A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

June 29, 2004

Worth a Look!

Stumbled across a new "militant moderate" blog called Tutakai that's worth a look. This post in particular caught my eye.

The first thing to understand about being a moderate is that almost no one will ever believe that you actually are a moderate. Bizarre as it may sound, people will believe that their right to label you trumps any right of yours to describe your own beliefs. They may create "tests" that you have to meet before they will consent to consider you a moderate -- generally, these tests will involve you agreeing with them in both style and substance.

That leads to the second curious experience about being a moderate -- most political junkies will not only label you, but will almost automatically assume that the appropriate label is "enemy". As a moderate, you will be assumed to be on the other side. The offense of disagreeing with extremist partisans of either wing about anything is nearly always sufficient to render you a presumed member of the vast right- or left-wing conspiracy.


Ring any bells, folks?

Posted by Tully at June 29, 2004 02:20 PM
Comments

Utterly, totally, completely on target.

It's often paired with corollary observations, such as:

The political spectrum has shifted, so that those currently called "moderates" are what used to be on the opposite (i.e. wrong) side of the spectrum. And those who used to be called "moderates" are now cozied up with us on the "correct" side of the aisle.

Thus, they can claim that moderates are bad -- e.g., really batting for the other team -- and that their side of the aisle represents true moderation. A nifty twofer!

Posted by: William Swann at June 29, 2004 02:50 PM

Just read the rest of his piece, and I don't know that I've encountered a more eloquent single explanation or defense of a certain brand of centrism that he calls "militant moderation".

I think it's pretty close to what I often call "bold centrism".

He's right, and he's also an outstanding writer. I wonder if we can find ways to get this piece in front of more people.

Posted by: William Swann at June 29, 2004 03:06 PM

Let's try asking...I'm willing to beg! He just got the blog started--I sincerely hope he keeps right on rolling.

I found it via Joe Gandleman.

Posted by: Tully at June 29, 2004 06:12 PM

Cool. I left a message in his comments section, and also added his post as one of our "Hot Topics" links at the Centrist Coalition site.

What would be really cool is if he were picked up by some of the more popular left or right blogs -- particularly the more reasonable ones like Kevin Drum or Tacitus.

Posted by: William Swann at June 29, 2004 06:18 PM

I appreciate the (very) positive feedback and hope I can continue to live up to these kinds of reviews! :)

I'm fairly prolific in writing and hope to be able to contribute more broadly in the future. I'm very happy to see things distributed around and I would be quite thrilled is I were asked to write opinion or comment pieces anywhere.

Posted by: Tutakai at June 29, 2004 07:40 PM

Hey ... welcome!

We'd be more than happy to post any of your writings here, if you like. Email me at wswann@mindleaders.com, and I can send you a logon and password.

There also might be other opportunities out there either in blog-land or traditional op-ed land to write from a centrist perspective. I've often wondered why there aren't at least a few columnists with an overtly centrist perspective. John Avlon is doing that in his New York Sun column, and you have guys like David Broder, who is generally centrist -- but, on the whole, very few actually argue overtly that moderate or centrist politics is the right direction.

I've only read a few of your pieces, but you seem to have the skills for something like that.

Posted by: William Swann at June 29, 2004 08:07 PM

Really well written stuff, on target, well said. A welcome addition to the ranks.

Posted by: bk at June 30, 2004 08:59 AM

You know there is a value to partisan politics. For one thing, it helps keep corruption down, b/c both sides will be quick to point out the other's corruption. And they will press for thorough investigations. Centrism is a good starting-point, but it should never be a final destination. Look, there are real differences btw liberals and conservatives, right and left, that cannot be compromised without compromising valuable principles.

Posted by: Bo at June 30, 2004 08:31 PM

Bo,

I think the kind of "militant moderate" philosophy Tutakai is advocating isn't necessarily a compromise of valuable principles. It's more of an acknowledgement that good ideas can come from both the right and the left, and that contrasting and weighing both perspectives will likely yield a more comprehensive and honest analysis. At least that's my take on it.

Posted by: PurpleStater at July 1, 2004 03:00 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661