A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics


Centerfield is the blog of the Centrist Coalition.

We're open to new contributors. If you would like to blog with us, email
cf at centristcoalition dot com

Get all the new posts from a wide variety of centrist blogs with a single click of the Centrist Blogosphere

Google Centrist News

Get a balanced diet of liberal, and conservative blogs at the
Centerfield Blog Aggregator

Links

Independent Nation

Center Links:

<< ? The VCWC # >>

Radical Middle

Resources:

 

November 17, 2003

What Makes a Hypocrite?

Well, Rush Limbaugh returned to the airwaves with what initially struck me as a slithery defense against critics’ claims of hypocrisy. I checked RushLimbaugh.com for the transcript and it was there, but the quote I heard on the radio( from another talk show host that was miffed about Limbaugh's parsing) didn't show up.

So I'll paraphrase. He says that despite what his critics claim, that he’s not a hypocrite because he was right that taking drugs is bad and destructive behavior. So he wasn't wrong. He was right all along, and hence not a hypocrite.

Now I was all ready to pile on until I read the def'n of hypocrisy, which says that hypocrisy is the feigning of beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess. So what's the deal? Leaving aside Limbaugh, let's consider it in the abstract. If you truly believe that say, drugs, or whatever is wrong, but can't resist them, are you a hypocrite, or just weak?Inarguably, someone who says over and over that drugs are evil and destructive, but doesn't really believe that, and uses them liberally, well sure, that person is a hypocrite. But if you truly believe in and aspire to a moral standard, but can't meet that standard, are you also hypocrite, or are you just a bad role model?

And yeah, you can PARSE the def'n and focus on the pretense of a virtue you don't possess, but I'm not interested in hanging Rush Limbaugh high. What I find interesting is that it seems to me that the public espousal of a moral standard one don't really believe in is a higher crime tha the public espousal of a standard one truly DOES believe in even though one can't meet that standard.

So if one classifies both cases as hypocrisy, then what seems to me to be an important distinction is lost. The funny part in all this is that Limbaugh's defense is, well, Clintonesque.

Posted by Brian Keegan at November 17, 2003 09:18 PM
Comments

Well, even given the reduced choice that an addict has, saying one thing and doing another amounts to hypocrisy. OK, so he couldn't stop taking the pills on his own, yet he did not seek help until he was busted. Recovery is all about getting honest with yourself and taking responsibility for your past behaviors. If Rush can't come out and say "I was a hypocrite for excoriating drug addicts while I was addicted myself" I have to question his sincerity and how honest he is being with himself. I do wish him the best in recovery though.

Posted by: Ron C at November 18, 2003 11:20 AM

I caught the first part of his show yesterday. My initial impression was simply, "Wow. Twelve-step Rush!"

Posted by: Tully at November 18, 2003 12:34 PM
(Comments on this entry may be closed after 7 days to prevent spam)




Do you choose the politicians, or do they choose you? Find out how to put the people back in charge.

Archives


Recent Entries

March 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  


Powered by
Movable Type 2.661