|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
January 30, 2004Charisma and WeaselingSince Rick called me out on my comment that Clark lack charisma, I've thought about it some more, and I realize that I've left out something of a connection. In short, my sense is that the harder a politician is weaseling, the more he tends to lack charisma. And I'm not trying to pick on Clark in particular. It seems to me to be true in general for all but the most practised weasels. In Clark's case, it seems to me that Clark has been called upon to do more weaseling than usual, because he may not have spent much time thinking about domestic policy until he became a candidate, and so a large part of his policy has been crafted more with an eye to garnering votes in the democratic primary than with a genuine connection to anything he passionately believes. And on foreign policy, he's been trying to have it both ways, so every time he has to think very carefully about each word that comes out of his mouth, there's less brain left over for passionately and clearly connecting on the basis of what he really believes. And again, let me stress that I'm not posting to pick on Clark. Notice how much less charisma Dean has these days. He's defensive, trying too hard to control his demeanor, and using so much brain on being careful that he's not connecting. How much charisma does Dean project when he has to talk about religion? Not much, because he's made the judgement that to be 100% frank is deadly to his candidacy. And I'm not picking on Dean either. The fact is that when you speak from the heart about what you truly believe, you generally project some charisma, you make genuine person-to-person connections, unless of course what you say is very alien to your audience, if they believe something very different. And every time you take a step that tempers what you really believe in an effort not to upset some part of your audience, it becomes harder to project genuineness, passion, real leadership. And now I'm recalling Mike Dukakis. He spent most of his general election campaign parsing words and tempering message, and he only made a too-late closing effort when he scrapped the script and started speaking more from his heart. So I guess that when I say that it feels to me that Clark, or Dean, or Kerry, or whoever lacks charisma, what I'm really saying is that the person seems to me to not really be speaking very much from his heart. And at some point you have to choose to do this (or at least project this) to win the Presidency. Posted by Brian Keegan at January 30, 2004 01:06 PMComments
Acting is all about honesty. If you can fake that, you've got it made -- George Burns Posted by: rickheller at January 30, 2004 04:14 PMBrian, I do believe I totally understand what you are talking about. And that is probably what attracts me to Lieberman and Edwards. I also wonder if that isn't what makes Bush attractive to the Republicans and even some of the more conservative Democrats. Even if you don't necessarily agree with what he says, you have to agree he believes it -- and he is speaking "from the heart." Posted by: Heather Feuerhelm at January 31, 2004 02:33 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|