|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
June 24, 2004Kerry Message Begins Leaning Toward CenterKerry is running as a centrist.
Do you buy it? I do. If Kerry is elected, but at least one house of Congress remains Republican, which seems likely, I think he would be forced to govern as a centrist. Posted by rickheller at June 24, 2004 11:04 PMComments
Do you buy it? I can buy that he's running as a centrist, but not that he is a centrist, because his entire political history argues against it. On the other hand I don't fear a Kerry presidency because I think you're absolutely correct that he would be forced to rule as a centrist in the face of a Republican or divided Congress, much as Clinton was after 1994. Posted by: Tully at June 24, 2004 11:42 PMI think he is a politician. When running from his homestate he is a New England liberal, when running for the Presidency he moves to the center. I think Kerry is smart, and will more than likely govern from the center, or at least left of center especially since it is likely that one if not both houses of Congress will be under Republican control (I would argue that the Democrats are going to take back the Senate). I do disagree with the notion that Kerry's career has been that of a garden variety liberal (after doing some research). He voted with his party in the eighties, but in his latter years he has shown some glimmer of hope by pissing off the UAW by sponsoring a bill that would tighten fuel efficiency standards, and breaking from his party to vote for the Clinton/Republican Congress balanced budget. I think the problem with Kerry, is we do not know which one will show up on any given day. I have pointed out several things he has said in the last few weeks that I have liked. His message is coming together nicely, and the Bush administration is falling apart and they are relying on the "don't vote for him, he's an elitist liberal" message too much. This been said, two months ago I thought Bush's message was dead on and Kerry's was a flop, and there is a lot of time left. I think there are a few things coming up that are key for Kerry: 1. The running mate - My fear is that he is going to pick Gephardt because it makes the most sense, but the former Majority Leader and Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack will be poor choices that eventually will validate Kerry's tax and spend liberal status in the mind's of voter's. I think he has got to go with Edwards or someone with centrist appeal. Wes Clark is smart, but weird... I think most voters are scared of him. I heard the other day that Kerry interviewed Governor Kathleen Sebelius of Kansas and Senator John Breaux from Louisiana... Both would be great choices. 2. The Convention - Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and Al Gore should be kept in the back, while Bill Clinton, Harold Ford, Mary Landrieu, Blanche Lincoln, and other like minded moderates, need to be the face of the party. Kerry cannot resort to the same class warfare argument like Gore did in 2000. If he sounds like a Democrat of the eighties he will lose like a Democrat from the eighties. 3. Social Security - This issue is no longer the third rail. The Bush campaign is deciding whether to make an issue out of social security. If they do, you can bet it will be a very well prepared and fine tuned campaign. Kerry cannot come back with the same "scare the senior citizens" approach that the Democrats have relied on for too long. A majority of people under 40 do not believe in Social Security or that it will be around for them when they retire. If Bush gives them a well articulated alternative, Kerry will have to come up with more than an anti-privatization argument. 3. The Debates - They cannot underestimate Bush like Gore did and come off as a condescending liberal elitist. Kerry should take heart that the American people are not as quick on the issues as he is, and if he talks to them like he would talk to a group of policy wonks it will not be good. 4. The Message - Kerry should keep on the path of making policy proposals and explaining why in those specific areas Bush has failed. The Al Gore, Howard Dean, angry liberal approach will in the end abandon voters. Nobody has ever been elected President of the United States on a negative, angry message. Posted by: Mathew at June 25, 2004 09:22 AMPart of what I fear about Kerry is that because he's so susceptible to the power of suggestion, he may get pulled to the far left by the wingnuts in his own party. Seeing the droves of Michael Moore worshipers who believe Bush lied for oil scares me that these people will have access to the White House if Kerry is elected. He needs to denounce these wingnuts and keep reaffirming a strong stance against terrorism to win me over. Mathew, trust me on this--Sebelius would be a lousy choice. She's a ex-patriate child of the old Daley machine who married into the Kansas Democrats. She would never have been elected here in Kansas if the moderate candidates in the GOP primary hadn't gotten clobbered by vote-splitting, resulting in a far-right nut on the GOP ticket that the GOP moderates couldn't stomach. Posted by: Tully at June 27, 2004 06:25 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|