|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 22, 2004Kerry's 10,000 LawyersAs November 2 nears, the likelihood of another contested election is growing. If it happens, Kerry's advisers say they will be ready. An Associated Press reporter traveling with the Kerry campaign reports the following: Six SWAT teams of lawyers and political operatives will be situated around the country with fueled-up jets awaiting Kerry's orders to speed to a battleground state. The teams have been told to be ready to fly on the evening of the election to begin mounting legal and political fights. Every battleground state will have a SWAT team within an hour of its borders. I don't have any information on the Bush battle plan, but I'd bet it's at least as formidable as Kerry's. As a Floridian, I hope and pray that whichever candidate carries our state does so by a substantial margin. Once is enough! Posted by at October 22, 2004 12:55 AMComments
I hope so too, but it can only be big Bush. Kerry might win, but only a close one. Bush is more likely to win a close one, too. And the laws -- what happens when voters violate the voter reg laws, but still want to vote? Posted by: Tom Grey - Liberty Dad at October 22, 2004 04:18 AMYeah, Floridians are not eager to go through this again, to say the least. I grew up in Pensacola ... and my parents are still down there. We always talk about how it's going to be desided either down there or here in Ohio (or both). Also, FYI, here's the lead from the top story, above the fold, in the Columbus Dispatch this morning: Voters Report Fake CallsPosted by: William Swann at October 22, 2004 09:32 AM ...yeah, I notice how much evidence he had: slim and none! Krauthammer should shiftcareers into fiction, since he seems tohave a very active imagination.... Of course, the historical record of secret plans isn't too good. Nixon was outright lying when he said he had a secret plan. Chances are, if Kerry had a good plan, he would've explained it. Posted by: Jon Kay at October 22, 2004 10:15 AM(X-posted, Jon?) It would have been helpful of the Columbus Dispatch to note the party registration of the people being called. The "we'll carry in your ballot" scam is in an old one, usually targeting nursing homes and the home-bound elderly. On the way to the mailbox the absentee ballots somehow end up all turning into votes for one side. This is one of the reasons for false registrations requesting absentee ballots--to have blanks to substitute in for authentic ones. Posted by: Tully at October 22, 2004 10:45 AMYep, that would've been helpful, Tully. Sounds like a professional operation, whoever's doing it. That suggests they probably have voter lists or some kind of information about party ID. Posted by: William Swann at October 22, 2004 11:18 AMThe voter rolls are public info, WIlliam, and available to everyone, and usually include voting records (if you voted and when, not for whom). I get the complete county database on CD every coupla weeks during campaign season, in order to target new registers and absentee ballot requesters for clients. (No point sending them a "day before election" mailer if they mailed their ballot in two weeks ago! You time the mailers to show up in the mail the same day as the ballot.) So do several dozen (at least!) people and orgs. All legit. But that doesn't mean it can't be abused, and easily. This is why I harp on the less obvious forms of voter fraud, and greatly object to attempts to make it easier to cheat. Like allowing "show up" voting for the unregistered, even in the wrong precinct, or not requiring ID to register and/or vote. Both of which the Dems are in a national full-court legal press to get allowed this time around. It's not about disenfranchisement, and the pros know it full well. It's about facilitating vote fraud. Most of these vote scams are old ones, just enhanced with modern technology. The most familiar scam of all is ballot-box stuffing, of course. Even if you know the box was stuffed, if you can't tell which votes are fraudulent you have to honor them all anyway. Galling. Posted by: Tully at October 22, 2004 11:33 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|