A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

April 21, 2004

Bush's Demeanor

I caught excerpts of a public appearance by Bush a few nights ago. It was immediately apparent that the stress is taking a toll on him, as he looked tired and nervous. Not that this isn't understandable, it sure is.

But one thing struck me, a characteristic of Bush's public demeanor that has disturbed me at times in the past , and that he was sufffering from during this appearance. What it is is this: on occasion when Bush is making serious remarks about an important issue he seems unable to stop himself from smiling and even chuckling. I find it VERY unbecoming of a President, but I don't know what to make of it. Any thoughts from anyone out there that are not gratuitously disparaging?

Posted by Brian Keegan at April 21, 2004 12:07 PM
Comments

I completely agree with Brian's comment. At best this could be a nervous tick; at worst it could be construed as whining. Maybe President Bush's demeanor would be better if he had more chances to exercise it. I would be interested to know if there have been any Presidents since the advent of television who have had fewer Press Conferences than President Bush. I believe appearance is very important in politics. And right now President Bush's does not appear to be very resolute in his stances.

Posted by: Rob Gullo at April 21, 2004 12:39 PM

His public emotion generally appear backwards. He appears to tear up when making threats, and smiles about sad things.

Posted by: asdf at April 21, 2004 03:07 PM

You mean, we can't say it's because he's a jerk with an underdeveloped capacity for empathy?

Posted by: Hugo at April 22, 2004 01:52 AM

Difficult as it is for me to avoid being gratuitously disparaging when talking about Bush, I shall attempt to do so. (Yes, I recognize that the previous statement was both gratuitous and disparaging, but c'mon, at least let me have that much)

I believe Bush has a problem dealing honestly with difficult news. He comes across as earnest and believable when he's talking about pride in America, or even when he's speaking in general terms about "taking responsibility." But when it comes to discussing with the public specifics and detailing events which are not going well or which require sacrifice, he speaks around the issue, stammers, and nervously smiles and laughs. You can spin Bush's frat boy charm in a positive or negative light depending on your personal stance, but you have to admit that it's geared toward playfulness and attempts to minimize or even deny any bad news. When forced to deal with issues that need to be taken seriously, he is simply out of his element.

Posted by: Jeremy at April 22, 2004 09:59 AM

My take on this is:
When GWB is being resolute he can come across as speaking from the heart and he can look the part. He does a good job of projecting that "hear me now, I really mean this" tone. He gets his "game face" on --- that's his style on offense.

When he is being defensive, trying to explain himself, trying to justify something, then comes the "smiley" look, the little smirk or playful facial gesture. He feels some tension in the air, some adversarial climate, and while he tries to counter it with words (not his strength) he also employs what seems to be almost a playful look --- one that tries to break the ice and seem like a "regular guy". The underlying intent, I suppose, is to ingratiate himself; because some are so repulsed by him, though, they see it as insensivity and/or shallowness, and/or cluelessness.

Posted by: Terry Ott at April 22, 2004 10:13 PM

In some ways, Bush's frequently inappropriate demeanor reminds me of Sen. Dave Durenberger (R-MN). I once was in the audience for a speech by Durenberger in which he described how the death of a good friend's young son had a powerful effect on Durenberger's approach to politics. Yet Durenberger never stopped smiling. It was one of those obviously fake smiles that many nervous people and some politicians adopt when speaking in public, so it was clear that Durenberger was not secretly enjoying reminiscing about the death of his friend's son. Yet his expression was in such contrast to the content and tone of his words that it rendered the speech almost surreal.

So perhaps Bush is just a bit uncomfortable in the hot seat. On the other hand, this is a man who childishly mocked a Christian woman's pleas for mercy as he ordered her execution. While standing on a stage in 2000, Bush pointed into the audience and, on an open mike, and called a man "a major league asshole." He taunted America's enemies to "bring it on," which is to say, he invited terrorists and Iraqi insurgents to attack American soldiers. So maybe the inappropriate laughter and smirks are a sign that Bush is just a simple jerk you wouldn't want over to your house for burgers and a beer, not that he sufferes from mild stagefright like Sen. Durenberger. Given the stories I've heard about Bush's table manners from friends who have dined with him, and given how poor his character seems in other regards, I lean toward the annoying jerk interpretation, but the Durenberger-style anxiety is at least a plausible explanation for Bush's behavior.

Posted by: Scott Rogers at May 11, 2004 09:50 PM

I am a life-long Republican and local elected official who finds this administration terminally toxic to the Republic for which it stands. The Bush smirk is a congemptuous means of givng the back of his hand to those who don't buy his lies.
jk ridgefield ct

Posted by: John Katz at August 21, 2004 05:40 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661