'd like to see progress on the free federal election ID, paper backups/receipts for electronic voting systems, and uniform procedures for voter registration/purging. What I don't want is paranoid suspicions of election tampering or stealing in 2004 to contaminate that process. NC at least had very real electronic voting problems that made the difference in local elections there, though not at the presidential level, and they deserve attention.

Posted by: The Jaded JD at November 22, 2004 11:19 PM

Ah, the inherent survival instinct of the funded bureaucracy...ain't it amusing? They just can't seem to Move On!

Posted by: Tully at November 22, 2004 11:31 PM

I hope Move On and like minded folks like Kos stay involved... It is sure to mean the defeat of the radical liberals they endorse. I say more power to them. By the way... How did Dean's dozen fair in the last election... Hmmm?

What do they mean by electoral reform?

Posted by: Mathew at November 23, 2004 09:56 AM

I have one idea for electoral reform...

BAN 527's!!!!!

Posted by: Mathew at November 23, 2004 09:57 AM

They could sure use them in the Ukraine.

Posted by: Chris at November 23, 2004 12:54 PM

If ever there was an organization that was a shining example of selective outrage, it would be MoveOn.org. As much as I dislike Bush, I have even more contempt for MoveOn.

Posted by: Don T. Know at November 24, 2004 08:30 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661