A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

November 11, 2004

Specter on Moderates

Howard Bashman's How Appealing has a link to this Philadelphia Inquirer interview with Senator Arlen Specter. The most relevant section is excerpted below.

"It's important for the party but it's also important to the country that the Republican Party has balance," Specter said. "And there are a lot of independents and swing Democrats who look to see that there are moderate voices in the Republican Party."

Recalling his short-lived campaign for the presidential nomination in 1996, Specter said he never harbored any illusions about being the GOP nominee, but he was struck by the fact that he, as the only candidate in the field supporting abortion rights, received only token support from moderates.

"There really is an urgent need for more vocal participation by moderates and pro-choice Republicans," he said.

Specter said he had recently sought out other moderate GOP members of the Senate. Though he declined to characterize those conversations, he said the only way they could remain relevant was to assert themselves.

The latest episode over the Judiciary Committee chairmanship was just a skirmish in a longer siege, Specter said.

"It's a very important battle," he said. "And it's really a battle for balance in the party and it's really a battle for balance in America."

Posted by The Jaded JD at November 11, 2004 08:14 AM
Comments

I wonder if he's stripped of his chairmanship, whether he'd consider becoming an Independent

Posted by: rickheller at November 11, 2004 12:22 PM

I think that's very unlikely, mostly because unlike the Jim Jeffords situation in 2000, there's no way he can alter the chamber's control. When Jeffords switched, he was given the Education Committee chairmanship the GOP stripped from him by the Democrats when the switch gave them control. Specter wins nothing by disaffiliating, unless he takes 4 or 5 with him.

Snowe, Collins, Chaffee, McCain, and Gregg aren't going to switch. Yet.

Posted by: The Jaded JD at November 11, 2004 12:56 PM

I just had a chill run up my back as I read that last sentence JD. Suddenly I saw a group of enough moderate Republicans who could, if they chose, become a swing block in the Senate and thereby gain tremendous influence, whether or not they jumped the Republican ship in name. Could be something to watch in the next few years.

Posted by: jmauzy at November 12, 2004 09:38 AM

Jeff,

Now you're where I am. We're gaining critical mass. But we have to learn how to recognize when we've gotten critical mass before we're picked off.

Posted by: The Jaded JD at November 12, 2004 05:54 PM

Specter will get the chair. Grumpy conservatives just made a point on a slow news day.

Posted by: wizard61 at November 14, 2004 01:33 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661