|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 27, 2004Hitch and Kaus for Kerry. Really?Endorsements may not matter, and it's no surprise that Slate's writers are liberal, but I am mildly surprised that Hitchens and Kaus both will support Kerry. Kaus has been the biggest Kerry basher among Democrats aside from Zell Miller, Hitchens used to be a leftist, of course, but seemed to be on a trajectory to the right. Posted by rickheller at October 27, 2004 05:27 PMComments
Kaus declared for Kerry a while back and announced he was sending a campaign donation, but Hitchens' decision is a surprise. Just last week he wrote an article titled "Why I'm (Slightly) for Bush." Posted by: Todd Pearson at October 27, 2004 06:06 PMHitchens is a flip flopper. :) Sorry...LOL..it had to be said. Posted by: carla at October 27, 2004 08:26 PMI don't consider Hitchens to be a flip-flopper. Instead, I consider his recent transformation of the past four years to mirror many centrists' in the Democratic Party. Hitchens eventually would never indorse a candidate who proposed a constitutional ban on same sex marriages, who openly endorses extra-funding for faith based institutions, and further deregulated the telecommunications industry. His waivering on a Kerry endorsement, I believe, comes as a result of personal conflict in observing the American Left's abandonment of its Human Rights philosophy in the build up to war in Iraq and utter venom in its effots to defeat President Bush. In 2002, Hitchens publicly inquired of the Left, "Haven't we been trying to have Saddam Hussein tried as a War Criminal and dethroned for twenty years?" (paraphrasing). He realized the irony of the Left's rejection of Bush's Wilsonian vision. He noted with puzzlement the fact that it had been Liberals and the Left who had been advocating greater American involvment in spreading human rights and democracy across the world, including through the use of military force. Remember the old (retired) addage, "Democrats always want a smaller military to send everywhere, while Republicans always want a larger military to send nowhere,"? And he concluded hypocracy of the Left when they rejected the effort to rid the world of a War Criminal meglomaniacal dictator, because the effort was spearheaded by a Right Wing Republican, W. Bush. So, I think it was the same conscious wrestling many centrists did when they heard John Kerry comparing his foreign policy to George Bush the First's (Realist) and the President comparing his foreign policy to John Kennedy's (Idealist). However, Hitchens concluded, as many Centrists have and will display next Tuesday, that in the totality of the circumstances, a little dose of Realism in foreign policy pales in comparison to the importance of repositioning every other policy back to the center where it belongs. I'm glad to see Hitchens joining the ranks of the Rising Center. I'm siding with carla on the Hitchens count - what, Chris, you fell into peer pressure? Posted by: Rachel at October 28, 2004 11:42 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|