A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

December 22, 2003

Blogging The Numbers: Week 5

I've produced a chart examining candidate matchups by home region in the 14 presidential elections of the post-war era. It also reminds me of candy cane.


Dec20 bar chart

The first column shows that in races where both candidates came from outside the South (N indicates Non-southern), Republicans won 5 of 6 elections. The once exception, labelled '60, was John Kennedy's win over Richard Nixon. When a southern candidate faced one from outside the South, the Southerner prevailed in all cases except for Reagan's triumph over Carter in '80. 4 of 6 Democratic victories came when southern Democrats ran against non-southern Republicans (counting Truman vs. Dewey in '48).

As far as why southern Democrats have an advantage, I don't think it's simply because they are more centrist than non-southern Democrats. Except for Goldwater, the Republicans they defeated were relatively moderate themselves. There may simply be some sectional advantage to candidates who make southern voters comfortable without offending voters in other parts of the country.

On the other hand, the many losing non-southern Democrats have been quite liberal, and probably further from the center than the Republicans who defeated them. The single northern Democrat who won in the post-war period was John Kennedy. His narrow victory came after a campaign in which he took positions at least as muscular as the Republican on foreign policy issues. A victory by a northern anti-war Democrat in 2004 would be an astonishing reversal of the historic pattern.

A table counting blog posts mentioning the current Democratic candidates in the last week can be found at Blogging Of The President:2004

Posted by rickheller at December 22, 2003 10:16 PM
Comments

Add an asterisk by the 1988 win, as Bush the Elder only had what? ... 5, 6, or 7 "home" states? Sure, technically a Texan and even represented Houston in Congress. But by every measure of the man, he was more Maine than Midland.

Posted by: Greg Wythe at December 24, 2003 09:40 AM

I felt it would seem arbitrary to count George W. Bush as a Texan but not his father, even though there is a cultural difference between the two Bush generations

If I were to move the '88 victory to the N vs. N category, it would further emphasize Republican dominance when the Democrat is not a southerner.

Posted by: rickheller at December 24, 2003 07:12 PM

Greg Whythe is correct.

Bush 41 is definitely NOT a Southerner!!

He's probably the most liberal Republican in history to live in the White House but definitely NOT a Southerner.

Posted by: Paul Fields at January 2, 2004 03:18 AM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661