|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
February 26, 2004Greenspan Scatters the RoachesYesterday Alan Greenspan suggested that the growing imbalance between incomes and outlays in the social security program was a looming catastrophe best dealt with sooner rather than later. Greenspan sensibly suggested that things like cuts in benefit amounts and reductions in the inflation growth rate should be on the table. These comments had roughly the same affect as turning a light on in a room full of cockroaches, as Kerry, Edwards and Bush all took immediate efforts to distance themselves from the harsh light Greenspan shone on a problem that most sensible Americans know is a disaster waiting to happen. All three preferred to recede into the shadows where it is easy to pretend that more benefits can be paid to more retirees while collecting less money, that the system can be fixed with no pain incurred by anyone. Posted by Brian Keegan at February 26, 2004 12:25 PMComments
Just one more reason why America needs a fiscal conservative in the White House. Clearly we're not going to get one this time around. Posted by: Kevin at February 26, 2004 01:13 PMEven those harshly critical of Greenspan's comments have to know he is right. They simple see no political gain in admitting it. Someone of stature has to publicly state what we all know and do not want to admit, that no matter what, the USA cannot possibly provide the promised benefits to baby boomers. To some extent we are fortunate that Old Europe will suffer this problem before we do and maybe we will be able to learn from their misery in time. Posted by: tallan at February 28, 2004 12:03 AMAn author of an excellent essay in a book that I edited noted that the Social Security dilemma could be addressed, in part, by providing clever incentives to encourage elderly employees to stay in the workforce longer. In general, making maximal use of the special skills set and experience that older workers will tend to possess. I think that the Social Security challenge is soluble if we make baby steps; help encourage older workers to remain employed (as Japan has done so well), maybe raise the retirement age by a year (far in the future, so it doesn't hit anyone too close to retirement). The more gradually we slow down the speeding car, the less of a shock it'll be in contrast to the slamming on the brakes when the fiscal crisis hits. Yet politicians balk at making even these tiny moves. The problem is pretty obvious: Otto von Bismarck designed Social Security and the retirement age (65) in early-industrial Germany as a way of paying out pensions and supporting the small number of elderly families who'd be stuck in a bind with the shift away from agriculture. Actuarial charts were radically different in the 1880s and this was feasible. But principles and policies always have to be revised and adjusted as empirical circumstances change and alter previous assumptions. Sometimes I fret that our political system, as currently designed and implemented, just isn't capable of this. IMHO the Social Security and entitlements crisis, far more than some foreign war or terrorist chemical weapons attack, has the potential to ruin the United States as a great power the way the World Wars ruined the European nations as great powers. If that happens 50 years from now, we'll look back ruefully on the words of Greenspan and similar sages and wonder why our predecessors were so blockheaded as to stick their heads in the sand when a storm was so obviously about to strike. Posted by: Wes Ulm at March 23, 2004 12:17 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|