|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
June 29, 2004Supreme Court Rebuffs BushThe Supreme Court, including the conservative justices aside from Thomas, ruled decisively against the Bush Administration policy of holding people indefinitely without due process. While I've rejected post-9/11 civil libertarian protests in other areas, the Administration's stance on holding people, especially American citizens, in a completely arbitrary manner has been way too aggressive. Posted by rickheller at June 29, 2004 09:05 AMComments
Yup, good for the system... It works. I guess I would rather have them be rebuked for being too tough, than have people die because they were not tough enough. Of course the ACLU will be foaming at the mouth to make some ridiculous connection between this decision and the Patriot Act. Posted by: Mathew at June 29, 2004 10:56 AMYes, I continue to support the Patriot Act. As far as I can tell, the Administration positions ruled against were not related to or supported by it. Posted by: rickheller at June 29, 2004 12:40 PMObvious and overdue. Scary to me that one of these decisions had a 5-4 vote. Not much noise out there about the other recent decision regarding the finding that you can be arrested for failure to identify yourself. Apparently, even though we have the right to remain silent AND the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, you might get locked up if you don't answer a cop's questions. Reason's Tim Lynch has a good take. I think the court has lately (last decade or so) been issuing a series of confusing rulings regarding civil rights that taken as a whole seem to lack consistent overarching guiding principles. It seems pretty likely to me that if a 2nd Bush term yields a few more conservative appointments, the court may back away from past principles in favor of a much more agreeable view towards authoritarianism. I know many of you guys are so pro-security in the face of terrorism that you dismiss such views, but IMO there has been a constant whittling going on. We're getting nickled and dimed to death. Posted by: bk at June 29, 2004 12:50 PMI have to agree with bk on this one. I just wish more of the actions of courts could be front page news so that people can see and judge for themselves about such issues like identifying (sp) yourself, etc. Posted by: Rachel at June 30, 2004 11:53 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|