|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
April 22, 2004A setup?Kerry said he would release his military records. Then he said that he wouldn’t release all of the records. Firestorm ensues, particularly in conservative blogosphere. Okay, once the media frenzy is in high gear and everyone is watching, Kerry releases records which show that, unlike Bush – who checked the box “DO NOT VOLUNTEER FOR OVERSEAS” -- Kerry wrote “I request duty in Vietnam.” Now lefty blogosphere displays the two forms, side by side, and says "take that." (See here and here.) I don’t know if this was a deliberate strategy, but it is working out nicely. UPDATE: Allegedly "goaded" by LT Smash, Kevin Drum twists the knife. Posted by Todd Pearson at April 22, 2004 02:19 PMComments
Todd: The big question is what is his plan to handle terrorism, particularly given the UNSCAM is seeming to compromise his preferred alies. Heroics I'm not going to vote for a guy because he was a hero 35 years ago, but I think that it provides some insight on the man. I also think it is as least as relevant as his protest of the war afterward, the issue the GOP wants to discuss. I don't need any further information about either his service or his later protests. Posted by: Todd Pearson at April 22, 2004 03:07 PMThe "JFK routine"? Who'd have thought that people would be so cavalier about an individual saving people's lives while under fire? I can't decide which is uglier...the Republican attack machine on Kerry saying he didn't deserve his medals...or the cavalier attitude about saving lives. This is shameful, in my opinion. Posted by: at April 22, 2004 04:42 PMThe records indicate the type of men they are. This country changed after Vietnam. That was a huge line of demarcation. The way I see it, after that it became an us and them country. It led to an overgrowth of spoiled and soft yuppies. And, now their offspring. So, now what do we want? I don't think that we all should be required to put our blood on the line for military misadventures to be Uncle Sam to the world? We are in 135+ countries. The Republicans don't want to pay for and reduced taxes on top of it all. Do we want to pay people who serve mercenary wages, so that if they lose life or limb their families are well taken care of? Why not? You're all paying for the mercenaries over there now. Patriotism? There has never been a national debate about National Service requirement for all? I think we all should be trained to defend our home land.
No. Not a setup. The conservatives overreached. They always assume the worst of liberals, so they assume that a decorated heroic liberal must be a fake. I do think the records are relevant, because they show that Kerry killed Viet Cong in the service of this country. Carter, and arguably Clinton, were Commanders-In-Chief who were afraid to pull the trigger. Kerry is an alpha male who can handle the job. Posted by: rickheller at April 22, 2004 08:53 PMInterestingly enough I'm hearing that Halliburton had contracts with Saddam via offshore companies and strategic alliances while Cheney was CEO. This at a time when US companies were barred from doing business with Saddam. Posted by: Kevin at April 23, 2004 12:09 PMEveryone claims that Vietnam was a pointless war that was not worth dying for. As a 34 year old whose seen us fight in Grenada and Panama, what wars WERE worth fighting for? Posted by: Rachel at April 26, 2004 08:21 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|