|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
June 24, 2004A Centrist Republican's Wet DreamFrom Boi From Troy: The lead article in today's New York Times took me by surprise... it was a rather lengthy piece praising the successful 7-month governorship of Arnold Schwarzenegger. In it, the Governor promotes his vision for participating in the Republican National Convention later this summer in New York... A GOP Convention with Schwarzenegger headlining--rather than Tom DeLay, for example--would go a long way towards easing reservations that financial-freedom and personal freedom-loving moderates like myself have developed recently. In fact, Schwarzenegger should speak on Monday night--the first night of the Convention, shortly after the platform is adopted (Pardon me as I shudder at the thought of what might be in that platform). He should say, "this is how you win elections...and this is how you govern." The theme would resonate through the evening, as New York's unlikely Republicans--Governor Pataki and Mayor Bloomberg--will also share the stage. Now, since The VP nominee (Cheney? McCain?) will speak on Wednesday and President Bush on Thursday will accept his nomination, we just have to figure out what to do on Tuesday. I have long held out hope that in his second term, without political pressure from the hardliners in his party, the President would govern as the centrist to conservative leader he was as the Governor of Texas.... Pro-education, bi-partisan, fiscally conservative, socially moderate... As time has gone on I have wondered about the wisdom or realistic possiblity of this hope. The Republican Convention in NYC has the potential to restore my faith or crush it altogether. I nominate General Colin Powell or Christie Todd Whitman to speak on Tuesday night, or how about *gasp*, former Mass. Governor William Weld. Any feisty New England moderate would do...
Comments
Mathew, As a Dallas, TX resident, I have to wonder where you lived during the 90's to have that impression of Bush's service as governor. His excessive alliance with business interests, especially, was quite pronounced. He simply does not see that sometimes government needs to ensure that business is conducted in a way that benefits citizens as well as stockholders. Well, not really stockholders as much as the good ol' boy network -- the guys who run business in this state. Yes, he made progress in education by working with the Dems, especially by letting Bob Bullock take him under his wing. And he was careful not to appear to deferential too the theocratic right that is so powerful in the Texas GOP. (Tom Pauken even quit as state chairman because of that.) Ok. Sorry if I sound miffed, but I have to breathe Dallas' polluted air that GWB's policies did absolutely nothing to improve. (Seriously. I get headaches this time of year as we have orange and red ozone days.) Anyway, my real point is that Bush now has a record, and to hope that he will have different policies simply because he can't run again is a bit of wishful thinking. Mathew, we can't wish our way into the future. I too wish GWB's policies had been more in line with his rhetoric, but they haven't been. I don't think the public will reward him for this. Current polls indicate that most believe we need to be on a different track. As do I. As for the GOP: I yearn for the moderate party of the 60's and early 70's. That was my party. But the southern influence is not likely to lessen in the near future, pulling the party in a hard right, anti-eastern-elite direction. I know McCain is trying to figure out how to pull the GOP back to the center. I wish him well, but I think it's a futile effort for the next decade or so. (With that I'm off to Vegas for a few days. I'll check back next week.) Posted by: Erasmus at June 24, 2004 11:36 PMErasmus, Forgive me... I do not know enough about Bush's policies in Texas to comment intelligently. The impression to the rest of the country though was that he was centrist to conservative Republican like his father who favored spending more on education, and was more moderate on social issues. I remember a George W. Bush who even said in his campaign for Governor the first time around that the Republican Party should not rely on lower taxes as it's central message - which I totally agree with. I fully admit that my perception may not have actually been reality. My wish that his policies would be different in a second term is in large part due to the fact that although I did not agree with Bush all of the time I certainly did not see an alternative from the other side. I do think, however, that Kerry is making progress, but in the end I just do not believe that Bush is the evil bastard that some on the left think he is, and that voting for anyone just to get him out of office is the answer. I voted for the President the first time around and currently plan to do so again, but I admit I am not pleased with a good portion of his policies and am waiting for Kerry to give me a reason to switch. Posted by: Mathew at June 25, 2004 09:30 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|