A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

October 29, 2004

IAEA Al-Qaqaa Document

Fox News has obtained and published an IAEA Action Team Confidential document dated 2003-01-14 that is a record of the monitoring inspection of Al-Qaqaa. This is the document referenced by ABC News and mentioned in an earlier post.

This is the key quote from the ABC News article:

The documents show IAEA inspectors looked at nine bunkers containing more than 194 tons of HMX at the facility. Although these bunkers were still under IAEA seal, the inspectors said the seals may be potentially ineffective because they had ventilation slats on the sides. These slats could be easily removed to remove the materials inside the bunkers without breaking the seals, the inspectors noted.

These are the exact words from the IAEA document:

All the 9 HMX bunkers were sealed after the verification by attaching metal seals on their front entrance doors. Of note was that the sealing of the bunkers was only partially effective because each bunker had ventilation shafts on the sides of the buildings. These shafts were not sealed, and could provide removal routes for the HMX while leaving the front door locked.

Note the difference between the ABC News description of the document and the actual document: whereas ABC News uses the phrase "ventiliation slats," the IAEA document uses the phrase "ventiliation shafts." Perhaps the ABC reporter was describing slats that partially covered the shafts. In any event, the use of the word "shaft" causes me to visualize a larger opening into the bunkers than I did before reading the IAEA document.

What we don't have is an explanation for the IAEA allowing the bunkers to be constructed in a manner that "could provide removal routes for the HMX while leaving the front door locked." The bunkers were not really sealed, and the IAEA knew it. Maybe the Bush administration had some good reasons for not trusting the UN inspectors.

Posted by at October 29, 2004 12:14 AM
Comments

Stop. Please. We have beat this subject to death.

Posted by: Todd Pearson at October 29, 2004 12:35 AM

Another quote from the ABC article. I can't help but wonder what else the IAEA got wrong in it's statement the other day.

But the confidential IAEA documents obtained by ABC News show that on Jan. 14, 2003, the agency's inspectors recorded that just over three tons of RDX were stored at the facility — a considerable discrepancy from what the Iraqis reported.


The IAEA documents could mean that 138 tons of explosives were removed from the facility long before the United States launched "Operation Iraqi Freedom" in March 2003.

Posted by: Donald at October 29, 2004 12:38 AM

Maybe we could have a daily Al-Qaqaa thread. I, for one, am annoyed that we have become, for all practical purposes, a single issue blog as we approach Election Day.

Posted by: Todd Pearson at October 29, 2004 12:44 AM

Todd, I suspect it's campaign overload. We all know nothing really meaningful will be said by any of the politicos for the next several days, and the weekend Halloween parties aren't here yet. So we beat on the one thing out there that has any meat at all to it, even if it's not much.

I think it's time for a campaign humor thread. The Best of....

JibJab could lead off.

Posted by: Tully at October 29, 2004 01:37 AM

Don't like the Al Qaqaa posts? Talk to Mark Schulman. It has been he alone who saw the need for a new post every time his scouring of the internet turned up another attempted refutation of the situation.

Now ask yourself why he has been given the right to do so on a supposedly Centrist website.

Posted by: Jeremy at October 29, 2004 09:13 AM

Everyone recongizes the Anybody-But-Bush crowd; we call them ABB for short.

Why don't we recognize the NBB's -- the Never-Blame-Bush crowd?

Posted by: Oberon at October 29, 2004 09:33 AM

Why don't we recognize the NBB's -- the Never-Blame-Bush crowd

Or maybe some of us recognize there is no such thing as a perfect war.

Good thing you guys weren't around during WWII. FDR would have had a hell of a time.

Posted by: Donald at October 30, 2004 01:48 AM

As Harry Truman did.

Posted by: Tully at October 30, 2004 05:07 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661