A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

October 27, 2004

Hitch and Kaus for Kerry. Really?

Endorsements may not matter, and it's no surprise that Slate's writers are liberal, but I am mildly surprised that Hitchens and Kaus both will support Kerry. Kaus has been the biggest Kerry basher among Democrats aside from Zell Miller, Hitchens used to be a leftist, of course, but seemed to be on a trajectory to the right.

Posted by rickheller at October 27, 2004 05:27 PM
Comments

Kaus declared for Kerry a while back and announced he was sending a campaign donation, but Hitchens' decision is a surprise. Just last week he wrote an article titled "Why I'm (Slightly) for Bush."

Posted by: Todd Pearson at October 27, 2004 06:06 PM

Hitchens is a flip flopper. :)

Sorry...LOL..it had to be said.

Posted by: carla at October 27, 2004 08:26 PM

I don't consider Hitchens to be a flip-flopper. Instead, I consider his recent transformation of the past four years to mirror many centrists' in the Democratic Party. Hitchens eventually would never indorse a candidate who proposed a constitutional ban on same sex marriages, who openly endorses extra-funding for faith based institutions, and further deregulated the telecommunications industry. His waivering on a Kerry endorsement, I believe, comes as a result of personal conflict in observing the American Left's abandonment of its Human Rights philosophy in the build up to war in Iraq and utter venom in its effots to defeat President Bush. In 2002, Hitchens publicly inquired of the Left, "Haven't we been trying to have Saddam Hussein tried as a War Criminal and dethroned for twenty years?" (paraphrasing). He realized the irony of the Left's rejection of Bush's Wilsonian vision. He noted with puzzlement the fact that it had been Liberals and the Left who had been advocating greater American involvment in spreading human rights and democracy across the world, including through the use of military force. Remember the old (retired) addage, "Democrats always want a smaller military to send everywhere, while Republicans always want a larger military to send nowhere,"?

And he concluded hypocracy of the Left when they rejected the effort to rid the world of a War Criminal meglomaniacal dictator, because the effort was spearheaded by a Right Wing Republican, W. Bush. So, I think it was the same conscious wrestling many centrists did when they heard John Kerry comparing his foreign policy to George Bush the First's (Realist) and the President comparing his foreign policy to John Kennedy's (Idealist). However, Hitchens concluded, as many Centrists have and will display next Tuesday, that in the totality of the circumstances, a little dose of Realism in foreign policy pales in comparison to the importance of repositioning every other policy back to the center where it belongs.

I'm glad to see Hitchens joining the ranks of the Rising Center.
Welcome.

Posted by: sp at October 28, 2004 09:18 AM

I'm siding with carla on the Hitchens count - what, Chris, you fell into peer pressure?

Posted by: Rachel at October 28, 2004 11:42 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661