|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
December 22, 2003Blogging The Numbers: Week 5I've produced a chart examining candidate matchups by home region in the 14 presidential elections of the post-war era. It also reminds me of candy cane.
![]() The first column shows that in races where both candidates came from outside the South (N indicates Non-southern), Republicans won 5 of 6 elections. The once exception, labelled '60, was John Kennedy's win over Richard Nixon. When a southern candidate faced one from outside the South, the Southerner prevailed in all cases except for Reagan's triumph over Carter in '80. 4 of 6 Democratic victories came when southern Democrats ran against non-southern Republicans (counting Truman vs. Dewey in '48). As far as why southern Democrats have an advantage, I don't think it's simply because they are more centrist than non-southern Democrats. Except for Goldwater, the Republicans they defeated were relatively moderate themselves. There may simply be some sectional advantage to candidates who make southern voters comfortable without offending voters in other parts of the country. On the other hand, the many losing non-southern Democrats have been quite liberal, and probably further from the center than the Republicans who defeated them. The single northern Democrat who won in the post-war period was John Kennedy. His narrow victory came after a campaign in which he took positions at least as muscular as the Republican on foreign policy issues. A victory by a northern anti-war Democrat in 2004 would be an astonishing reversal of the historic pattern. A table counting blog posts mentioning the current Democratic candidates in the last week can be found at Blogging Of The President:2004 Posted by rickheller at December 22, 2003 10:16 PMComments
Add an asterisk by the 1988 win, as Bush the Elder only had what? ... 5, 6, or 7 "home" states? Sure, technically a Texan and even represented Houston in Congress. But by every measure of the man, he was more Maine than Midland. Posted by: Greg Wythe at December 24, 2003 09:40 AMI felt it would seem arbitrary to count George W. Bush as a Texan but not his father, even though there is a cultural difference between the two Bush generations If I were to move the '88 victory to the N vs. N category, it would further emphasize Republican dominance when the Democrat is not a southerner. Posted by: rickheller at December 24, 2003 07:12 PMGreg Whythe is correct. Bush 41 is definitely NOT a Southerner!! He's probably the most liberal Republican in history to live in the White House but definitely NOT a Southerner. Posted by: Paul Fields at January 2, 2004 03:18 AM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|